Chinese
如果将瓶子置于不为空瓶的状态，那么用什么理性能阻止瓶子之外的真实成立的顽固存在呢？即使阻止也不需要，因为对于凡夫俗子来说，也没有谁会执着于瓶子之外的真实成立。那么，你说要阻止谁呢？ 再者，世俗中存在的法，如瓶子等，是胜义谛观察所考察的对象或基础。像兔角等根本不存在的事物，不会成为考察的对象。但按照你的说法，世俗中存在的一切都不会成为胜义谛观察的对象，而世俗中不存在的事物却说是胜义谛考察的基础。如果世俗中存在的一切不是胜义谛观察的考察对象和考察行为，那么在不考察、不阻止的情况下，如何否定真实成立呢？如果将世俗中存在的事物作为一异有无的考察对象，而不进行考察，又如何能阻止真实成立的顽固存在呢？如果世俗中瓶子不空于瓶子，那么瓶子也不空于真实成立。因为世俗中瓶子本身被认为是真实成立的瓶子。如果不是这样，世俗中瓶子等法在自己的体性上不被认为是真实的，那么世俗谛就会丧失，世俗谛也无法通过世俗谛的量来成立。因此，瓶子本身并非真实空性，请承认氆氇等其他法是真实空性吧！如果世俗谛不真实，就没有二谛，没有二谛无别，就没有真如。以他法空性的空性，无遮遣就变成了真如。这样的空性在外道中也有，如经中所说：“一切有为法，皆是空性也，少分之空性，外道亦有之。” 再者，如果因为胜义中不存在就不能理解为不存在，那么胜义就不真实，世俗就变成真实的，二谛双运就不可能了。如果因为世俗中存在就不能理解为存在，那么世俗不真实也和这相同。如果以双运一切种胜妙的空性，证悟了轮回涅槃平等性，那么以证悟此境的见解就能阻止寂灭边。如此，如嘉察大师等诸佛子所说的那样确定无疑。但你的空性却被认为是三乘共同的道，如果没有悲心，那它怎能寂灭呢？
English
If you leave the pot in a state of not being empty of a pot, then with what reasoning can you prevent the stubborn existence of true establishment other than the pot? Even if you prevent it, it is not necessary, because even for ordinary beings, there is no one who clings to true establishment other than the pot. So, tell me, whom are you trying to prevent? Furthermore, phenomena that exist conventionally, such as pots, are the objects or basis for investigation by ultimate analysis. Things that are completely nonexistent, like horns of a rabbit, are not made objects of that analysis. But according to you, everything that exists conventionally does not become an object of investigation by ultimate analysis, and things that do not exist conventionally are said to be the basis for ultimate analysis. If everything that exists conventionally is not the object and act of investigation by ultimate analysis, then how can true establishment be refuted without investigating or preventing it? If you make things that exist conventionally the object of investigation of one or many, without investigating, how can you prevent the stubborn existence of true establishment from being seized? If a pot is not empty of a pot conventionally, then a pot is also not empty of true establishment. Because conventionally, the pot itself is considered to be a truly established pot. If it is not established, if phenomena such as pots are not considered to be true in their own nature conventionally, then conventional truth is lost, and conventional truth will not be established by conventional valid cognition. Therefore, the pot itself is not empty of truth. Please acknowledge that other phenomena such as woolen cloth are empty of truth! If conventional truth is not true, then there are no two truths, and without the inseparability of the two truths, there is no suchness. The emptiness of emptiness by other phenomena, the non-affirming negation, becomes suchness. Such emptiness also exists in the systems of the tirthikas, as it is said in the sutras: "All existence is completely empty. The partial emptiness is held by the tirthikas." Furthermore, if not existing ultimately does not mean not understanding, then the ultimate is not true, and the conventional becomes true, and the union of the two truths is impossible. If not understanding existence because of existing conventionally, then the conventional not being true is the same. If, with the emptiness that possesses all supreme aspects of union, one realizes the equality of samsara and nirvana, then with the view that has the object of realizing that, one can prevent the extreme of peace. Thus, it is certain as stated by the Victorious Ones with their Sons, such as Gyaltsab Je. But your emptiness is considered to be a path common to the three vehicles, so without compassion, how can it pacify?