Chinese
如果确定是这样，那么水和牛奶虽然种类不同，但却能产生同样的腐烂结果。牛奶能使米饭等腐烂，水也能做到。既然如此，从多种性质不同的因中，怎么会产生同一种果呢？按理说不应该，但实际上却存在这种情况。如果有人这样问，那么接下来是第二点：回答以及它的成立之理。第一点：水和牛奶在产生腐烂方面并非种类不同，因为两者都具有液体的能力，因此在种类上是相同的，所以能使米饭等腐烂。因此，两者在液体方面是同一种类，而不是像火和无火的石堆那样。对方说：如果这样，那么水和牛奶这些物质既然是不同的，那么是认为它们具有同一性吗？如果认为是同一性，那么一切都会变成一体。如果认为是不同的，那么就只会是不同的因，怎么会是液体这一同一性呢？因为没有一种脱离水和牛奶的液体能够单独产生果实。这是对的，因为如果从自相的层面来考虑，不仅是水和牛奶，就连作为各自果实的因的水，彼此之间也安住于各自的体性，因此就像已经很好地论证了它们是互不相随的差异一样。那么，什么是种类相同呢？仅仅是潮湿的法，与非液体相区别，被称为液体，并且对于将液体视为同一自性的心识来说，水和牛奶这两者没有差别，因此被称为液体在种类上相同。这不仅限于此，所有种类相同的物体都是这样命名的，否则，对于自相不混淆的事物，就无法以总体的形式命名说“这是这个的因，这是这个的果”。第二，成立之理：自己所认可的成立之方式。驳斥他人观点的意义。第一点：水和牛奶虽然物质不同，但在液体方面种类相同，同样，火的各种差别虽然不同，但凭借与非火不同的部分，对于任何事物，都能成为认识到“这些都是火，种类相同”的依据，即具有热和燃烧性质的任何事物。
English
If it is certain, then although water and milk are different in kind, they produce the same result of decay. Milk can cause rice and other things to rot, and water can do the same. Since this is the case, how can the same kind of fruit arise from many different kinds of causes? It shouldn't, but in reality, it does. If someone asks this, then next is the second point: the answer and its reason for establishment. First point: water and milk are not different in kind in producing decay, because both have the ability of liquid, so they are the same in kind, so they can cause rice and other things to rot. Therefore, both are the same kind of liquid, not like fire and a pile of stones without fire. The other party says: If this is the case, then since water and milk are different substances, do you think they have the same nature? If you think they are the same, then everything will become one. If you think they are different, then they will only be different causes, how can they be the same in liquid? Because there is no liquid that is separate from water and milk that can produce fruit alone. This is true, because if you consider it from the level of self-characteristics, not only water and milk, but even the water that is the cause of each fruit, they also abide in their own nature, so it is like it has been well argued that they are different from each other. So, what is the same kind? Only the wet dharma, which is distinguished from non-liquid, is called liquid, and for the mind that regards liquid as the same self-nature, there is no difference between water and milk, so it is called liquid is the same in kind. This is not limited to this, all objects of the same kind are named in this way, otherwise, for things whose self-characteristics are not confused, it is impossible to name in a general way saying "this is the cause of this, this is the fruit of this." Second, the reason for establishment: the way in which one's own accepted view is established. The meaning of refuting other people's views. First point: Although water and milk are different substances, they are the same in kind in liquid, similarly, although the various differences of fire are different, but by virtue of the part that is different from non-fire, for any thing, it can become the basis for recognizing "these are all fire, the same in kind", that is, any thing that has the nature of heat and burning.