English
Because it has already been explained, it is not explained separately, this is a concluding word. Furthermore, if someone says that narration has elements such as abducting daughters, but stories are not like that, then, regarding this, there is: Abducting daughters and wars, deception and prosperity, etc., (works) bound by chapters are the same, those are not the merits of distinguishing (narration and story). This is because abducting daughters and wars, deception and leading to prosperity, etc., are all considered the same in all poems bound by chapters. Those are not the merits of distinguishing between narration and story. Also, if someone says that a trace of what a poet's mind has done slightly exists is not narration, but another story, then, regarding this, there is: The trace of what a poet's mind has done, in other aspects is also not a fault, on the path of accomplishing intentions, what cannot be changed for the wise? This means that the trace of what a poet's mind has done, like that, in stories other than narration and in aspects such as (works) bound by chapters, it is also not a fault, because on the path of methods for accomplishing intentions, there is nothing that the wise cannot change. Third, explaining mixtures, divided into two types: main and secondary. The first is: Mixture is drama, etc., those are extensively explained elsewhere. This means that treatises on drama, etc., which have the nature of mixed poetry and prose and possess all four language types, those characteristics and classifications are extensively explained elsewhere such as in Bharata, etc. The second is: Whatever is the nature of mixed prose and poetry, is clearly expressed in Jambudvipa. This means that even if all four language types are not complete, whatever is the nature of mixed prose and poetry is clearly expressed in Jambudvipa. Second, explaining the four divisions by language type, divided into three: classification, separate explanation, and the forms of the treatises composed by those. The first is: The nature of language, those are also, Sanskrit, similarly nature and, corrupted mixed, called, four types are spoken by the wise. This means that the nature of language, those three bodies are also, Sanskrit, i.e., Saṁkṛta (梵文天城体：सकृित，梵文罗马拟音：saṁkṛta，汉语字面意思：Sanskrit), similarly nature, i.e., Prakrita (梵文天城体：प्रकृित，梵文罗马拟音：prakṛta，汉语字面意思：natural), corrupted, i.e., Apabhramsa (梵文天城体：अवभ्रंश，梵文罗马拟音：avabhraṁśa，汉语字面意思：corrupted), and the mixed language mixed with those three, called four types, are spoken by wise people such as Rama Sharma, etc.