Chinese
为了对治两种邪分别念，分别宣说了两种理证，即：为了对治一切事物不坏灭的邪分别念，宣说了有妨害的理证；为了对治虽然总体上坏灭，但依赖于从自身因产生的坏灭因他事而坏灭的邪分别念，宣说了无依赖的理证。第二，确定彼生关系的能立有二：所立的因果确定，以及如何确定的方式。第一，分二：定义和分类。第一，因果的定义依次是：以对自己的他事后有施加利益的力量，成为随之行止之处；以对自己的他事前有施加利益的力量，成为随之行止之处。第二，分二：因的分类和果的分类。第一，对于因，分别说者说： “作者、俱生与， 等起具足和， 遍行与异熟， 因有六种想。” 虽然认为因有六种，但在此，作者因、俱生因和等起因三种不是因的自性，因为作者因不是施加利益者，后两种与果同时。其他三种在此也必须承认为因，因为宣说了等起因和异熟因两种，并且遍行因被包括在等起因之中。因此，如果分类因，则有等起因和异熟因两种，或者有近取因和俱作因两种。第二，对于果，分别说者认为有异熟果、等流果、离系果、士用果和增上果五种果，但在此，前两种果按照分别说者的观点来承认，第三种不是果，因为不是实有。第五种和第四种虽然承认，但不按照分别说者的观点来承认，因为没有因果同时的情况，并且一切有为法不是互相的因果。那么，那两者的体性是什么呢？
English
In order to counteract the two kinds of wrong conceptions, two kinds of reasons are separately explained, namely: to counteract the wrong conception that all things do not perish, the reason with hindrance is explained; to counteract the wrong conception that although generally perishing, it perishes depending on other things that cause the perishing that arises later from its own cause, the reason without dependence is explained. Secondly, there are two ways to establish the relationship of that arising: the determination of the cause and effect to be established, and the manner in which it is determined. First, there are two parts: definition and classification. First, the definitions of cause and effect are, respectively: by the power of benefiting its other subsequent thing, it becomes the place of following and ceasing; by the power of benefiting its other prior thing, it becomes the place of following and ceasing. Second, there are two parts: the classification of causes and the classification of effects. First, regarding causes, the Vaibhashikas say: "The agent, co-emergent, and, Equal, possessing, Pervading and maturation, Causes are thought to be six kinds." Although it is thought that there are six kinds of causes, here, the agent cause, the co-emergent cause, and the equal cause are not the nature of cause, because the agent cause is not a benefactor, and the latter two are simultaneous with the effect. The other three must also be acknowledged as causes here, because the equal cause and the maturation cause are explained, and the pervasive cause is included in the equal cause. Therefore, if causes are classified, there are two kinds: the equal cause and the maturation cause, or the substantial cause and the co-operative cause. Second, regarding effects, the Vaibhashikas think that there are five kinds of effects: the maturation effect, the similar cause effect, the separation effect, the agent effect, and the dominant effect, but here, the first two effects are acknowledged according to the Vaibhashika's view, and the third is not an effect, because it is not existent. The fifth and fourth are acknowledged, but not according to the Vaibhashika's view, because there is no simultaneous cause and effect, and all conditioned phenomena are not mutual causes and effects. Then, what are the entities of those two?