Chinese
是的，那位论师以六道众生中的任何一道为基础，否定了这些众生的世俗谛的能境和所境在名言中也是真实的。因此，那样的真实如同真实的显现，如同梦境的所知一样，是错觉中的错觉，是欺骗中的虚假，因为那是当时的究竟密意。因此，你的语词之因也不成立。如果那个基上没有其他五道众生，那还可以成立，如果还有，那么其他五道的境和有境的真实世俗谛，是谁也不能强行否定的。如果不成立，那么，人道的基和显现给人的境和有境的真实世俗谛，也应该被强行否定为不存在。因为说不成立是相同的。还有，六道众生中，除了人世间和第四禅的净居天以外的世界的境和有境，所有其他众生的被认为是真实世俗谛的那些，都应该是颠倒的世俗谛。还有，区分颠倒的世俗谛是真是假，是根据哪一道众生的所依来安立圆满正等觉成佛，以及在那一道众生的刹土中是否转法轮，是否结集教典等等？因为在这三界众生的类别中，成佛的刹土和所依，除了色界的色究竟天和人世间以外是不可能有的。周遍是你自己宗派的特点。因是如《楞伽经》等中圆满正等觉所说。如果承认，那么在讲解中观的时候，以众生的所依和处所来区分颠倒的世俗谛的真假，是以前汉藏的任何圣人都没有说过的，但你们萨迦派显得是承担萨迦派教法最重负担的发心者，因此从今以后萨迦派的人在讲解中观的时候，应该承认萨迦派宗派中世俗谛和颠倒的差别，这种不共的安立方式。还有，你们说转法轮，结集教典，以及造论著，全部都是在人道的所依上做的，做了非常大的决断啊。
English
Yes, that teacher, based on any of the six realms of beings, denies that both the object and subject of conventional truth for those beings are true even in name. Therefore, such truth, like the appearance of truth, like the knowable of a dream, is a delusion within a delusion, a falsehood within deception, because that is the ultimate intention at that time. Therefore, your verbal reason is also not established. If there are no other five realms of beings on that basis, then it can be established, but if there are, then the true conventional truth of the objects and subjects of the other five realms cannot be forcibly denied by anyone. If it is not established, then the true conventional truth of the basis of human beings and the objects and subjects that appear to humans should also be forcibly denied as non-existent. Because saying it is not established is the same. Furthermore, among the six realms of beings, the so-called true conventional truths of all other beings except for the human world and the objects and subjects of the world of the Pure Abode of the Fourth Dhyana should all be inverted conventional truths. Furthermore, what is it that distinguishes whether an inverted conventional truth is true or false, and on what basis of beings is it established that a fully enlightened Buddha becomes enlightened, and whether or not the wheel of Dharma is turned in that realm of beings, and whether or not the teachings are compiled, etc.? Because in this category of beings in the three realms, the realm and basis for enlightenment cannot exist other than in the Akanishta of the Form Realm and the human world. The pervasiveness is established as a characteristic of your own school. The reason is that the fully enlightened Buddha spoke in the Lankavatara Sutra and others. If you admit it, then when explaining Madhyamaka, distinguishing the truth and falsehood of inverted conventional truth by the basis and place of beings is something that no holy person of India or Tibet has ever said before, but you Sakyapas seem to be those who bear the heaviest burden of the Sakya teachings, so from now on, when Sakyapas explain Madhyamaka, they should acknowledge this unique way of establishing the difference between conventional truth and inverted truth in the Sakya school. Also, you have made a very strong determination that turning the wheel of Dharma, compiling the teachings, and composing commentaries are all done on the basis of human beings.