Chinese
因为睡眠和盲人都一样没有眼根。第二，如果分析，梦中不可能有能力；如果不分析，那也有眼睛两种情况。第一种情况，能力的自性和原因都不合理。第一点是：如果像你一样，梦中的第六识的能力已经成熟，醒来时却没有，那么第六识的能力成熟怎么会在这里没有呢？那样的话，为什么不能说梦中没有呢？难道蓝色显现的那种意识的原因，即使没有外境的对境，也是存在的，因为能力成熟会产生那样的意识。如果认为那只是因为睡眠的缘故，只在梦中有，而醒来时则没有，那是不合理的。如果按照你的观点，梦中有那种第六识的能力成熟，而醒来时却没有，不会有如上所说的过失。按照我们的观点，应该这样说：梦中也没有那种具有显现的意识，为什么不能这样说呢？因为有道理。第六识的能力成熟就像醒来时盲人没有一样。第二点是：就像没有眼睛不是这个的原因一样，梦中睡眠也不是原因。就像醒来时没有眼睛的盲人相续中，显现蓝色等的意识的能力成熟的原因不是眼睛一样，梦中睡眠也不是意识的能力成熟的原因，因为两者都一样没有眼睛。第二点是：因此，梦中也应该承认那个虚假的眼睛和具有虚假对境的认知是认识的原因。正如前面所说的那样，因此，梦中也应该承认那种具有对境的意识的真实（217a） 事物是虚假的眼睛，以及作为那个意识所依赖的虚假对境的根是认识对境的原因，因为没有眼睛等根，就看不到认识对境的色声等。第二，没有理性和经教的论证。第一点是：用这个回答了什么，以及回答了什么，那个和那个都被看作是相同的承诺，这个辩论就解决了。中观宗认为，醒来时的对境、根和意识这三者都是自性空，因为是所缘的缘故，就像梦一样。
English
Because both sleep and blindness are similar in that they lack the eye faculty. Secondly, if analyzed, it is not reasonable to have the capacity in dreams; if not analyzed, there are two cases where there are also eyes. In the first case, both the nature of the capacity and the cause are unreasonable. The first point is: If, according to you, the capacity of the sixth consciousness in dreams has matured, but it is not present when awake, then how can the maturation of the sixth consciousness be absent here? In that case, why can't it be said that there is no dream? Is it that the cause of the mind consciousness of such a blue appearance exists even without the object of the external object, because the maturation of the capacity produces such a mind consciousness? If it is thought that it is only present in dreams due to sleep, but not when awake, then it is unreasonable. If, according to your view, there is the maturation of the capacity of such a sixth consciousness in dreams, but it is not present when awake, then there will be no fault as mentioned above. According to our view, it should be said like this: There is also no consciousness with such an appearance in dreams, why can't it be said like that? Because it is reasonable. The maturation of the capacity of the sixth consciousness is similar to the absence in a blind person when awake. The second point is: Just as the absence of eyes is not the cause of this, sleep is also not the cause in dreams. Just as the cause of the maturation of the capacity of the mind consciousness that perceives blue etc. in the continuum of this blind person who has no eyes when awake is not the eyes, sleep is also not the cause of the maturation of the capacity of the mind consciousness in dreams, because both are similar in that they lack eyes. The second point is: Therefore, in dreams, one should also acknowledge that the false eye and the cognition with a false object are the cause of recognition. As mentioned earlier, therefore, in dreams, one should also acknowledge that the real (217a) thing of the consciousness with an object is the false eye, and the root of the false object on which that consciousness relies is the cause of recognizing the object, because without eyes etc. as roots, one cannot see the recognition of objects such as form and sound. Secondly, there are no proofs of reason and scripture. The first point is: Whatever answer is given with this, and whatever is answered, that and that are seen as the same commitment, this debate is resolved. The Madhyamaka school believes that the object, faculty, and consciousness of the waking state are all empty of inherent existence, because they are objects of focus, just like a dream.