Chinese
被加持后，显示了对新获得的第十物的加持。如果它与第十物的界限分离，那么由于衣服的破损，超过十天和分离一天都是需要舍弃的。分离有两种情况。在附带的三种情况中，与坐垫相关的戒律来自《小部经》。 坐垫是具有加持的。未到达的时间是由于障碍而返回的时间。如果带着以后会来的想法离开，如果不归还，停留在原地是可以的。即使是借用坐垫，也只是铺一下，不需要进行之前的加持，因此没有分离的过失。与大布和缝制物相关的是四部经和三部经。如果大布和缝制物都没有比丘和门闩，则犯轻罪；如果缺少其中任何一个，则犯小罪；缝制物淋雨等则犯轻罪。如果大布在河流上有坚固的桥梁，即使不携带也没有过失，这似乎可以类比于携带缝制物。对于缝制物，即使没有比丘和门闩，也允许寻找未完成的部分，这是否也可以类比于大布呢？在“与比丘一起”的文本中，如果放置处没有守护的比丘和阻挡的门闩，并且携带的路上没有下雨等情况，除了两种特殊情况外，不应该不带缝制物行走。按照这种说法，如果允许布施，并且由于坚硬的支撑，没有比丘等，那么就可以不带缝制物行走，如果必须这样认为，那是不允许的，因为没有比丘和门闩的过失与是否存在这两者无关。因此，必须按照注释书的作者所说的那样进行类比。放置处如果没有比丘等，并且路上没有下雨等情况，无论是否存在两种特殊情况，都不允许不带缝制物行走。这就是“如果没有那样的条件”的意思。那么，如果放置处有比丘和门闩，就可以不带缝制物行走吗？即使有这两者，除了两种特殊情况外，也不允许不带缝制物行走。两种特殊情况是指那时没有缝制物。
English
Having been blessed, it shows the blessing of the newly acquired tenth item. If it is separated from the boundary of the tenth item, then both exceeding ten days and being separated for one day due to the garment's wear and tear are to be abandoned. There are two cases of separation. Among the three incidental cases, the precepts related to the cushion are from the Minor Section of the Sutras. The cushion is blessed. The time of not arriving is the time of turning back due to obstacles. If one leaves with the intention of returning later, it is permissible to stay in the same place if it is not returned. Even when borrowing a cushion, one only needs to spread it out, and there is no need to perform the previous blessing, so there is no fault of separation. Related to the great cloth and the sewn cloth are four sutras and three sutras. If both the great cloth and the sewn cloth are left without a monk and a door latch, it is a transgression; if either one is missing, it is a minor transgression; and if the sewn cloth is rained on, etc., it is a transgression. If there is a sturdy bridge over the river for the great cloth, even if it is not carried, there is no fault, which seems to be analogous to carrying the sewn cloth. For the sewn cloth, even if there is no monk and door latch, it is said to be permissible to seek the incomplete parts, so is it also permissible to apply this to the great cloth? In the text "together with the monk," if the place of placement does not have a guarding monk and a blocking door latch, and there is no rain, etc., on the road of carrying, except for two special cases, one should not walk without the sewn cloth. According to this saying, if it is permissible to give offerings, and because of the firm support, there is no monk, etc., then it is permissible to walk without the sewn cloth, and if it must be thought so, it is not permissible, because the fault of not having a monk and a door latch is not different depending on whether these two exist or not. Therefore, it is necessary to apply it as the author of the commentary has said. If there is no monk, etc., in the place of placement, and there is no rain, etc., on the road, regardless of whether the two special cases exist or not, it is not permissible to walk without carrying the sewn cloth. This is the meaning of "if there are no such conditions." Then, if there is a monk and a door latch in the place of placement, is it permissible to walk without the sewn cloth? Even if there are these two, except for the two special cases, it is not permissible to walk without the sewn cloth. The two special cases refer to the time when there is no sewn cloth.