Chinese
是通過首尾兩種方式來把握的。像這樣，在接受命令之後，以及在祈請之前的進入，是從命令產生的第一粗罪之因。在接受命令之時，以及在那之前的進入沒有粗罪，所以說「接受命令之後」。在開始祈請的階段的進入，即使接受命令也不會捨棄，不能成為粗罪之因，所以說「祈請之前」。這非常合理，因為命令產生的粗罪，必須在接受命令也不捨棄的進入時產生，因為在接受命令之前完全沒有命令，並且在接受命令的過程中，還沒有完成接受命令。同樣地，從祈請和第一個陳述開始，到幾乎完成之間的進入，也不是粗罪之因，各自了解三分之二。第一個、第二個和第三個陳述之前的進入，被分別安立為粗罪。最後的粗罪，是在第三個陳述的三分之二之間的進入時安立的。《注釋》中說的「這個進入」，是指接受命令之時的進入，而不是指完成接受命令之後的進入。進入被稱為結合，是為了排除沒有進行驅逐之業，而是以慾望前往，以及沒有談論記憶，而是進入語言的聽聞也變成結合，所以驅逐等被說成是那個結合的結合，是惡作。請問，那兩者的情況的墮罪是惡作，並且在那個情況下不應接受命令，即使接受命令也不會犯，最後是為了消除對犯戒會變成惡作的疑慮。變成惡作的理由是，《注釋》中說：「因為在這個階段，強烈的執著和罪惡的想法較少。」因此說這是惡作。又，《注釋》中說：「在憶念的階段，即使憶念起不好的事情，也不會完全捨棄，所以知道強烈的執著本身和罪惡的想法也非常強烈，所以在那個時候說是粗罪。」說在對不悅意的事情談論憶念之後，不聽從語言是粗罪。
English
It is grasped through the two ways of beginning and end. Like this, the entry after receiving the command and before the request is the cause of the first gross offense arising from the command. Since there is no gross offense at the time of receiving the command and before that entry, it is said "after receiving the command." The entry at the stage of starting the request, even if the command is received, it will not be abandoned, and it cannot be the cause of a gross offense, so it is said "before the request." This is very reasonable, because the gross offense arising from the command must arise when entering without abandoning even after receiving the command, because there is absolutely no command before receiving the command, and because the command has not been completed while receiving the command. Similarly, the entry from the beginning of the request and the first statement to almost completion is also not the cause of a gross offense, so understand two-thirds of each. The entries before the first, second, and third statements are separately established as gross offenses. The last gross offense is established when entering between two-thirds of the third statement. The "this entry" mentioned in the Commentary refers to the entry at the time of receiving the command, not the entry after completing the receiving of the command. The entry is called union in order to exclude not performing the act of expulsion, but going with desire, and entering the hearing of language without talking about memory also becomes union, so expulsion etc. are said to be the union of that union, which is a misdeed. Asked, the downfall in the case of those two is a misdeed, and one should not receive a command in that case, and even if one receives a command, one will not transgress, the last is to eliminate the doubt that transgression will become a misdeed. The reason for becoming a misdeed is, as stated in the Commentary, "Because in this stage, strong attachment and sinful thoughts are less." Therefore, it is said that this is a misdeed. Also, the Commentary says, "In the stage of remembering, even if one remembers bad things, one will not completely abandon them, so knowing that strong attachment itself and sinful thoughts are also very strong, so at that time it is said to be a gross offense." Saying that after talking about remembering unpleasant things, not listening to language is a gross offense.