Back to the library

jl01 0002.determination of the collection of the general outline of the vidyadhara pitaka.commentary on the tenth chapter.g2.0f

Chinese

从而存活。在那之后,那个身体坏灭之后,也将确实地堕入无间地狱。如《匝纳嘎经》中所说,因为名为死主的行刑者完成了非天的进入,所以对长久存活的延续显现受用,如是宣说了转生于地狱之理。十一、以衡量方式衡量离名的法。如法之无我与心和物质相违。以执著之心视蕴等为空性。以思辨衡量无生之宗义。对此,若要成就空性之自性,不离证悟法之无我的真如,则必须成就胜者的心之自性,然而对于不住于名、词、文字之路的任何事物,以心和思量的分别念衡量五蕴的体性,将偶然产生的空性视为殊胜,则是背离了视五蕴自性为空性的密意。如《世间持经》所说:不了知五蕴的自性,不了知五蕴的体性是空性,因此与我争论。如是。总而言之,无生的宗义不住于以空性为例等思辨所衡量的对境之理,如《总经》所说:兰卡的自在者,在那秘密的界域中,世间没有可作比喻的事物。暂时为了接近显现,可以执取虚空,然而虚空也无法与之相比。因为世间没有比这更显现的比喻,所以譬如依赖虚空,从而了知。如是。因此,即使仅仅视为幻象,也只是对幻象之名、譬喻和体性执著的分别念,因此对于未脱离三轮的真实执著,即使宣称是持有清净见解的宗义,如果心中如此思辨,这也是根本堕落,如《古经》所说:法性不可衡量。如是。如果那样,对于进入道途的补特伽罗,不生起对法的我执,是否说在波罗蜜多中未获得第八地之前,以及在密咒中未获得意义的俱生之前,不会退转,所以无法成办呢?真实,从无法成办的角度来说,没有见到安立为根本堕落,如香提巴所说:不可用衡量方式衡量法。如是,对于法无我执著为我的

English

And thus live. After that, when that body is destroyed, one will surely fall into the Avici Hell. As stated in the "Tsanaga Sutra," because the executioner named the Lord of Death completed the entry of the Asura, he manifestly enjoyed the continuation of long life, as it is said that he was born in hell. Eleven, measuring the nameless Dharma with measurement. Like the selflessness of Dharma contradicting mind and matter. With the mind of clinging, viewing the aggregates as emptiness. Measuring the doctrine of unborn with speculation. Therefore, if one wants to accomplish the nature of emptiness, without separating from the suchness of realizing the selflessness of Dharma, then one must accomplish the nature of the Victorious One's mind. However, for anything that does not abide in the path of name, word, and letter, measuring the characteristics of the five aggregates with the speculation of mind and thought, considering the accidental emptiness as supreme, is turning away from the intention of viewing the five aggregates as empty by nature. As the "Holder of the World Sutra" says: Not knowing the nature of the five aggregates, not knowing that the characteristics of the five aggregates are emptiness, therefore arguing with me. Thus. In short, the doctrine of the unborn does not abide in the object of measurement by speculation such as taking emptiness as an example, as the "General Sutra" says: The lord of Lanka, in that secret realm, there is no example in the world. For the time being, in order to approach manifestation, one can grasp the sky, but even the sky cannot compare to it. Because there is no more manifest example in the world than that, therefore, for example, relying on the sky, thereby knowing. Thus. Therefore, even if it is only viewed as an illusion, it is only the speculation that clings to the name, example, and characteristics of the illusion. Therefore, for those who have not separated from the true clinging to the three spheres, even if they claim to hold the doctrine of pure view, if they speculate in this way in their minds, this is a root downfall, as the "Gur Sutra" says: The nature of Dharma cannot be measured. Thus. If that is the case, for a person who has entered the path, the self-grasping of Dharma does not arise, is it said that one will not regress until one has attained the eighth ground in the Paramita, and until one has attained the co-emergent meaning in the Mantra, so one cannot accomplish it? It is true that from the aspect of not being able to accomplish it, it is not seen as being established as a root downfall, as Shantipa said: The Dharma should not be measured with measurement. Thus, clinging to the selflessness of Dharma as self.