English
Saying "press on i" is like before. Grasp the sound of the meaningful i. Therefore, it will not become meaningless. Madhulihati. From the near translation, in the case of non-Sudur, before the ba of Labha is Khala and Ghanya. From the near translation, after the ba of Labha, that is, before the letter ba, Khala and Ghanya are behind or become the letter Agama. From the near translation, in the case of Sudur, the following will not change. Khala, Īṣatpralambhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: slightly, obtain), meaning easy to obtain. Because it says "for Īṣat Sunur etc.", it is Khala. This is Ma Agama. Ghanya, Upalambhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: obtain), obtaining things from Labhi is Ghanya. What does near translation mean? Aaiṣlallaabhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: easy to obtain), meaning easy to obtain, so like before it is Khala. So, here it says "Labhi Labha", why doesn't Agama change? It should be said that if it changes, the image of the word Labha will truly arise from the result, then what is the use of saying near translation? What does non-Sudur mean? Sulaabhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: easy to obtain), Durlabhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: difficult to obtain), is Khala. If that's the case, then how? Supralambhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: easy to obtain), Duṣpralambhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: difficult to obtain) is that so? It should be said that here it is not Labhi from behind Sudur. Then what is it? It is from the sound of Pra, a negative explanation should be made from Sudur alone. Therefore, Atisulabhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: very easy to obtain), Atidurlabhaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: very difficult to obtain). If that's the case, then how? Atisulabhaṃ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: very easy to obtain), Atidurlabhaṃ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: very difficult to obtain) is that so? It should be said that the sounds of Sulabha and Durlabha are combined, and then related to the sound of Ati behind. Because it is very easy to obtain, it is Atisulabhaṃ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: very easy to obtain). Similarly, Atidurlabhaṃ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: very difficult to obtain). From Ang behind Labhi, for the root starting with the letter Ya, the Agama of the letter Ma should be explained, Ālambhyaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: completely obtain). The phrase "completely obtain", at the end of Shakisahipa, also uses the word "po" to represent Ya. For Yana and Zekriita etc. are also not needed, Ālabhyate (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: being obtained), Ālallabhyate (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: being obtained). Because it says "very completely obtain", it is the sound of Ya. From Rati for Krita also has Na. When there is a root with the sound of Ratri, the Agama of the letter Ma may sometimes change. Rātri caraḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: night walker), Rāti caraḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: night walker). Because it says "night walker", from Zari it is Ta. Rātrī maṭaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: night's abode), Rātryaṭaḥ (Sanskrit Devanagari, Sanskrit Romanization, Chinese literal meaning: night's abode). Because it says "night walker", from Za etc., because of "Acao", it is Acao.