Chinese
以分别而区分。 于彼之体性而确定。 自之特征即自体之义。 非为一体之自体， 亦非作片段。 此乃分别之错谬。 一法无随行， 所除与除之境， 不解特征之不同， 以无区分而混淆故。 知晓混为一， 自性亦各异， 于某些则施设， 证成非他者。 若非彼，从体性而返， 仅事物之自特征， 凡是何者所作， 随行无有相违。 何处非聚集， 有返还之自特征， 于彼无火之返还， 有自之特征也。 譬如似此墙壁， 有非烟之返还。 是故从非火返还， 此乃有之自特征。 从无有如人角等， 凡是返还即自特征， 彼皆从显现亦返还， 如慧与灯火等。 如是声等自特征， 此亦非无有之体性， 如是未示区分者， 如是成为随行二者。 亦非欲说区分者， 彼即如是而宣说。 总相之特征， 亦为非他非不欲故。 于杂色之子不同， 与黄色之子及马相似， 完全舍弃速行后， 为何唯入于牛？ 彼乃能显现之自体， 若欲彼即是， 纵然与犛牛相似， 彼能力非马之。 如是之混杂， 于何事物而有者， 于彼虽无牛之种姓， 然除遣非牛则入。 凡从非牛返还之事物， 彼乃由根识所确定， 于影像中而确定， 亦由自证而了知。 以此见故世间人， 于彼施设声音。 于关联之体验中， 故此理应能显现。 如是之混杂， 于何事物而无有者， 牛以下声音所诠释， 彼乃明晰之了知者。 知晓各自之混杂， 牛与非牛亦成立， 唯一成立之声音， 如欲而施设彼。
English
Distinguishing by conceptualization. It is certain in its essence. One's own characteristic is the meaning of self-nature. It is not the nature of one, Nor is it making fragments. This is the error of conceptualization. Even without a single dharma following, What is to be eliminated and the object of elimination, Not understanding the difference in characteristics, Because of mixing without distinction. Knowing the mixing into one, Even though they are different by nature, For some, there is application, It is proven that it is not other. If not that, reversing from the essence, The self-characteristic of just the object, Whatever is done by that, There is no contradiction in following. Where there is no gathering, There is a self-characteristic of reversal. There, the reversal from no fire, There is a self-characteristic. For example, like this wall, There is a reversal from not being smoke. Therefore, reversing from not being fire, This is the self-characteristic of existence. From the absence of things like human horns, Whatever is reversed is the self-characteristic, All of that is also reversed from manifestation, Like wisdom and candlelight. Likewise, the self-characteristic of sound, etc., This is also not the nature of non-existence, Thus, those who have not shown distinction, Thus, they become two that follow. Also, not wanting to express distinction, That itself is completely proclaimed. The characteristic of the general, Is also because it is neither other nor unwanted. Different from the son of a speckled cow, If similar to a yellow son and a horse, Having completely abandoned quick movement, Why only enter into a cow? That is the self-nature of being able to manifest, If you want it to be that itself, Even if it is similar to a yak, That ability is not of a horse. Such a mixture, Whatever object exists in, Although there is no cow lineage in that, However, eliminating non-cow enters. Whatever object reverses from non-cow, That is definitely determined by the sense power. It is certain in the image, It is also understood by self-awareness. Because the world sees this, Sound is applied to that. Also in the experience of connection, Therefore, this is reasonable to manifest. Such a mixture, Because whatever object does not exist in, Sound below cow is the object to be expressed, That is the clear understander. Knowing the mixture of each, Cow and non-cow are also accomplished, The sound that is solely accomplished, Apply that as desired.
Chinese
能作。事物的差别知识，不依赖于执著于他者，因此，此中不存在一个指示另一个的过失。不了解外在的真相，是因为对自性本身感到迷惑，因此，声音和智慧必定将自相作为外在的对境。声音仅仅是做到那一点，但声音甚至无法触及意义。一些具有差别的意义，不是通过排除来表达的。对于从其他意义中返回，具有差别者也是，无论立宗者如何宣说，这都是想要表达的意义。 什么是与他者相异的事物？是通过原因还是通过作用？由于具有差别者是不同的，因此，与种类不混合或混合。通过表达树等声音，从产生的知识中，阻止了种类等。凡是存在于智慧中的形象，为了在此产生表达，返回的差别者，那些都是刚刚被指出的。通过从其他意义中返回，事物的一些部分，无论说什么都是分别，那只是影像本身。依赖于看到从其他意义中返回的事物，附加于由此而来的事物，并指出那是它的一部分。原因的意义和作用的意义，因此，也如先前一样是自性。如果事物与种类不同，返回和它以及像那样，从非牛返回的另一个，那也是存在于自性中。表达返回也是不存在的，不是仅仅从一个返回，因为它也是从差别事物中产生，因此，事物的智慧不会消失。区分的这个差别者，也是由分别所变现的，因此，通过执持这个法，具有差别并被安立。因此，那就像地等一样，是产生差别的原因。各自相违的声音的意义，那就是有心者所指出的。无法区分所见和分别，世人认为那是外在的。因此，由于对此的执著，将显现的事物作为表达的对象。已经证实，那本身不是声音的表达对象。因为这是声音的表达对象，所以显现的事物也是应该排除的。总的来说不是排除，排除本身也不是事物。
English
Can do. The knowledge of the distinction of things does not depend on clinging to others, therefore, there is no fault in this of one pointing to another. Not understanding the external truth is because of being confused about the nature itself, therefore, sound and wisdom must take the self-aspect as the external object. Sound only does that, but sound cannot even touch the meaning. Some meanings that have differences are not expressed by exclusion. For returning from other meanings, the one with differences is also, no matter how the proponent declares, this is the meaning that wants to be expressed. What is a thing that is different from another? Is it through cause or through action? Because the one with differences is different, therefore, it does not mix or mix with the kind. By expressing sounds such as trees, from the knowledge that arises, the kind etc. are prevented. Whatever image exists in wisdom, in order to generate expression here, the differentiator of returning, those are the ones that have just been pointed out. By returning from other meanings, some parts of things, whatever is said to be distinction, that is just the image itself. Relying on seeing things returning from other meanings, attaching to what comes from this, and pointing out that it is part of it. The meaning of cause and the meaning of action, therefore, are also the self-nature as before. If things are different from the kind, returning and it and like that, another returning from non-cow, that is also present in the self-nature. Expressing return is also non-existent, not just returning from one, because it also arises from different things, therefore, the wisdom of things does not disappear. This differentiator of distinguishing is also manifested by distinction, therefore, by holding this dharma, it has differences and is established. Therefore, that is like earth etc., it is the cause of generating differences. The meaning of the sounds that contradict each other, that is what the mindful one has pointed out. Unable to distinguish between what is seen and distinction, people think that it is external. Therefore, due to attachment to this, the things that appear are taken as the object of expression. It has been proven that that itself is not the object of expression of sound. Because this is the object of expression of sound, the things that appear are also to be excluded. In general, it is not exclusion, exclusion itself is not a thing.