Chinese
是因为加入了系属的词语的缘故。所谓具有那些特征，是指能够产生知识，并且对他者产生差别，也就是能起作用和自然成立。所谓“这不可能成为因缘”，是指知道“没有瓶子，这个就没有”的知识。为了驳斥自续派的量，所以说了“具有见到的紧随其后”。对于您和我来说，共同成立的见到，是无分别的紧随其后的知识，仅仅从见到的力量产生，并且仅仅随顺它。所谓“由它的力量产生”，是指由事物的力量，不是自愿或者从标志产生。那个知识也是因为能在事物本身中起作用，也就是说，能够理解，因为知识本身已经完全确定，所以最初没有知识理解的那个，才成为那个事物的量。这样，以一种方式见到，产生以一种方式确定的分别，由于一种确定的力量，所以没有必要遮止从一种之外的其他。为了遮止，只有前者才是量，由于从它的力量产生，随顺它，所以没有理解，没有理解，具有分别的，不是自续派的量。如果见到与其他的形象混合，就不会见到，因为不会产生知道的理解。为了总结那些，所以说了“因此”。因为仅仅通过见到就已经理解了那个事物，而且具有分别的那个也是从见到的力量产生的缘故，所以不是自愿理解的缘故。为了具体显示由他者的力量产生的那个，所以加上了“不依赖于根”，也加上了“这表示不是依赖于禅定”。因此，认为是现量。因为是确定外境的知识，所以没有怀疑是自证。因为不依赖于正确的标志，所以不是比量。所谓“因此”，是因为仅仅通过见到就已经理解了蓝色，所以对它的确定理解，仅仅是对蓝色本身进行理解，因为没有理解没有理解的事物之法，所以那不是量。为了显示依赖于显现的不明显，所以没有见到
English
It is because the word of belonging is added. The so-called having those characteristics means being able to generate knowledge and create differences for others, that is, being able to function and be naturally established. The so-called "this cannot become a cause" means knowing the knowledge of "no pot, this does not exist." In order to refute the Svātantrika's valid cognition, it is said that "it has the immediately following of seeing." For you and me, the seeing that is jointly established is the immediately following knowledge without discrimination, which arises only from the power of seeing and only follows it. The so-called "arising from its power" means from the power of things, not voluntarily or from signs. That knowledge is also because it can function in the thing itself, that is, it can be understood, because the knowledge itself has been completely determined, so that the first one without knowledge and understanding becomes the valid cognition of that thing. In this way, seeing in one way produces a determination of discrimination in one way, and because of the power of one determination, there is no need to prevent others from being outside of one. In order to prevent, only the former is valid cognition, because it arises from its power and follows it, so there is no understanding, no understanding, and the one with discrimination is not the Svātantrika's valid cognition. If seeing is mixed with other images, it will not be seen, because the understanding of knowing will not arise. In order to summarize those, it is said "therefore." Because that thing has already been understood only through seeing, and the one with discrimination also arises from the power of seeing, it is not understood voluntarily. In order to specifically show that which is produced by the power of others, it is added that "it does not depend on the root," and it is also added that "this means that it does not depend on meditation." Therefore, it is considered to be direct perception. Because it is the knowledge of determining the external object, there is no doubt that it is self-awareness. Because it does not depend on correct signs, it is not inference. The so-called "therefore" is because blue has already been understood only through seeing, so the definite understanding of it is only to understand the blue itself, because there is no understanding of the Dharma of things that have not been understood, so that is not valid cognition. In order to show the inconspicuousness that depends on appearance, it is not seen.