Chinese
然而，如果认为声音只是专注于自身的特征，为了理解与自身特征相符的法所区分的事物呢？那么，在这种情况下，声音所显现的事物本身就会被包含，而不是其他事物，因为那样太过分了。所说的“如果也包含其他事物”就是指，也包含马的情况，因为那样太过分了。如果说声音把握的是具有该特征的事物，那么无限的过失就会出现，否则，普遍性又有什么用呢？等等，这些都已经说过了。为了说明声音把握的是种姓本身，并且由于可把握的普遍性不具备作用，因此不会包含在内，这种辩论也是不成立的。因此，才说了“即使把握种姓”。因为凭借什么，声音会包含在随行者中，而不包含在与此相反者中呢？从没有随行者中，可以理解到作用，而从与此相反者中，则不能理解到作用。对于通过现量来理解种姓和显现，就像瓶子和布匹一样，它们之间没有混杂的自性，因此无法理解。凭借什么，从普遍认知的声音中，追求意义不会包含在内呢？因为它们是相符的，聚集在一起，因此被理解为混杂的自性。从什么中可以理解到作用，从什么中不能理解到作用，这种差别性的理解是不存在的。因此，凭借自身的特征，对于已经转变为与自性相违背的事物，无法理解其他事物，然而，迷惑者们将无法理解。例如，就像杂色母牛等等一样，即使抛弃了这些，仍然存在普遍的认知。如果缺少了什么，那么与没有种姓认知的显现自性，以及与种姓认知混杂显现的事物，就不会超越，例如，就像作用的事物，或者仅仅是显现的自性一样。因此，种姓的认知显现，就是颜色的显现形态。因此，即使在理智中，也不会舍弃不迷惑的自身特征之法，因为没有认知，所以追求作用的事物，才会被包含在追求意义之中，这才是合理的，如果这样认为，那是不对的，这就是所说的“在这种情况下”。如果在智慧中显现为混杂，那么就不是不同的种姓了，并且
English
However, if it is thought that sound only focuses on its own characteristics, in order to understand the things distinguished by the dharma that corresponds to its own characteristics? Then, in this case, the very thing that sound manifests will be included, not other things, because that would be too extreme. The statement "if it also includes other things" refers to the case of including horses, because that would be too extreme. If it is said that sound grasps the thing that possesses that characteristic, then the fault of infinity will occur, otherwise, what is the use of universality? Etc., these have already been said. In order to explain that sound grasps the genus itself, and because the graspable generality does not have a function, it will not be included, this debate is also not valid. Therefore, it was said, "even if grasping the genus." Because by what means will sound be included in the follower, and not included in the opposite of this? From the absence of a follower, it can be understood that there is a function, while from the opposite of this, it cannot be understood that there is a function. For the understanding of genus and manifestation through direct perception, just like pots and cloths, they do not have a mixed nature between them, so they cannot be understood. By what means will the pursuit of meaning not be included from the sound of universal cognition? Because they are compatible, gathered together, so they are understood as a mixed nature. From what can it be understood that there is a function, and from what can it not be understood that there is a function, this differential understanding does not exist. Therefore, by means of its own characteristics, for things that have been transformed into something contrary to their own nature, other things cannot be understood, however, those who are deluded will not be able to understand. For example, just like mottled cows, etc., even if these are abandoned, there is still universal cognition. If something is missing, then the nature of manifestation without genus cognition, and the things that appear mixed with genus cognition, will not be transcended, for example, just like things that function, or just the nature of manifestation. Therefore, the cognition manifestation of genus is the manifestation form of color. Therefore, even in reason, the dharma of one's own characteristics that is not deluded will not be abandoned, because there is no cognition, so the things that function will be included in the pursuit of meaning, this is reasonable, if it is thought that way, that is not right, this is what is said, "in this case." If it appears mixed in wisdom, then it is not a different genus, and