Back to the library

DTG174 0014.《A Commentary on the Compendium on Valid Cognition, Glorious Dharmakīrti.》A Commentary on the Compendium on Valid Cognition, Glorious Dharmakīrti..A Commentary on the Compendium on Valid Cognition, Glorious Dharmakīrti..g2.0f

Chinese

如果说是依赖于仪轨的缘故,如果依赖就有无意义的过失。如果从咒语的仪轨或者其他获得某种殊胜的自性,那么就依赖于它的能力,但对于常法来说,这并不存在,如是已说。因此,对于没有能力者,为何要依赖呢?这样一来,如果不依赖,要么恒常作用,要么丝毫也不作用,因为没有差别的缘故。如果事物具有那样的能力,那么它们就成为一切的成办者。不是善妙的行为,对于作者的差别是不应依赖的。如果事物仅凭能力就能通过咒语给予成就,那么它们就不会舍弃供养或其他的任何事物。对于其他来说,不会成为自性的那种体性,因为它不会受到它的责骂,也不会受到其他的赞扬。任何事物也不会同时成为因和果的体性,因为没有亲近和劫数。正因为如此,如果这不是善妙的行为,作者也不存在,那么作者从何处获得果报呢?而且,有为法的事物,事物的差别会产生差别。对于行为的普遍性是确定的,对于能力不是,而是对于约定俗成。如果无常的事物具有行为的差别,那么它们就与它们的因自性不同。正因为从中获得殊胜,否则就会变成其他的形态,如果没有差别,那就不是,因为如果没有因的差别,就没有果的差别。如果存在差别,那么就会陷入无因的过失,如是已多次宣说。因此,为了自性殊胜的缘故,即使这个产生果的咒语已经是果,对于贱民等行为也不会变成其他的形态,因为贱民和婆罗门等人的自性没有差别。随顺人们意愿的名称和术语的差别,与自性的差别相关的意义并非其他。如果它们有种姓的差别,那么那是形状和

English

If it is said that it is because of relying on the ritual, if there is reliance, there will be the fault of meaninglessness. If some excellent nature is obtained from the ritual of mantras or from others, then it will depend on its power, but this does not exist for the constant Dharma, as has been said. Therefore, why rely on this which has no power? In this way, if there is no reliance, either it always acts or it does not act at all, because there is no difference. If things have such power, then they become the accomplisher of everything. Not a good deed, one should not rely on the difference of the author. If things can give accomplishment through mantras by their own power, then they will not abandon offerings or anything else. For others, it will not become the nature of that nature, because it will not be blamed by it, nor will it be praised by others. Nothing can be the nature of cause and effect at the same time, because there is no closeness and kalpa. Precisely because of this, if this is not a good deed, and the author does not exist, then from where does the author obtain the fruit? Moreover, for conditioned things, the difference of things will produce difference. The universality of action is certain, not for ability, but for convention. If impermanent things have the difference of action, then they are different in nature from their cause. Precisely because of obtaining excellence from it, otherwise it will become another form, if there is no difference, then it is not, because if there is no difference of cause, there is no difference of effect. If there is a difference, then one will fall into the fault of having no cause, as has been said many times. Therefore, for the sake of the excellence of nature, even if this mantra that produces fruit is already a fruit, it will not become another form for the actions of the lowly people, because there is no difference in the nature of the lowly people and the Brahmins. The difference of names and terms that follow people's wishes, the meanings related to the difference of nature are not other. If they have a difference of caste, then that is shape and