Chinese
总而言之，所说的内容概括起来：颜色从一种颜色变成另一种不同的颜色，那就是另一种颜色，那就是另一个边界。所谓“中间边界”，就是概括了“边界”这个词，它概括了门扇、墙壁和篱笆等有中间边界的事物。所谓“障碍”，就是概括了田地等的垄脊等，像这样，虽然垄脊的两侧都属于同一范围，但正因为这两侧所处的地面的两部分之间存在阻隔，所以位于中间就变成了边界。如果挖掘的坑洞被完全填满，那就被说成是一个方向。如果坑洞没有被填满，而是被泥土阻隔，或者被墙壁阻隔，或者被篱笆阻隔，那么这些都应该被说成是不同的方向，所有这些都被“障碍”这个词所概括。为了消除对动物身体是一个整体，所以障碍也是一个整体的疑虑，所以说“对于动物来说，肋骨等可以被区分开来的事物就是障碍”，也就是说，对于动物来说，肋骨等可以被区分开来，因此应该认识到它们是作为不同的障碍而存在的。所谓“等等”，就是概括了牙齿和鼻子之间的阻隔等等，因此，如果一根肋骨从一侧移动到另一根可以区分开来的不同的肋骨之间，那就可以被说成是偷盗。为了消除对土地等被草等覆盖的事物，土地等是基础之物，所以是位置，而覆盖物不是位置的疑虑，所以说“铺设垫子就是位置”，也就是说，如果在土地等的基础上铺设了草等的垫子，那么，铺设的草等的垫子本身就是位于那里的物质，所以就是位置。土地等不是位置，因为它们被垫子阻隔了。所谓“生长就像放置一样”，也就是说，草和苔藓，以及树木和森林等生长出来，就像仅仅移动放置的物体就被说成是偷盗一样，生长也仅仅是从位置上移动就被称为偷盗，而不是仅仅从根部拔出。
English
In summary, what has been said is summarized: When a color changes from one color to another different color, that is another color, that is another boundary. The so-called "intermediate boundary" is a summary of the word "boundary," and it summarizes things that have intermediate boundaries, such as doors, walls, and fences. The so-called "obstacle" is a summary of ridges in fields, etc. Like this, although both sides of a ridge belong to the same area, it becomes a boundary because there is a barrier between the two parts of the ground on which these two sides are located. If the excavated pit is completely filled, it is said to be one direction. If the pit is not filled, but is blocked by soil, or blocked by a wall, or blocked by a fence, then these should be said to be different directions, and all of these are summarized by the word "obstacle." To dispel the doubt that an animal's body is a whole, so the obstacle is also a whole, it is said that "for animals, things that can be distinguished, such as ribs, are obstacles," that is, for animals, ribs, etc., can be distinguished, so it should be recognized that they exist as different obstacles. The so-called "etc." summarizes the barriers between teeth and noses, etc. Therefore, if a rib moves from one side to another different rib that can be distinguished, it can be said to be theft. To dispel the doubt that for things like land covered by grass, etc., the land is the foundation, so it is the location, while the covering is not the location, it is said that "laying a mat is the location," that is, if a mat of grass, etc., is laid on the foundation of land, etc., then the mat of grass, etc., itself is the substance located there, so it is the location. Land, etc., is not the location because it is blocked by the mat. The so-called "growth is like placement" means that the growth of grass and moss, as well as trees and forests, etc., is like merely moving a placed object is said to be theft, growth is also called theft merely by moving from a location, not merely by pulling out from the root.
Chinese
不是的，应该这样全部拿走。这里经文说，比丘拔起花树，在没有偷盗之前会犯下罪行。从偷盗到移动位置之间被称为偷盗，应该计算花树的价值。如果手臂等肢体上佩戴了手镯等装饰品，因为迷惑，应该如何安立为偷盗呢？因此，说了“佩戴即是偷盗”，即手臂等佩戴的物品，取下就是偷盗。手臂等肢体上佩戴、系上、穿着和分配的物品，从肢体上取下、解开和分离时，应该知道那就是偷盗。这里经文说，如果比丘用各种装饰品装饰，通过其行为从床上站起来，从一个地方移动到另一个地方，就被称为偷盗等等。这里所说的从一个地方移动到另一个地方，应该理解为取下。否则，手臂等处佩戴的装饰品，在手臂上移动，或者可以移动到手腕，但无法取下，仅仅是移动位置怎么会变成偷盗呢？因此，从手臂等处取下才是偷盗。税卡在自己的位置上，怎么会变成偷盗呢？因此，说了“税卡超过了地面”，并将其与偷盗联系起来。税卡的位置在这里用“地面”这个词来表示，超过了地面，即税卡超过了那个地方就是超过了。进入不缴纳税卡的位置多久，就必须缴纳税卡，那个地方就是税卡的位置，应该知道，这里就称为税卡。这样，这里的词义是这样的：税卡的物品到达必须缴纳税卡的税卡位置，如果没有缴纳税卡就超过了税卡的位置，那就是偷盗税卡。像这样，即使超过了必须缴纳税卡的地方，也只是偷盗了税卡的量，而不是其他。说了“超过了那个地面”这句话。
English
It is not, it should be taken away completely like this. Here the scripture says that if a monk uproots a flower tree, he will commit a sin until he steals it. From stealing to moving the position is called stealing, and the value of the flower tree should be calculated. If bracelets and other ornaments are worn on the arms and other limbs, how should it be established as stealing because of confusion? Therefore, it is said that "wearing is stealing", that is, the items worn on the arms and other parts, taking them off is stealing. When the items worn, tied, worn, and distributed on the arms and other limbs are taken off, untied, and separated from the limbs, it should be known that it is stealing. Here the scripture says that if a monk is decorated with various ornaments, and through his actions rises from the bed and moves from one place to another, it is called stealing and so on. Here, moving from one place to another should be understood as taking off. Otherwise, the ornaments worn on the arms and other parts, moving on the arms, or can be moved to the wrist, but cannot be taken off, how can it become stealing just by moving the position? Therefore, taking it off from the arms and other parts is stealing. How can the toll gate be stolen because it is in its own position? Therefore, it is said that "the toll gate has exceeded the ground" and it is connected with stealing. The position of the toll gate is expressed here by the word "ground", and exceeding the ground means that the toll gate exceeding that place is exceeding. How long does it take to enter the position where the toll gate is not paid, and the toll gate must be paid, that place is the position of the toll gate, it should be known, and it is called the toll gate here. In this way, the meaning of the word here is this: the item of the toll gate arrives at the toll gate position where the toll gate must be paid, and if the toll gate position is exceeded without paying the toll gate, it is stealing the toll gate. Like this, even if the place where the toll gate must be paid is exceeded, only the amount of the toll gate is stolen, not the others. The sentence "exceeded that ground" is said.
Tibetan
གིས་ནི་འདིར་གཞན་ནས་གཞན་དུ་བརྒྱུད་བ་ཐམས་ཅད་ཀྱང་བསྡུས་བར་རིག་པར་བྱའོ། །འདི་ལྟར་བཞོན་པ་གླང་པོ་ཆེ་དང་རྟ་ལ་སོགས་པ་དང་རང་གི་ལུས་ཀྱི་རྐང་ལག་ལ་སོགས་པ་དང༌། མདའ་ལ་སོགས་པ་ལ་བཏགས་ཏེ་བསྐུར་བའི་ཐབས་དེ་དག་གིས་ཤོ་གམ་གཞལ་དགོས་པའི་ས་ལས་འདས་ན་ཡང་ཤོ་གམ་གྱི་གནས་དེ་ལས་འདས་པ་ཁོ་ན་ཡིན་ནོ། །འདི་ལྟར་དེ་ཤོ་གམ་གྱི་སར་གཏོགས་པ་ཡིན་ན་གལ་ཏེ་ཤོ་གམ་གྱི་གནས་སུ་ཤོ་གམ་གཞལ་དགོས་པར་ཕྱིན་ནས་ཡང་ཕྱིར་ལོག་གམ་སྐབས་སུ་བཟུར་ཏེ་འགྲོ་བ་དེ་ལ་ནི་ཡུལ་ཆོས་གང་ཡིན་པའི་ཁྲིམས་དང་སྦྱར་བར་བྱ་སྟེ། འདི་ལྟར་ཡུལ་དེ་ན་གལ་ཏེ་ཕྱིར་ལོག་ཀྱང་གཞལ་དགོས་པའི་ཁྲིམས་སུ་བྱས་པ་ཡོད་ན་ནི་འདས་པ་ཁོ་ནར་འགྱུར་རོ། །ཇི་སྟེ་ཕྱིར་ལོག་ན་གཞལ་མི་དགོས་པའི་ཁྲིམས་སུ་བྱས་པ་ཡོད་ན་ནི་འདས་པར་མི་འགྱུར་རོ། །མི་ནི་འགྲོ་བ་དང་འོང་བ་ལ་སོགས་པ་དང་ལྡན་པ་ཡིན་ན་དེ་ཇི་ལྟར་བརྐུས་པར་འགྱུར་ཞེ་ན། དེའི་ཕྱིར་མི་ལ་གལ་ཏེ་བརྡས་ན་ནི་དེ་གྲུབ་ནའོ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་སྨྲས་ཏེ། མི་རྐུ་བ་ནི་རྣམ་པ་མང་དུ་སྣང་སྟེ། མི་འདོད་བཞིན་དུ་བཀྲི་བ་དང༌། གཞན་པ་དག་གིས་རྐུ་བ་དང༌། དེ་བཞིན་དུ་བསྡིགས་པ་ལ་སོགས་པ་དག་གིས་རྐུ་བ་དག་སྟེ། དེ་དག་ནི་མདོ་འདིར་མ་བསམས་སོ། །འདིར་ནི་གལ་ཏེ་བརྡས་ནི་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་བསམས་ཏེ། གལ་ཏེ་བརྡས་མི་རྐུ་བར་བྱེད་ན་བརྡ་དེ་གྲུབ་ན་བརྐུས་པ་ཡིན་ནོ། །འདི་སྐད་བསྟན་ཏེ། གལ་ཏེ་བརྡས་རྐུ་བར་བྱེད་ན་གང་གི་ཚེ་བརྡ་དེ་གྲུབ་པ་དེའི་ཚེ་ན་མི་དེ་བརྐུས་བར་བརྗོད་པར་བྱའོ། །འདི་ལྟར་གཞུང་ལས་མི་རྐུ་བ་རྣམ་པ་གསུམ་པོ་ཡུལ་ཕྱོགས་དང་མཚན་མ་དང་ བརྡས་རྐུ་བ་གསུམ་གསུངས་པ་ཡང་འདིར་བརྡ་ཞེས་སྨོས་པས་གཉིས་ཀྱང་བསྡུས་པར་རིག་པར་བྱ་སྟེ། འདིར་མི་རྐུ་བ་ནི་རང་དགར་ཕྱི་བཞིན་འོང་བ་དང༌། ཁས་ལེན་པ་ཡིན་པར་དགོངས་པས་དེ་ལྟ་བུས་རྐུ་བ་ཐམས་ཅད་ནི་བརྡ་སྔོན་དུ་བཏང་བ་ཡིན་ནོ། །དེ་ལ་ཡུལ་ཕྱོགས་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ནི་འདིར་ཚོགས་ལ་སོགས་པའི་ཡུལ་ཡིན་པར་གསུངས་སོ། །མཚན་མ་ནི་བརྟགས་ཏེ་སྐྲ་དང་ཁ་སྤུ་བྲེ་གས་ནས་རིང་པོ་མ་ལོན་པ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ལ་སོགས་པའོ། །བརྡ་ནི་སྔ་དྲོ་ལ་སོགས་པའོ། །མདོ་ལ་ས་ནི་བརྡ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་འདན་ཚབ་སྦྱར་བ་ཡིན་པར་འདོད་དེ། གང་གི་ཚེ་ཁྱོད་ཀྱིས་ཁོ་བོས་འདི་དང་འདི་ལྟ་བུར་མཐོང་བ་དེའི་ཚེ་ཁྱོད་ཁོ་བོའི་གན་དུ་ཤོག་ཤིག་ཅེས་བྱ་བ་ལྟ་བུ་སྟེ། གང་གི་ཚེ་བརྡ་དེ་གྲུབ་པ་དེའི་ཚེ་མི་དེ་བརྐུས་པར་རིག་པར་བྱའོ། །གལ་ཏེ་གསང་སྔག
Chinese
因此，应当理解为，这里也包括了从一个地方转移到另一个地方的所有情况。例如，骑乘大象、马等，以及将自己的身体的腿脚等，弓箭等捆绑后转移的方法，即使超过了需要测量“肖冈”的地方，也仅仅是超过了“肖冈”的位置而已。如果它属于“肖冈”的地方，那么如果到了“肖冈”的位置需要测量“肖冈”时，又返回或暂时躲避而走，那么就应当与当地的法律相结合。例如，如果那个地方有即使返回也需要测量的法律，那么就一定会超过。如果返回时有不需要测量的法律，那么就不会超过。如果人具有行走等能力，那么这怎么能算是偷盗呢？因此，对于人，如果约定了，就说了“那么就成立了”。偷人有很多种情况，比如不情愿地被带走，被其他人偷走，以及被恐吓等偷走。这些在本经中没有考虑。这里考虑的是“如果约定了”，如果约定偷人，那么约定成立了就是偷盗。这样教导说：如果约定偷盗，那么在约定成立的时候，就应当说这个人被偷盗了。像这样，经文中说的偷人三种方式，即地域、标志和约定偷盗三种，这里仅仅说了“约定”，也应当理解为包括了前两种。这里认为偷人是自愿地跟随而来，并且是承诺了的，因此所有这样的偷盗都是事先约定好的。其中，地域指的是集会等的场所。标志指的是检查头发和胡须，剪短后还没有长长等。约定指的是早晨等。经文中“约定”这个词，被认为是添加了“འདན་ཚབ་”的，例如，当你看我像这样的时候，你就到我这里来，等等。当约定成立的时候，就应当知道这个人被偷盗了。如果秘密咒语...
English
Therefore, it should be understood that all cases of transferring from one place to another are also included here. For example, riding elephants, horses, etc., and methods of transferring by tying one's own body's legs, feet, etc., bows and arrows, etc., even if it exceeds the place where "Shogam" needs to be measured, it only exceeds the position of "Shogam." If it belongs to the place of "Shogam," then if it goes to the position of "Shogam" where "Shogam" needs to be measured, and then returns or temporarily evades and leaves, then it should be combined with the local law. For example, if that place has a law that even if it returns, it needs to be measured, then it will definitely exceed. If there is a law that it does not need to be measured when returning, then it will not exceed. If a person has the ability to walk, etc., then how can this be considered theft? Therefore, for a person, if there is an agreement, then it is said, "Then it is established." There are many kinds of stealing people, such as being taken away unwillingly, being stolen by others, and being stolen by intimidation, etc. These are not considered in this sutra. Here, it is considered "if there is an agreement," if there is an agreement to steal a person, then the agreement being established is theft. It is taught like this: if there is an agreement to steal, then at the time when the agreement is established, it should be said that this person has been stolen. Like this, the three ways of stealing people mentioned in the scriptures, namely, region, sign, and agreement stealing, here only "agreement" is mentioned, and it should be understood that the previous two are also included. Here, it is considered that stealing a person is voluntarily following and has been promised, so all such stealing is agreed upon in advance. Among them, region refers to places such as gatherings. Signs refer to examining hair and beard, cutting them short and not yet growing long, etc. Agreement refers to morning, etc. The word "agreement" in the sutra is considered to have added "འདན་ཚབ་", for example, when you see me like this, you come to me, etc. When the agreement is established, it should be known that this person has been stolen. If secret mantra...