Chinese
哦，这是特别之处，意思是断尽一切烦恼的同义词。精进和道路自然生起的原因是，精进是指具有精进，是发起精进的同义词。因为这里有道路自然生起，所以是道路自然生起。如何道路自然生起呢？因为不作意而显现。这既是精进，也是道路自然生起，所以是精进和道路自然生起。这是它的体性。因此，仅仅是出生就不会死亡而完全入灭。这也是因为没有蕴的残余。其他一些人说，简而言之，只有获得阿罗汉果后，寿命没有完全结束，通过没有蕴的残余的涅槃而入灭，不仅是入灭，而且出生后入灭也与此相同。不是的，因为没有舍弃寿命的自在。意思是说，这也是因为没有蕴的残余，所以不是这样的。为什么呢？因为没有舍弃寿命的自在，因为他没有舍弃寿命的自在。又为什么这个没有那个自在呢？例如，获得有边际的第四禅的人有舍弃寿命的自在，而有边际的禅定也在三洲中人们之中产生，那是因为生于色界之中。中阴身入灭有舍弃寿命的自在吗？因为什么缘故这样说，例如通过没有蕴的残余的入灭而入灭呢？对此也没有自在，但是对于住在中阴身中的人来说，没有像出生后入灭的那样的业。因此，中阴身入灭是迅速入灭，而出生后入灭是寿命存在多久就存在多久然后入灭，所以只有出生后入灭才是具有蕴的残余的入灭而入灭。
English
Oh, this is the distinction, meaning it is synonymous with exhausting all defilements. The reason for diligence and the natural arising of the path is that diligence means having diligence, which is synonymous with initiating diligence. Because there is a natural arising of the path here, it is the natural arising of the path. How does the path arise naturally? Because it appears without intention. This is both diligence and the natural arising of the path, so it is diligence and the natural arising of the path. This is its nature. Therefore, merely being born, one will not die but will completely pass into nirvana. This is also because there are no remaining aggregates. Some others say that, in short, only after attaining the Arhatship, without the complete end of life, one passes into nirvana through the nirvana without the remaining aggregates, it is not only passing into nirvana, but also the nirvana after birth is the same as this. No, because there is no freedom to abandon life. It means that this is also because there are no remaining aggregates, so it is not like that. Why? Because there is no freedom to abandon life, because he has no freedom to abandon life. And why does this one not have that freedom? For example, one who has attained the fourth dhyana of the limit has the freedom to abandon life, and that dhyana of the limit also arises among people in the three continents, that is because it is born in the realm of form. Does the intermediate being have the freedom to abandon life when passing into nirvana? For what reason is this said, for example, passing into nirvana through the nirvana without the remaining aggregates? There is also no freedom for this, but for those who dwell in the intermediate state, there is no such karma as those who pass into nirvana after birth. Therefore, passing into nirvana in the intermediate state is quickly passing into nirvana, while passing into nirvana after birth is existing as long as life exists and then passing into nirvana, so only passing into nirvana after birth is passing into nirvana with the remaining aggregates.
Chinese
“具有现行造作”等等，关于这一点，“宣说”这个词，是说分别说者的宗义。自己的宗义，之后会按照符合经部的观点来解释。 “没有舍弃串习”的意思是，由于先前串习的力量，没有舍弃串习，这是它的同义词，即具有现行造作并且具有努力。 “因为具有现行精进并且道不是自然生起”的意思是，因为瑜伽行者具有现行精进，并且道不是自然生起，正因为如此，此人通过具有现行造作而证得完全的寂灭。 “没有现行造作”的意思是与前者相反，即因为舍弃了串习。 “因为没有现行精进并且道不是自然生起”的意思是，没有现行精进，即因为没有精进，并且道不是自然生起，这是它的同义词。 因此，正因为如此，由于现行精进等等这些是不同的，所以宣说了完全寂灭的差别。对于生起后完全寂灭的人来说，具有现行精进和道自然生起这二者。对于具有现行造作而完全寂灭的人来说，具有现行精进，但对于此人来说，道不是自然生起。对于没有现行造作而完全寂灭的人来说，二者都没有，既没有现行精进，也没有道自然生起。 “因为以有为和无为为所缘的道而完全寂灭”关于这一点，有为和造作是一个意思，无为和非造作也与之相同。 哪一个以有为为所缘，即以痛苦和集，以及道为所缘的道，而断除烦恼，那是通过具有现行造作而完全寂灭。哪一个以无为为所缘，即以灭为所缘而断除，那是没有现行造作而完全寂灭。 这是不合理的，因为会变得太过分。
English
Regarding "with manifest activity," etc., the term "proclaims" indicates the tenets of the Vaibhashikas. One's own tenets will be explained later in accordance with the Sutra Pitaka. "Without abandoning practice" means that due to the power of previous practice, practice is not abandoned, which is synonymous with being with manifest activity and with effort. "Because of manifest exertion and because the path does not arise spontaneously" means that because the yogi has manifest exertion and because the path does not arise spontaneously, it is precisely for this reason that this person attains complete nirvana through being with manifest activity. "Without manifest activity" means the opposite of the former, that is, because practice has been abandoned. "Because there is no manifest exertion and the path does not arise spontaneously" means that there is no manifest exertion, that is, because there is no diligence, and the path does not arise spontaneously, which is its synonym. Therefore, it is because of this that the differences in complete nirvana are explained because manifest exertion and so on are different. For those who attain complete nirvana after being born, there are both manifest exertion and the spontaneous arising of the path. For those who attain complete nirvana with manifest activity, there is manifest exertion, but for this person, the path does not arise spontaneously. For those who attain complete nirvana without manifest activity, neither is present, neither manifest exertion nor the spontaneous arising of the path. Regarding "because of attaining complete nirvana through the path that focuses on the conditioned and the unconditioned," the conditioned and activity are the same meaning, and the unconditioned and non-activity are also the same. Whichever focuses on the conditioned, that is, the path that focuses on suffering, origin, and the path, and abandons afflictions, that is complete nirvana through being with manifest activity. Whichever focuses on the unconditioned, that is, abandons by focusing on cessation, that is complete nirvana without manifest activity. This is not reasonable, because it would become too extreme.
Tibetan
་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ནི་དེ་ནི་དེ་ལྟ་མ་ཡིན་ནོ། །ཅིའི་ཕྱིར་ཞེ་ན། ཧ་ཅང་ཐལ་བར་འགྱུར་བའི་ཕྱིར་ཏེ། བར་མ་དོ་དང༌། སྐྱེས་ནས་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་དག་ཀྱང་འདུས་བྱས་དང༌། འདུས་མ་བྱས་ལ་དམིགས་པའི་ལམ་གྱིས་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བས། སོ་སོར་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་དང་བཅས་པ་དང༌། མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པར་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་ཉིད་དུ་ཐལ་བར་འགྱུར་རོ། །དེའི་ཕྱིར་གང་ཟག་གཉིས་ཁོ་ནར་ཐལ་བར་འགྱུར་གྱི་ལྔ་ནི་མ་ཡིན་ནོ། །མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པར་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་སྔར་འབྱུང་བས་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ནི་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པར་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་འདི་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་དང་བཅས་པས་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་བས་སྔར་འབྱུང་ངོ༌། །དེ་ཁོ་ན་བཞིན་དུ་རུང་སྟེ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་རྒྱས་པར་འབྱུང་བ་ནི། གང་ཟག་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པ་དང༌། མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་དང་བཅས་པས་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་ལམ་ངང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་དང༌། ངང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་མ་ཡིན་པ་དག་གིས་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་དག་ནི་གོ་རིམས་བཞིན་དུ་སྔ་མ་ནི་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པས་བསྒྲུབ་པར་བྱ་བ་ཡིན་པའི་ཕྱིར་ལ། ཅིག་ཤོས་ནི་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པས་མངོན་པར་བསྒྲུབ་པར་བྱ་བ་ཡིན་པའི་ཕྱིར་རོ། །ཇི་ལྟར་ན་དེ་ལྟར་བསྒྲུབ་པར་བྱ་བ་ཉིད་ཡིན་ཞེ་ན། སྨྲས་པ། དེ་དག་གི་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་དག་ནི་གོ་རིམས་བཞིན་དུ་འབད་པ་མེད་པ་དང༌། འབད་པས་འཐོབ་པའི་སྒོ་ནས་སོ། །ཡང་ན་ལམ་ངང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་དང་ངང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་མ་ཡིན་པ་དག་ཁོ་ན་མོས་པས་གང་ཟག་དང་མི་སྦྱར་གྱི་འབད་པ་མེད་པ་དང་འབད་པས་འཐོབ་པའི་སྒོ་ནས་ཏེ། ལམ་སྔ་མ་འབད་པ་མེད་པར་མངོན་དུ་འགྱུར་བ་དང༌། ཅིག་ཤོས་འབད་པས་འཐོབ་པའི་སྒོ་ནས་ལམ་ངང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་ནི་ མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པས་བསྒྲུབ་པར་བྱ་བ་ཡིན་པའི་ཕྱིར་ལ། ངང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་མ་ཡིན་པ་ནི་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པས་བསྒྲུབ་བར་བྱ་བ་ཡིན་པའི་ཕྱིར་རོ། །དེ་ལྟར་ན་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པར་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བ་སྔ་བར་རུང་ངོ༌། །སྨྲས་པ། གལ་ཏེ་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པས་བསྒྲུབ་པར་བྱ་བ་ཡིན་པའི་ཕྱིར་མངོན་པར་འདུ་བྱེད་པ་མེད་པར་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བའི་ལམ་ངང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་ཡིན་ན། སྐྱེས་ནས་ཡོངས་སུ་མྱ་ངན་ལས་འདའ་བའི་ལམ་ཡང་དང་གིས་འབྱུང་བ་ཡིན་པས་དེ་གཉིས་ལ་ཁྱད་པར་ཅི་ཞིག་ཡོད་ཅེ་ན། དེའི་ཕྱིར་སྨྲས་པ། སྐྱེས་ན
Chinese
被称为“那不是那样”。为什么呢？因为会变得非常过分，即中阴和出生后完全从痛苦中解脱出来的事物，也因为以有为和无为为目标的道路而完全从痛苦中解脱，所以会过分地变成各自具有显现作用和不具有显现作用的完全从痛苦中解脱。因此，会过分地变成只有两种人，而不是五种。被称为“不具有显现作用而完全从痛苦中解脱先出现”，即这个不具有显现作用而完全从痛苦中解脱比具有显现作用而完全从痛苦中解脱先出现。正如那样可行，被称为“详细出现”的是，以不具有显现作用和具有显现作用的人完全从痛苦中解脱，道路自然出现和不自然出现的那些完全从痛苦中解脱，是按照顺序，前者是因为不具有显现作用而需要证实的，后者是因为具有显现作用而需要明显证实的。如果那样需要证实，那么怎样证实呢？回答说，那些完全从痛苦中解脱，是按照顺序，通过不费力气和费力气获得的途径。或者道路自然出现和不自然出现的那些仅仅通过意愿，不与人结合，通过不费力气和费力气获得的途径，即前者道路不费力气地显现，后者通过费力气获得的途径，道路自然出现是因为 不具有显现作用而需要证实，不自然出现是因为具有显现作用而需要证实。那样的话，不具有显现作用而完全从痛苦中解脱先出现是可行的。回答说，如果因为需要通过不具有显现作用来证实，所以不具有显现作用而完全从痛苦中解脱的道路是自然出现的，那么出生后完全从痛苦中解脱的道路也是自然出现的，那么这两者有什么区别呢？因此回答说：出生后
English
That which is called "that is not so." Why is that? Because it would become too extreme, that is, the intermediate state and those who are completely liberated from suffering after birth, also because of the path that aims at the conditioned and the unconditioned, they are completely liberated from suffering, so it would be too extreme to become completely liberated from suffering with and without separate manifestations. Therefore, it would be too extreme to become only two kinds of people, not five. That which is called "completely liberated from suffering without manifestation appears first" means that this completely liberated from suffering without manifestation appears before completely liberated from suffering with manifestation. Just as that is possible, that which is called "appearing in detail" is that people who are completely liberated from suffering with and without manifestation, and those who are completely liberated from suffering by paths that arise naturally and unnaturally, are in order, the former because it needs to be proven without manifestation, and the latter because it needs to be clearly proven with manifestation. If it needs to be proven in that way, then how is it proven? It is said that those who are completely liberated from suffering are, in order, through the means of effortless and effortful attainment. Or, those paths that arise naturally and unnaturally only through intention, without combining with a person, through the means of effortless and effortful attainment, that is, the former path manifests effortlessly, and the latter through the means of effortful attainment, the path arises naturally because it needs to be proven without manifestation, and the unnatural arises because it needs to be proven with manifestation. In that way, it is possible for complete liberation from suffering without manifestation to appear first. It is said that if the path of complete liberation from suffering without manifestation arises naturally because it needs to be proven without manifestation, then the path of complete liberation from suffering after birth also arises naturally, so what is the difference between the two? Therefore, it is said: After birth