Chinese
也是如此。正如因为能辨别种种事物，所以称为“辨别”一样，因为能极为了解，所以称为“智慧”，这样解释也是合乎道理的。世间有房屋的角落坍塌，角落倾斜，这扇门会导致国家被摧毁，这条路会导致国家被摧毁等等，像这样说的时候，对于那些事物，有什么想要表达的作者吗？因此，即使没有想要表达的作者，也说成是作者本身，这样说是很好的。就像说“依靠眼睛和事物，产生眼睛的辨别”这样的结合，是指在一个作者有两种行为时，发生在最先的行为上，你所说的这些是你所希望的吗？或者世间就是这样认为的？回答说：世间就是这样认为的。如果世间是这样认为的，那么世间也有其他的看法，就像这样的结合，也出现在不同的作者身上，例如喝了酥油后产生力量，看到狮子后产生恐惧等等。同样地，星宿生了吗？或者国王所生的那个人的眼睛，依靠那个眼睛，就会产生辨别。在不是最先的时候也能看到，例如张开嘴睡觉，或者闭上眼睛睡觉等等。难道不是张开嘴或者闭上眼睛之后才睡觉的吗？不能这样说。就像先洗澡后吃饭一样，先张开嘴或者闭上眼睛，后来睡觉的这个道理是无法理解的。然而，张开嘴或者闭上眼睛，显然是和睡觉同时发生的。就像这样，张开嘴之后才睡觉，如果嘴不张开，就不会说成张开嘴睡觉了。同样地： 光芒四射者以光芒， 充满世界而出现于彼。 以何者之分而进入， 亦能消除内在之黑暗。 就像这样，这也不是先充满或者进入，然后才出现或者消除。同样地，就像说“冰雹劈啪作响”然后才落下来一样，也不是先说“劈啪作响”然后才
English
It is also like that. Just as because it can distinguish various things, it is called "discrimination," because it can extremely understand, it is called "wisdom," such an explanation is also reasonable. In the world, a corner of a house collapses, a corner tilts, this door will lead to the destruction of the country, this road will lead to the destruction of the country, etc., like this when saying, for those things, is there any author who wants to express? Therefore, even if there is no author who wants to express, it is said to be the author himself, it is good to say so. Just like saying "depending on the eyes and things, the discrimination of the eyes arises," such a combination refers to when one author has two actions, it occurs on the first action, are these what you want? Or is that how the world thinks? Answered: That's how the world thinks. If that's how the world thinks, then the world also has other views, just like this kind of combination, it also appears on different authors, for example, after drinking ghee, strength arises, after seeing a lion, fear arises, and so on. Similarly, was the constellation born? Or the eyes of that person born by the king, relying on those eyes, discrimination will arise. It can also be seen when it is not the first, for example, sleeping with your mouth open, or sleeping with your eyes closed, and so on. Isn't it that you sleep after opening your mouth or closing your eyes? It cannot be said like that. Just like taking a bath before eating, first opening your mouth or closing your eyes, the reason for sleeping later cannot be understood. However, opening your mouth or closing your eyes is obviously happening at the same time as sleeping. Just like this, opening your mouth before sleeping, if you don't open your mouth, you won't say you are sleeping with your mouth open. Similarly: The radiant ones with light, Fill the world and appear there. With what part entering, Also eliminate the inner darkness. Like this, it is also not first filling or entering, and then appearing or eliminating. Similarly, just like saying "hail is crackling" and then falling down, it is also not first saying "crackling" and then
Chinese
也不是坠落，下冰雹的时候叫做声响大，是因为击打的缘故。这样的连结在原因的意义上也看得到，例如依靠木柴而生火，依靠芝麻而生芝麻油，依靠云彩而下雨等等。火不是先前依靠木柴或者芝麻油的芝麻，之后才产生的，雨也不是先前依靠云彩之后才产生的，而是原因本身就像前面所说的那样显现出来。另外，对于那些区分先后次序的事物，在某些情况下，这种连结本身就被视为原因的意义，例如，喝了酥油后变得强壮，就像洗澡和吃饭一样，不应仅仅理解为先后顺序，而应理解为从喝酥油的原因中产生了强壮。同样，在眼睛和色法的因缘下，当眼睛的识产生时，就说依靠眼睛和色法而产生。薄伽梵为了阐明这个道理，这样说道：什么是缘起？即是说，此有故彼生，此生故彼生，例如，无明的缘故产生行等等。因此，应当理解这种连结完全是原因的意义，而不是最早的行为的意义。暂时这个也需要分析，当识产生的时候，识是存在还是不存在？那会怎么样呢？如果存在，那么那个时候它已经是产生的状态了，又怎么会产生呢？存在是产生的状态，而不是存在，如果这样说，那么当它坏灭的时候，就变成是产生的状态了。从词义上来说，存在这个词是指确定抓住已经出生的有情众生，这样说也是矛盾的。如果又说存在但没有产生，那么就变成了在产生之前就存在了。因此，依靠的说法也是成立的。还有，在产生的时候也是没有产生的，在产生之后识
English
It is also not falling; when hail falls, it is called a loud noise because it strikes. Such a connection is also seen in the sense of cause. For example, fire arises from relying on firewood, sesame oil arises from relying on sesame seeds, and rain falls from relying on clouds. Fire does not rely on firewood or sesame seeds of sesame oil beforehand and then arise later, nor does rain rely on clouds beforehand and then arise later. Rather, the cause itself manifests as described above. Furthermore, for those things that distinguish between before and after, in some cases, this connection itself is seen as the meaning of cause. For example, drinking butter becomes strong, just like taking a bath and eating food, it should not be understood merely as a sequence of events, but it should be understood that strength arises from the cause of drinking butter. Similarly, when eye consciousness arises due to the conditions of the eye and form, it is said to arise relying on the eye and form. The Bhagavan, in order to clarify this point, said: What is dependent origination? It is like this: when this exists, that arises; when this is born, that is born. For example, due to ignorance, actions arise, and so on. Therefore, it should be understood that this connection is entirely the meaning of cause, and not the meaning of the earliest action. For the time being, this also needs to be analyzed: when consciousness arises, does consciousness exist or not? What will happen then? If it exists, then at that time it is already in a state of arising, so how can it arise again? Existence is a state of arising, not existence. If you say so, then when it ceases, it becomes a state of arising. From the meaning of the word, the word 'existence' refers to definitely grasping sentient beings who have already been born, so that is also contradictory. If you say that it exists but has not arisen, then it becomes existing before arising. Therefore, the statement 'relying on' is also established. Also, at the time of arising, it is also not arisen; after arising, consciousness