Chinese
因为以无量种类的理智来显示，所以特别殊胜。原因在于，在赞叹超越世间时说：“如果没有证悟无相，您说就没有解脱。因此，您在《大乘经》中，完整地显示了这一点。”因为这样说的缘故。第二部分分二：遣除与《现观庄严论》根本和注释相违，以及遣除与《宝性论》根本和注释相违。第一部分分二：辩论和回答。第一部分是：在此处，认为圣者遍及证悟空性，以及声闻独觉阿罗汉舍弃了实执也不合理，原因在于，因为“为了遣除所取义的证悟”等等，说明了自生阿罗汉没有舍弃执著知识为真实的实执，以及“那是从执著相而缘”等等，说明了声闻独觉阿罗汉被实执束缚的缘故，以及在“烦恼所知道三种”的场合，将实执作为所知障，然后说明了小之又小的那部分被菩萨的广大修道所舍弃的缘故。如果这样说，第二部分是回答：那些过失不会发生，因为在此处可以将那些解释为不了义的缘故。那也是因为，《现观庄严论》中，对于每个所化有情的三种根器，也分别宣说了内部分为上中下三种根器，这是为了摄受小乘种姓的下等根器等缘故。第二部分分二：辩论和回答。第一部分是：认为圣者遍及证悟空性，以及认为实执是烦恼障不合理，原因在于，《宝性论》中，“太阳的轮廓光芒四射，没有眼睛的人无法看见”等等根本和注释中，显示了声闻独觉没有证悟空性，以及“凡是三轮分别，那被认为是所知障”等，说明了实执是所知障的缘故。如果这样说，第二部分是回答：没有过失，第一个原因是：因为是针对被实执束缚的声闻独觉的某些种姓而说的缘故。之所以这样，是因为《宝性论》中说：“自生者的真实义，唯有通过信心才能证悟。”因为说明了自生者证悟了真如的缘故。后者也和之前一样。
English
Because it is particularly excellent as it is shown through limitless kinds of reasoning. The reason is that, in praising transcendence of the world, it is said, "Without realizing the absence of characteristics, you said there is no liberation. Therefore, in the Mahayana, you have completely shown this." Because it is said like that. The second part has two: refuting the contradiction with the root and commentary of the Ornament for Clear Realization, and refuting the contradiction with the root and commentary of the Treatise on the Lineage of the Buddha. The first part has two: debate and answer. The first part is: Here, it is also unreasonable to assume that the noble ones are pervaded by the experience of realizing emptiness, and that the Hearers and Solitary Realizers Arhats have abandoned the clinging to reality, because, "In order to abandon the realization of the object to be grasped," etc., it is explained that the Self-realized Arhats have not abandoned the clinging to reality that clings to knowledge as true, and "That is from the perspective of focusing on characteristics," etc., it is explained that the Hearers and Solitary Realizers Arhats are bound by the clinging to reality, and in the context of "three paths of afflictions and knowable objects," the clinging to reality is made into the obscuration of knowledge, and then it is explained that the smallest of the small is abandoned by the great path of meditation of the Bodhisattvas. If it is said like that, the second part is the answer: Those faults do not occur, because here it is reasonable to interpret those as provisional meanings. That is also because, in the Ornament for Clear Realization, for each of the three types of disciples, it is also explained that the internal divisions are the three types of sharp, medium, and dull faculties, this is for the sake of taking care of some of the lower faculties of the Hinayana lineage, etc. The second part has two: debate and answer. The first part is: It is unreasonable to assume that the noble ones are pervaded by the experience of realizing emptiness, and that the clinging to reality is considered an obscuration of affliction, because, in the Treatise on the Lineage of the Buddha, "The orb of the sun is blazing with light, those without eyes cannot see," etc., the root and commentary show that the Hearers and Solitary Realizers do not have the realization of emptiness, and "Whatever is the conceptualization of the three circles, that is considered the obscuration of knowledge," etc., it is explained that the clinging to reality is the obscuration of knowledge. If it is said like that, the second part is the answer: There is no fault, the first reason is: because it is referring to some of the lineages of Hearers and Solitary Realizers who are bound by the clinging to reality. That is so, because in the Treatise on the Lineage of the Buddha it is said, "The ultimate meaning of the self-born ones, is realized only through faith." Because it is explained that the self-born ones have realized the suchness. The latter is also the same as before.