English
If touched by the three times, past, present, and future, then when should this be killed? It is said that when one thinks, 'I will kill, I am killing, I have killed,' like this, here it is only said of the mind. The teacher shows that some of the monastic tenets are acceptable and some are not. In detail, it is said that just this is not the completion of the path of karma. If someone says, 'Kill my mother!' and instigates it, and the executioner goes, and he thinks, 'Alas! This person has killed my mother.' If obvious pride arises in killing, then even in the case of becoming an unremitting crime, it is not allowed. Therefore, the monk should specifically state that he himself kills. Therefore, it is said in detail that he himself kills. The so-called mind arising in so many cases refers to the thought of killing, is killing, has killed. The so-called nature of reason, some say that touch itself is the nature of reason, just like naming, for its own meaning, it is the cause of nature. For example, just like naming the name itself. Also, understanding reason is the nature of reason, or for this it is the nature of reason, because it has nature, it is the nature of reason. Just like that, the so-called non-obvious, just as it is not easy to understand what is not distinguishable, the difference of complete transformation is also the same as that. The so-called bodily action arising from the cause of the mind refers to the synonym of the bodily action with the mind as the leader. The so-called being different from those refers to being different from the body and mind. The so-called arising from the action done by whom refers to what is done by whom is what is done by whom. Ac