English
He understands the same thing. (b) Or, he who fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, does he fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion? No. He who fully understands the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, does he fully understand the latent tendency of wrong view… (and so on) …the latent tendency of doubt? No. Or, he who fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, does he fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion? He understands the same thing. He who fully understands the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, does he fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence… (and so on) …the latent tendency of ignorance? He understands the same thing. Or, he who fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, does he fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion? No. (Dual Root) 205. He who fully understands the latent tendency of sensual craving and… And the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit understands, does he understand the latent tendency of views… (etc.)… the latent tendency of doubt? No. Or whoever understands the latent tendency of doubt, does he understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit? He understands them as one. Whoever understands the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit, does he understand the latent tendency of desire for existence… (etc.)… the latent tendency of ignorance? No. Or whoever understands the latent tendency of ignorance, does he understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit? He understands the latent tendency of conceit. Whoever understands the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of views, does he understand the latent tendency of doubt? No. Or whoever understands the latent tendency of doubt, does he understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of views? He understands the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit, he understands them as one… (etc.). Whoever understands the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of views and the latent tendency of doubt, does he understand the latent tendency of desire for existence… (etc.)… the latent tendency of ignorance? No. Or whoever understands the latent tendency of ignorance, does he understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of views and the latent tendency of doubt? He understands the latent tendency of conceit. Whoever understands the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of views and the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of desire for existence, does he understand the latent tendency of ignorance? No. Or whoever understands the latent tendency of ignorance, does he understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of views and the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of desire for existence? He understands the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of desire for existence. (The Six Roots) (Kha) Forward sequence 209. (Ka) Where one fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one fully understand the latent tendency of aversion? No. (Kha) Or where one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion, does one fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust? No. (Ka) Where one fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? Yes. (Kha) Or where one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, does one fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust? In the form realm, in the formless realm, there one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, but not there the latent tendency of sensual lust. In the sense realm, in two feelings, there one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, and fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust. Where one fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one fully understand the latent tendency of wrong view… …the latent tendency of doubt? Yes. Or where one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, does one fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust? In painful feeling, in the form realm, in the formless realm, there one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, but not there the latent tendency of sensual lust. In the sense realm, in two feelings, there one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, and fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust. (Ka) Where one fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence? No. (Kha) Or where one fully understands the latent tendency of lust for existence, does one fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust? No. (Ka) Where one fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust, does one fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance? Yes. (Kha) Or where one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, does one fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust? In painful feeling, in the form realm, in the formless realm, there one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, but not there the latent tendency of sensual lust. In the sense realm, in two feelings, there one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, and fully understands the latent tendency of sensual lust. 210. (Ka) Where one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion, does one fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? No. (Kha) Or where one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, does one fully understand the latent tendency of aversion? Is it? No. When one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion, then one fully understands the latent tendency of views... ...the latent tendency of doubt? Yes. Or when one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, then one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion? In the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, then one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, but not then the latent tendency of aversion. In painful feeling, then one fully understands both the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of aversion. (A) When one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion, then one fully understands the latent tendency of craving for existence? No. (B) Or when one fully understands the latent tendency of craving for existence, then one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion? No. (A) When one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion, then one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance? Yes. (B) Or when one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, then one fully understands the latent tendency of aversion? In the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, then one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, but not then the latent tendency of aversion. In painful feeling, then one fully understands both the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of aversion. 211. When one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, then one fully understands the latent tendency of views... ...the latent tendency of doubt? Yes. Or when one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, then one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit? In painful feeling, then one fully understands the latent tendency of doubt, but not then the latent tendency of conceit. In the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, then one fully understands both the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of conceit. (A) When one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, then one fully understands the latent tendency of craving for existence? In the sense-sphere, in two feelings, then one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, but not then the latent tendency of craving for existence. In the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, then one fully understands both the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of craving for existence. (B) Or when one fully understands the latent tendency of craving for existence, then the latent tendency of conceit Is it that one fully understands? Yes. (A) When one fully understands the latent tendency of conceit, then does one fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance? Yes. (B) Or when one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, then does one fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? In painful feeling, then one fully understands the latent tendency of ignorance, but not then the latent tendency of conceit. In the two feelings of the sense-sphere, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, then one fully understands both the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of conceit. 212. (A) When one fully understands the latent tendency of views, then does one fully understand the latent tendency of doubt? Yes.