English
does he, from that, not fully understand the latent tendency of wrong view? ... ...does he not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt? The eighth person, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, from there he does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, but he does not, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. That same person, in the unincluded, from there he does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. Excluding the one endowed with the non-returner's path and the eighth person, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, and do not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. Or again, whoever, from where, does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, does he, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion? The one endowed with the non-returner's path, in painful feeling, from there he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of sensual desire, but he does not, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of aversion. That same person, in the sense-sphere, in the two feelings, from there he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of aversion, but he does not, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire. That same person, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, in the unincluded, from there he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion. Excluding the one endowed with the non-returner's path and the eighth person, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, and do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion. (A) Whoever, from where, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, does he, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence? The one endowed with the highest path, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, from there he does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, but he does not, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence. That same person, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, in the unincluded, from there he does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence. Of the two endowed with the path... Excluding the remaining individuals, everywhere, they do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion, and they do not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence. (B) Or again, whoever, from where, does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence, does that one, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion? One endowed with the non-returner's path, in painful feeling, from there, does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence and the latent tendency of sensual lust, but that one, from there, does fully understand the latent tendency of aversion. That same individual, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, from there, does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence and the latent tendency of aversion, but that one, from there, does fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust. That same individual, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, in the unincluded, from there, does not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence, and does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion. Excluding those endowed with two paths, the remaining individuals, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of lust for existence, and do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion. (A) Whoever, from where, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion, does that one, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance? One endowed with the highest path, in the sense-sphere, in three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, from there, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion, but that one, from there, does fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. That same individual, in the unincluded, from there, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion, and does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. Excluding those endowed with two paths, the remaining individuals, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion, and do not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. (B) Or again, whoever, from where, does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, does that one, from there, not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion? One endowed with the non-returner's path, in painful feeling, from there, does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of sensual lust, but that one, from there, does fully understand the latent tendency of aversion. That same individual... He, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance and the latent tendency of aversion, but he *does* fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire. That same person, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, and unincluded, does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance from that, and the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion does not fully understand. Excluding two path-attainers, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion. 260. Whoever, from wherever, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, does he from that not fully understand the latent tendency of views... ...the latent tendency of doubt? The eighth person, in the sense-sphere, in three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire from that, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, but he *does* fully understand the latent tendency of doubt from that. That same person, in the unincluded, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire from that, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of doubt does not fully understand. Excluding two path-attainers and the eighth person, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of doubt do not fully understand. Or whoever, from wherever, does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, does he from that not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit? A non-returner path-attainer, in painful feeling, does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt from that, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of conceit, but he *does* fully understand the latent tendency of aversion from that. That same person, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt from that, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, but he *does* fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire from that. That same person, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, and unincluded, does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt from that, and the latent tendency of sensual desire... and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit he does not fully understand. One endowed with the highest path, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, from that he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, but from that he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. That very person, when not included in painful feeling, from that he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit. Except for the two endowed with the path and the eighth person, the remaining persons everywhere do not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit. (A) Whoever, from whatever, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, does he from that not fully understand the latent tendency of desire for existence? Yes. (B) Or again, whoever, from whatever,