English
and do not abandon the latent tendency of doubt. Or whoever from wherever does not abandon the latent tendency of doubt from that, does he not abandon the latent tendency of conceit from that? One endowed with the highest path, in the two feelings of the sense-sphere, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, he does not abandon the latent tendency of doubt from that, but he does not not abandon the latent tendency of conceit from that. That same person, in painful feeling, in the not-included states, he does not abandon the latent tendency of doubt from that, and he does not abandon the latent tendency of conceit from that. Excluding the one endowed with the highest path and the eighth person, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not abandon the latent tendency of doubt, and do not abandon the latent tendency of conceit. (A) Whoever does not abandon the latent tendency of conceit from that, does he not abandon the latent tendency of craving for existence from that? Yes. (B) Or whoever from wherever does not abandon the latent tendency of craving for existence from that, does he not abandon the latent tendency of conceit from that? One endowed with the highest path, in the sense-sphere... In the two feelings, he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence from that, but he *does* fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit from that. That very person, in the feeling of suffering, when not included, he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence from that, and he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit from that. Excluding one endowed with the highest path, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence and do not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit. (A) Whoever from where does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit, does he from there not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of ignorance? One endowed with the highest path, in the feeling of suffering, he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit from that, but he *does* fully comprehend the underlying tendency of ignorance from that. That very person, when not included, he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit from that, and he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of ignorance from that. Excluding one endowed with the highest path, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit and do not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of ignorance. (B) Or again, whoever from where does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of ignorance, does he from there not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of conceit? Yes. 256. (A) Whoever from where does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of wrong view, does he from there not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of doubt? Yes. (B) Or again, whoever from where does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of doubt, does he from there not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of wrong view? Yes. ...and so on... 257. (A) Whoever from where does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of doubt, does he from there not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence? One endowed with the highest path, in the form realm, in the formless realm, he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of doubt from that, but he *does* fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence from that. That very person, in the sense realm, in the three feelings, when not included, he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of doubt from that, and he does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence from that. Excluding one endowed with the highest path and the eighth person, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of doubt and do not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence. (B) Or again, whoever from where does not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of craving for existence, does he from there not fully comprehend the underlying tendency of doubt? Does he not fully understand the underlying tendency of craving for existence? The one on the path of Arahantship, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of craving for existence from there, but he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of doubt from there. That same person, in the unconditioned, he does not fully understand both the underlying tendency of craving for existence and the underlying tendency of doubt from there. Excluding the Arahant and the one on the path of Arahantship, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand both the underlying tendency of craving for existence and the underlying tendency of doubt. (A) Whoever from where does not fully understand the underlying tendency of doubt, does he from there not fully understand the underlying tendency of ignorance? The Arahant, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of doubt from there, but he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of ignorance from there. That same person, in the unconditioned, he does not fully understand both the underlying tendency of doubt and the underlying tendency of ignorance from there. Excluding the Arahant and the one on the path of Arahantship, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand both the underlying tendency of doubt and the underlying tendency of ignorance. (B) Or whoever from where does not fully understand the underlying tendency of ignorance, does he from there not fully understand the underlying tendency of doubt? The one on the path of Arahantship, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of ignorance from there, but he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of doubt from there. That same person, in the unconditioned, he does not fully understand both the underlying tendency of ignorance and the underlying tendency of doubt from there. Excluding the Arahant and the one on the path of Arahantship, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand both the underlying tendency of ignorance and the underlying tendency of doubt. 258. (A) Whoever from where does not fully understand the underlying tendency of craving for existence, does he from there not fully understand the underlying tendency of ignorance? The Arahant, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of craving for existence from there, but he does not fully understand the underlying tendency of ignorance from there. That same person, in the unconditioned... Another, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. Except for one endowed with the highest path, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, and do not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. (Kha) Or again, whoever, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, does he, from that, not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence? Yes. (One root) 259. (Ka) Whoever, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, does he, from that, not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? One endowed with the highest path, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, he, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion; but he, from that, does fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. That same person, when not included in painful feeling, he, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, and does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. Except for two persons endowed with the path, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, and do not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. (Kha) Or again, whoever, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, does he, from that, not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion? One endowed with the non-returner's path, in painful feeling, he, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual craving; but he, from that, does fully understand the latent tendency of aversion. That same person, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, he, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of aversion; but he, from that, does fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving. That same person, when not included in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, he, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, and does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion. Except for two persons endowed with the path, the remaining persons, everywhere, do not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, and do not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion. Whoever, from that, does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion,