English
in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of aversion, but from that, he does fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. In the unincluded, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of aversion, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. (Kha) Or if he does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of aversion? Yes. 244. If he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of views... (and so on)... the latent tendency of doubt? In painful feeling, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, but from that, he does fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. In the unincluded, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. Or if he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? Yes. (Ka) If he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence? Yes. (Kha) Or if he does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? In the sense-sphere, in the two feelings, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, but from that, he does fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. In painful feeling, in the unincluded, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. (Ka) If he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance? In painful feeling, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, but from that, he does fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. In the unincluded, from that, he does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, and he does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. (Kha) Or if he does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? Yes. 245. (Ka) If he does not fully understand the latent tendency of views, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt? Yes. (Kha) Or if he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, then from that, does he not fully understand the latent tendency of views? Yes... (and so on)... 246. (Ka) If he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt does not fully understand, therefore does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence? Yes. (Kha) Or, since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, therefore does one not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt? In the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, but one does fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. In the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence and does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt. (Ka) Since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, therefore does one not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance? Yes. (Kha) Or, since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, therefore does one not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt? Yes. 247. (Ka) Since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, therefore does one not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance? In the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence, but one does fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. In the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence and does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance. (Kha) Or, since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, therefore does one not fully understand the latent tendency of craving for existence? Yes. (Single Root) 248. (Ka) Since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, therefore does one not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit? In the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, but one does fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. In the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion and does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit. (Kha) Or, since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit, therefore does one not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion? In painful feeling, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual craving, but one does fully understand the latent tendency of aversion. In the unincluded, one does not fully understand the latent tendency of conceit and does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion. Since one does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion, therefore the latent tendency of wrong view... …latent tendency… does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt? In the form realm, in the formless realm, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. But there, the latent tendency of doubt, he does not fully understand. In the unincluded, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. And the latent tendency of doubt, he does not fully understand. Or again, from where he does not fully understand the latent tendency of doubt, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, does he not fully understand? Yes. (Ka) From where he does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, there, the latent tendency of becoming-desire, does he not fully understand? In the form realm, in the formless realm, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. But there, the latent tendency of becoming-desire, he does not fully understand. In the unincluded, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. And the latent tendency of becoming-desire, he does not fully understand. (Kha) Or again, from where he does not fully understand the latent tendency of becoming-desire, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, does he not fully understand? In painful feeling, there, the latent tendency of becoming-desire and the latent tendency of sensual desire, he does not fully understand. But there, the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. In the sense realm, in two feelings, there, the latent tendency of becoming-desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. But there, the latent tendency of sensual desire, he does not fully understand. In the unincluded, there, the latent tendency of becoming-desire, he does not fully understand. And the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. (Ka) From where he does not fully understand the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, there, the latent tendency of ignorance, does he not fully understand? In the form realm, in the formless realm, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. But there, the latent tendency of ignorance, he does not fully understand. In the unincluded, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, he does not fully understand. And the latent tendency of ignorance, he does not fully understand. (Kha) Or again, from where he does not fully understand the latent tendency of ignorance, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire and the latent tendency of aversion, does he not fully understand? Yes. Since one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of sensual lust, and aversion, and conceit, then one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of views... the underlying tendency of doubt? Yes. Or again, since one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of doubt, then one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of sensual lust, and aversion, and conceit? Yes. (A) Since one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of sensual lust, and aversion, and conceit, then one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of lust for existence? Yes. (B) Or again, since one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of lust for existence, then one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of sensual lust, and aversion, and conceit? In painful feeling, then one does not fully understand the underlying tendency of lust for existence, and sensual lust, and conceit, but not then does one not fully understand the underlying tendency of aversion. In the sense-sphere, in two feelings, then one does not fully understand