English
and the latent tendency of craving for existence also does not lie latent. Or again for whom, where, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of doubt not lie latent? For an ordinary person, in the sense-sphere, in three feelings, for him there, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, but not... And for him there the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. For that very person, in the unincluded, for him there the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, for him there does the latent tendency of ignorance not lie latent? For three persons, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them there the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, but for them there the latent tendency of ignorance does lie latent. For those very persons, in the unincluded, for them there the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. (B) Or again for whom, where the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, for him there does the latent tendency of doubt not lie latent? Yes. 60. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, for him there does the latent tendency of ignorance not lie latent? For four persons, in the sense-sphere, in the three feelings, for them there the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, but for them there the latent tendency of ignorance does lie latent. For those very persons, in the unincluded, for them there the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. (B) Or again for whom, where the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, for him there does the latent tendency of craving for existence not lie latent? Yes. (One root) 61. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, for him there does the latent tendency of conceit not lie latent? For three persons, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them there the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for them there the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For those very persons, in the unincluded, for them there the latent tendency of sensual craving and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. Non-returner For a certain individual, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for him there the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for him there the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For that very same individual, when not connected with unpleasant feeling, for him there the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. (Question) Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, for him there do the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion not lie latent? For three individuals, in unpleasant feeling, for them there the latent tendency of conceit and the latent tendency of sensual lust do not lie latent, but for them there the latent tendency of aversion does lie latent. For those very same individuals, when not connected (with unpleasant feeling), for them there the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent. For whom, where the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, for him there does the latent tendency of wrong view... (and so on)... the latent tendency of doubt not lie latent? For an ordinary person, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for him there the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for him there the latent tendency of doubt does lie latent. For that very same individual, when not connected (with form-sphere and formless-sphere), for him there the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. For two individuals, everywhere... (and so on). Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, for him there do the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion not lie latent? For two individuals, in unpleasant feeling, for them there the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of sensual lust do not lie latent, but for them there the latent tendency of aversion does lie latent. For those very same individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, for them there the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent. and for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie latent. For those very persons, not included in the form realm, the formless realm, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent. For two persons, everywhere...etc. (A) For whom, where, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, for him there, does the latent tendency of craving for existence not lie latent? For three persons, in the form realm, in the formless realm, for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of craving for existence does lie latent. For those very persons, not included, for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent. For the Non-returner, in the form realm, in the formless realm, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for him there, the latent tendency of craving for existence does lie latent. For that very person, in the sense-desire realm, in the three feelings, not included, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere...etc. (B) Or for whom, where, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, for him there, do the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion not lie latent? For three persons, in painful feeling, for them there, the latent tendency of craving for existence and the latent tendency of sensual lust do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of aversion does lie latent. For those very persons, in the sense-desire realm, in two feelings, for them there, the latent tendency of craving for existence and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does lie latent. For those very persons, not included, for them there, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere...etc. (A) For whom, where, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, for him there, does the latent tendency of ignorance not lie latent? For three persons, in the form realm, in the formless realm... In the realm, for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For those very persons, in the unincluded, for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For a non-returner, in the sense-sphere realm, in the three feelings, in the form-sphere realm, in the formless-sphere realm, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for him there, the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For that very person, in the unincluded, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For an Arahant, everywhere... (all latent tendencies do not lie latent). (Kha) Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, for him there, do the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion not lie latent? Yes. (The Root of the Dyad) 62. For whom, where