English
in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, but for him, there, the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For that very individual, in painful feeling and in the unincluded, for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. (B) Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of aversion not lie latent? For three individuals, in painful feeling, for them, there, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, but for them, there, the latent tendency of aversion does lie latent. For those very individuals, in the unincluded, for them, there, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent. For whom, where the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of wrong view... ...the latent tendency of doubt not lie latent? For an ordinary person, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, but for him, there, the latent tendency of doubt does lie latent. For that very individual, in the unincluded, for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. For two individuals, everywhere, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. lies dormant. Or, in whom, where, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant, does the latent tendency of aversion not lie dormant there? For two individuals, in painful feeling, for them, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant there, but for them, the latent tendency of aversion does lie dormant there. For those same individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, in the unincluded, for them, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant there, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant there. For two individuals, everywhere, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant. (Ka) In whom, where, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant, does the latent tendency of craving for existence not lie dormant there? For three individuals, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant there, but for them, the latent tendency of craving for existence does lie dormant there. For those same individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the unincluded, for them, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant there, and the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie dormant there. For an Anāgāmin, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for him, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant there, but for him, the latent tendency of craving for existence does lie dormant there. For that same individual, in the sense-sphere, in three feelings, in the unincluded, for him, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant there, and the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie dormant there. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie dormant. (Kha) Or, in whom, where, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie dormant, does the latent tendency of aversion not lie dormant there? For three individuals, in painful feeling, for them, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie dormant there, but for them, the latent tendency of aversion does lie dormant there. For those same individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the unincluded, for them, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie dormant there, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant there. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant. (Ka) In whom, where, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie dormant, does the latent tendency of ignorance not lie dormant there? For three individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, but for them, there, the latent tendency of ignorance does lie latent. For those same individuals, in the unincluded, for them, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For the Non-returner, in the sense-sphere, in three feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, but for him, there, the latent tendency of ignorance does lie latent. For that same individual, in the unincluded, for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. (B) Or if for whom, where the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent? Yes. 58. For whom, where the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, for him, there, the latent tendency of views... (etc.)... the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent? For the ordinary person, in painful feeling, for him, there, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, but for him, there, the latent tendency of doubt does lie latent. For that same individual, in the unincluded, for him, there, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent. Or if for whom, where the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, for him, there, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent? For three individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them, there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, but for them, there, the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For those same individuals, in painful feeling, in the unincluded, for them, there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, for him, there, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent? Yes. (B) Or if for whom, where the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent For him, there, does the latent tendency of conceit not lie latent? For four individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, for them there, the latent tendency of craving for existence does not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For those very individuals, in painful feeling, and in the unincluded state, for them there, the latent tendency of craving for existence also does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit also does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of craving for existence also does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit also does not lie latent. (Ka) For whom, where, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of ignorance not lie latent? For four individuals, in painful feeling, for them there, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of ignorance does lie latent. For those very individuals, in the unincluded state, for them there, the latent tendency of conceit also does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance also does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of conceit also does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance also does not lie latent. (Kha) Or again for whom, where, the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of conceit not lie latent? Yes. 59. (Ka) For whom, where, the latent tendency of wrong view does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of doubt not lie latent? Yes. (Kha) Or again for whom, where, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of wrong view not lie latent? Yes. For whom, where, the latent tendency of wrong view... the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of craving for existence not lie latent? For three individuals, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of craving for existence does lie latent. For those very individuals, in the sense-sphere, in three feelings, and in the unincluded state, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt also does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of craving for existence also does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of doubt also does not lie latent,