English
and the latent tendency to wrong view, and the latent tendency to doubt do not underlie. In the two feelings of the Sense-sphere, here the latent tendency to craving for existence and the latent tendency to aversion do not underlie, and there the latent tendency to sensual craving, and the latent tendency to conceit, and the latent tendency to wrong view, and the latent tendency to doubt do not underlie. In the unincluded, here the latent tendency to craving for existence and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do not lie latent. (A) Where the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do not lie latent, does the latent tendency of ignorance not lie latent there? Yes. (B) Or where... (etc.) ...? Yes. (Root of Five) 55. (A) Where the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of desire for existence do not lie latent, does the latent tendency of ignorance not lie latent there? Yes. (B) Or where the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, do the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of desire for existence not lie latent there? Yes. (Root of Six) (C) Reverse order of persons and places 56. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent, does the latent tendency of aversion not lie latent for him there? For three persons, in painful feeling, for them, the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent there, but for them, the latent tendency of aversion does lie latent there. For those same persons, in the form realm, in the formless realm, and in the unincluded, for them, the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent there, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent there. For two persons, everywhere, the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent. (B) Or for whom, where the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, does the latent tendency of sensual desire not lie latent for him there? For three persons, in the sense realm, in two feelings, for them, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent there, but for them, the latent tendency of sensual desire does lie latent there. For those same persons, in the form realm, in the formless realm, and in the unincluded, for them, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent there, and the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent there. For two persons, everywhere, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent, does the latent tendency of conceit not lie latent for him there? Does the latent tendency not lie dormant? For three individuals, in the form realm, in the formless realm, for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, but for them there, it is not that the latent tendency of conceit does not lie dormant. For those same individuals, not pertaining to painful feeling, for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie dormant. For a non-returner, in the sense realm, in two feelings, in the form realm, in the formless realm, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, but for him there, it is not that the latent tendency of conceit does not lie dormant. For that same individual, not pertaining to painful feeling, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie dormant. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie dormant. (Kha) Or for whom, or where, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie dormant, for him there, does the latent tendency of sensual lust not lie dormant? Yes. For whom, where, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, for him there, does the latent tendency of wrong view... (etc.)... the latent tendency of doubt not lie dormant? For an ordinary person, in painful feeling, in the form realm, in the formless realm, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, but for him there, it is not that the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant. For that same individual, not pertaining (to painful feeling), for him there, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant. For two individuals, everywhere, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant. Or for whom, or where, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant, for him there, does the latent tendency of sensual lust not lie dormant? For two individuals, in the sense realm, in two feelings, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant, but for them there, it is not that the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant. For those same individuals, not pertaining to painful feeling, in the form realm, in the formless realm, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant. For two individuals, everywhere, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant. (Ka) For whom, where, the latent tendency of sensual lust does not lie dormant... Does the latent tendency to craving for existence not lie latent in him there? For three individuals, in the form realm, in the formless realm, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in them there, but the latent tendency to craving for existence does lie latent in them there. For those same individuals, when not involved with painful feeling, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in them there, and the latent tendency to craving for existence does not lie latent in them there. For a non-returner, in the form realm, in the formless realm, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in him there, but the latent tendency to craving for existence does lie latent in him there. For that same individual, in the sense realm, when not involved with the three feelings, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in him there, and the latent tendency to craving for existence does not lie latent in him there. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent, and the latent tendency to craving for existence does not lie latent. (b) Or again, where the latent tendency to craving for existence does not lie latent in someone, does the latent tendency to sensual craving not lie latent in him there? For three individuals, in the sense realm, with two feelings, the latent tendency to craving for existence does not lie latent in them there, but the latent tendency to sensual craving does lie latent in them there. For those same individuals, when not involved with painful feeling, the latent tendency to craving for existence does not lie latent in them there, and the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in them there. For an Arahant, everywhere, the latent tendency to craving for existence does not lie latent, and the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent. (a) Where the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in someone, does the latent tendency to ignorance not lie latent in him there? For three individuals, with painful feeling, in the form realm, in the formless realm, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in them there, but the latent tendency to ignorance does lie latent in them there. For those same individuals, when not involved, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in them there, and the latent tendency to ignorance does not lie latent in them there. For a non-returner, in the sense realm, with the three feelings, in the form realm, in the formless realm, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in him there, but the latent tendency to ignorance does lie latent in him there. For that same individual, when not involved, the latent tendency to sensual craving does not lie latent in him there, and the latent tendency to ignorance does not lie latent in him there. For an Arahant, s... everywhere the latent tendency of sensual desire does not lie latent and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. (B) Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of sensual desire not lie latent? Yes. 57. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, for him, there, does the latent tendency of conceit not lie latent? For three individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, but for them, there, the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For those very individuals, in the unincluded, for them, there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. For a non-returner, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings,