English
the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit do not lie latent, for him there, does the latent tendency of views... (and so on)... the latent tendency of doubt not lie latent? Yes. Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, for him there, do the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit not lie latent? For two persons, in painful feeling, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of conceit do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of aversion does not lie latent. For those very persons, in the sense-sphere realm, in the two feelings, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of conceit do not lie latent. For those very persons, in the form-sphere realm, in the formless-sphere realm, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt and the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of conceit does not lie latent. For those very persons, in the unincluded, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, (and) the latent tendency of sensual lust and the latent tendency of aversion and the latent tendency of conceit do not lie latent. For a non-returner, in the sense-sphere realm, in the two feelings, in the form-sphere... In the formless realm, for him there, the latent tendency of doubt, of sensual desire, of aversion, do not lie latent. But for him there, the latent tendency of conceit, does lie latent. For that very person, in painful feeling, not included, for him there, the latent tendency of doubt, does not lie latent. And the latent tendency of sensual desire, of aversion, of conceit, do not lie latent. For an Arahant, everywhere... (and so on). (A) In whom, where, the latent tendency of sensual desire, of aversion, of conceit, do not lie latent, for him there, does the latent tendency of desire for existence, not lie latent? Yes. (B) Or in whom, where, the latent tendency of desire for existence, does not lie latent, for him there, do the latent tendency of sensual desire, of aversion, of conceit, not lie latent? For three types of individuals, in painful feeling, for them there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, of sensual desire, of conceit, do not lie latent. But for them there, the latent tendency of aversion, does lie latent. For those very individuals, in the sense-sphere realm, in two feelings, for them there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, of aversion, do not lie latent. But for them there, the latent tendency of sensual desire, of conceit, do lie latent. For those very individuals, not included, for them there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, does not lie latent. And the latent tendency of sensual desire, of aversion, of conceit, do not lie latent. For a Non-returner, in the sense-sphere realm, in two feelings, for him there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, of sensual desire, of aversion, do not lie latent. But for him there, the latent tendency of conceit, does lie latent. For that very person, in painful feeling, not included, for him there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, does not lie latent. And the latent tendency of sensual desire, of aversion, of conceit, do not lie latent. For an Arahant, everywhere... (and so on). (A) In whom, where, the latent tendency of sensual desire, of aversion, of conceit, do not lie latent, for him there, does the latent tendency of ignorance, not lie latent? For a Non-returner, in painful feeling, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual desire, of aversion, of conceit, do not lie latent. But for him there, the latent tendency of ignorance... The latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For that very person, in the unincluded, for him there, the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit do not lie latent, and the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent. For the Arahant, everywhere... (B) Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of ignorance does not lie latent, for him there, do the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit not lie latent? Yes. (Root of the Triad) 63. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views do not lie latent, for him there, does the latent tendency of doubt not lie latent? Yes. (B) Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, for him there, do the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views not lie latent? For two individuals, in painful feeling, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of aversion does lie latent. For those same individuals, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of conceit do lie latent. For those same individuals, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of views do not lie latent, but for them there, the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For those same individuals, in the unincluded, for them there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views do not lie latent. For an Anāgāmin, in the sense-sphere, in two feelings, in the form-sphere, in the formless-sphere, for him there, the latent tendency of doubt, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of views do not lie latent, but for him there, the latent tendency of conceit does lie latent. For that very person, in painful feeling, in the unincluded, for him there, the latent tendency of doubt does not lie latent, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of p And the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views do not lie dormant. For an Arahant, everywhere, and the latent tendency of doubt does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views do not lie dormant. ... (and so on) ... (The Root of Fours) 64. (A) For whom, where the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do not lie dormant, for him, there, does the latent tendency of desire for existence not lie dormant? Yes. (B) Or again, for whom, where the latent tendency of desire for existence does not lie dormant, for him, there, do the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt not lie dormant? For an ordinary person, in painful feeling, for him, there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of conceit do not lie dormant. But for him, there, the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do lie dormant. For that same person, in the two feelings of the sense-sphere, for him, there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, and the latent tendency of aversion do not lie dormant. But for him, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do lie dormant. For that same person, in the unincluded, for him, there, the latent tendency of desire for existence does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do not lie dormant. For two persons, in painful feeling, for them, there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do not lie dormant. But for them, there, the latent tendency of aversion does lie dormant. For those same persons, in the two feelings of the sense-sphere, for them, there, the latent tendency of desire for existence, and the latent tendency of aversion, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do not lie dormant. But for them, there, the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of conceit do lie dormant. For those same persons, in the unincluded, for them, there, the latent tendency of desire for existence does not lie dormant, and the latent tendency of sensual desire, and the latent tendency of aversion... and the latent tendency of conceit, and the latent tendency of views, and the latent tendency of doubt do not lie latent. For the non-returner, in the two feelings of the sense-sphere,