English
at the moment of the arising of a mind dissociated from the path and dissociated from craving, for those who have attained cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of the path does not arise, and the truth of origin does not arise. (C) The reverse case. 34. (A) Where the truth of suffering... Does the truth of the origin not arise there? No. (B) Or where the truth of the origin does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise there? It arises. (A) Where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of the path not arise there? No. (B) Or where the truth of the path does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise there? It arises. 35. (A) Where the truth of the origin does not arise, does the truth of the path not arise there? Yes. (B) Or where the truth of the path does not arise, does the truth of the origin not arise there? In the woeful states, the truth of the path does not arise there, but there the truth of the origin does arise. In the non-percipient beings, the truth of the path does not arise there, and the truth of the origin does not arise there. (C) Cases of contrary individuals and locations. 36. (A) For whom, where the truth of suffering does not arise, for him, does the truth of the origin not arise there? Yes. (B) Or for whom, where the truth of the origin does not arise, for him, does the truth of suffering not arise there? For all those who are arising in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind disjoined from craving, for them, the truth of the origin does not arise there, but for them, the truth of suffering does arise there. For all those who are passing away in the course of existence, at the moment of the dissolution of consciousness, and in the formless realms, at the moment of the arising of the path and the fruit, for them, the truth of the origin does not arise there, and the truth of suffering does not arise there. (A) For whom, where the truth of suffering does not arise, for him, does the truth of the path not arise there? In the formless realms, at the moment of the arising of the path, for them, the truth of suffering does not arise there, but for them, the truth of the path does arise there. For all those who are passing away in the course of existence, at the moment of the dissolution of consciousness, and in the formless realms, at the moment of the arising of the fruit, for them, the truth of suffering does not arise there, and the truth of the path does not arise there. (B) Or for whom, where the truth of the path does not arise, for him, does the truth of suffering not arise there? For all. For those being reborn in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of the mind dissociated from the path, for them there the truth of the path does not arise, but for them there the truth of suffering does arise. For all those passing away, in the course of existence, at the moment of the mind's dissolution, and in the formless realms, at the moment of the fruit's arising, for them there the truth of the path does not arise, and the truth of suffering does not arise. 37. (A) For whom, where, the truth of origin does not arise, for him, there, does the truth of the path not arise? At the moment of the path's arising, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but for them there the truth of the path does arise. For all, at the moment of the mind's dissolution, at the moment of the arising of the mind dissociated from craving and dissociated from the path, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, and the truth of the path does not arise. (B) Or again, for whom, where, the truth of the path does not arise, for him, there, does the truth of origin not arise? At the moment of craving's arising, for them there the truth of the path does not arise, but for them there the truth of origin does arise. For all, at the moment of the mind's dissolution, at the moment of the arising of the mind dissociated from the path and dissociated from craving, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of the path does not arise, and the truth of origin does not arise. (2) Past Section (A) Direct (affirmative) for individuals 38. (A) For whom the truth of suffering arose, for him did the truth of origin arise? Yes. (B) Or again, for whom the truth of origin arose, for him did the truth of suffering arise? Yes. (A) For whom the truth of suffering arose, for him did the truth of the path arise? For those who have not yet comprehended, for them the truth of suffering arose, but for them the truth of the path did not arise. For those who have comprehended, for them the truth of suffering arose, and the truth of the path arose. (B) Or again, for whom... (the truth of the path arose, for him did the truth of suffering arise)? Yes. 39. (A) For whom the truth of origin arose, for him did the truth of the path arise? For those who have not yet comprehended, for them the truth of origin arose, but for them the truth of the path did not arise. For those who have comprehended, for them the truth of origin also arose and the truth of the path also arose. (Kha) Or for whom again... did it arise? Yes. (Kha) Direct Case 40. Where the truth of suffering arose... (Ga) Direct Personal Spatial Cases 41. (Ka) For whom, where the truth of suffering arose, for him, there the truth of origin arose? For the Pure Abodes, when the second thought was occurring, for the non-percipient beings, for them, there the truth of suffering arose, but for them, there the truth of origin did not arise. For the others, those with four aggregates, those with five aggregates, for them, there the truth of suffering also arose and the truth of origin also arose. (Kha) Or for whom again, where... did it arise? Yes. (Ka) For whom, where the truth of suffering arose, for him, there the truth of the path arose? For the Pure Abodes, when the second thought was occurring, for those who have not comprehended, for the non-percipient beings, for them, there the truth of suffering arose, but for them, there the truth of the path did not arise. For those who have comprehended, for them, there the truth of suffering also arose and the truth of the path also arose. (Kha) Or for whom again, where... did it arise? Yes. 42. (Ka) For whom, where the truth of origin arose, for him, there the truth of the path arose? For the Pure Abodes, when the second unwholesome thought was occurring, for those who have not comprehended, for them, there the truth of origin arose, but for them, there the truth of the path did not arise. For those who have comprehended, for them, there the truth of origin also arose and the truth of the path also arose. (Kha) Or for whom again, where... did it arise? Yes. (Gha) Reverse Personal Case 43. (Ka) For whom the truth of suffering did not arise, for him the truth of origin did not arise. did not arise? No. (Kha) Or to whom... did not arise? No. (Ka) To whom the truth of suffering did not arise, to him the truth of the path did not arise? No. (Kha) Or to whom the truth of the path did not arise, to him the truth of suffering did not arise? Yes, it arose. 44. (Ka) To whom the truth of origin did not arise, to him the truth of the path did not arise? No. (Kha) Or to whom... did not arise? Yes, it arose. (Ṅa) The opposite sphere. 45. Where the truth of suffering did not arise... (Ca) The opposite sphere of persons. 46. (Ka) To whom, where the truth of suffering did not arise, to him, there the truth of origin did not arise? Yes. (Kha) Or to whom, where the truth of origin did not arise, to him, there the truth of suffering did not arise? For those in the Pure Abodes, when the second thought was occurring, and for non-percipient beings, for them, there the truth of origin did not arise, but for them, there the truth of suffering did not arise. For those entering the Pure Abodes, for them, there both the truth of origin and the truth of suffering did not arise. (Ka) To whom, where the truth of suffering did not arise, to him, there the truth of the path did not arise? Yes. (Kha) Or to whom, where the truth of the path did not arise, to him, there the truth of suffering did not arise? For those in the Pure Abodes, when the second thought was occurring, for those not yet realized, and for non-percipient beings, for them, there the truth of the path did not arise, but for them, there the truth of suffering did not arise. For those entering the Pure Abodes, for them, there both the truth of the path and the truth of suffering did not arise. 47. (Ka) To whom, where the truth of origin did not arise, to him, there the truth of the path did not arise? Yes. (Kha) Or to whom, where the truth of the path did not arise, to him, there the truth of origin did not arise? For those in the Pure Abodes, when the second unwholesome thought was occurring, for those not yet realized... For those meditators, there the truth of the path did not arise, and for them there the truth of origin did not arise. For the Pure Abode beings, when the second thought moment was occurring, for the non-percipient beings, there the truth of the path did not arise, and the truth of origin did not arise. (3) The Future Section (A) Direct Person 48. (A) For whom the truth of suffering will arise, for them will the truth of origin arise? For Arahants endowed with the highest path, for whom immediately after that thought they will attain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but for them the truth of origin will not arise. For others, for them the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of origin will arise. (B) Or for whom... (etc.)...? Yes. (A) For whom the truth of suffering will arise, for them will the truth of the path arise? For Arahants endowed with the highest path, and for those ordinary people who will not attain the path,