English
(A) Is it not origination, not the truth of origination? Yes. (B) Are they not truths, not the truth of suffering? Yes. Is it not origination, not the truth of origination? Yes. Are they not truths, not the truth of cessation? Are they not truths, not the truth of the path? Yes. 18. Is it not cessation, not the truth of cessation? Yes. Are they not truths, not the truth of suffering? Are they not truths, not the truth of origination? Are they not truths, not the truth of the path? Yes. 19. (A) Is it not the path, not the truth of the path? Yes. (B) Are they not truths, not the truth of suffering? Yes. Is it not the path, not the truth of the path? Yes. Are they not truths, not the truth of origination? Are they not truths, not the truth of cessation? Yes. 3. Section on Pure Truths (A) Direct Order 20. (A) Is suffering a truth? Yes. (B) Are truths the truth of suffering? The truth of suffering is both a truth and the truth of suffering. The remaining truths are not the truth of suffering. Is origination a truth? Yes. ... Is cessation a truth? Yes. ... (A) Is the path a truth? Yes. (Kha) Are truths the truth of the path? The truth of the path is both a truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path. (Kha) The contrary. 21. (Ka) Is it not suffering, not a truth? Excluding suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, they are truths. Excluding suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor a truth. (Kha) Are they not truths, not the truth of suffering? Yes. Is it not origin, not a truth? Excluding origin... Excluding cessation... (Ka) Is it not the path, not a truth? Excluding the path, the remaining truths are not the path, they are truths. Excluding the path and truth, the remainder is neither the path nor a truth. (Kha) Are they not truths, not the truth of the path? Yes. 4. The Pure Truth Root Cycle (Ka) The direct order 22. (Ka) Is suffering a truth? Yes. (Kha) Are truths the truth of origin? The truth of origin is both a truth and the truth of origin. The remaining truths are not the truth of origin. Is suffering a truth? Yes. Are truths the truth of cessation? ... Are truths the truth of the path? The truth of the path is both a truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path. Is origin a truth? Yes. ... Is cessation a truth? Yes. ... Is the path a truth? Yes. Are truths the truth of suffering? ... Are truths the truth of origin? ... Are truths the truth of cessation? The truth of cessation is both a truth and the truth of cessation. The remaining truths are not the truth of cessation. (Kha) The contrary. 23. (Ka) Is it not suffering, not a truth? Excluding suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, they are truths. Excluding suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor a truth. (Kha) Are they not truths, not the truth of origin? Yes. Is it not suffering, not a truth? Excluding suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, they are truths. Excluding suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor a truth. Are they not truths, not the truth of cessation? ... Are they not truths, not the truth of the path? Yes. 24. Is it not origin, not a truth? Origin This, excluding the rest, are truths, not origin, are truths. And excluding origin and truth, the remaining are neither origin nor truths. Are they not truths, not the truth of suffering? ... (and so on) ... 25. Is it not cessation, not truths? Excluding cessation... ... (and so on) ... 26. (A) Is it not the path, not truths? Excluding the path, the remaining are truths, not the path, are truths. And excluding the path and truth, the remaining are neither the path nor truths. (B) Are they not truths, not the truth of suffering? Yes. Is it not the path, not truths? Excluding the path, the remaining are truths, not the path, are truths. And excluding the path and truth, the remaining are neither the path nor truths. Are they not truths, not the truth of origin? Yes. ... (and so on) ... Are they not truths, not the truth of cessation? Yes. Section on the Description of Designations. 2. Section on Occurrence. 1. Section on Arising. (1) Section on the Present. (A) Affirmative Individual. 27. (A) For whom the truth of suffering arises, for them does the truth of origin arise? For all who are arising in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind disjoined from craving, for them the truth of suffering arises, but for them the truth of origin does not arise. At the moment of the arising of craving, for them the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arises. (B) Or for whom the truth of origin arises, for them does the truth of suffering arise? Yes. (A) For whom the truth of suffering arises, for them does the truth of the path arise? For all who are arising in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind disjoined from the path, for them the truth of suffering arises, but for them the truth of the path does not arise. In the five-constituent existence, at the moment of the arising of the path, for them the truth of suffering arises and the truth of the path arises. (B) Or for whom the truth of the path arises, for them does the truth of suffering arise? In the formless realms, at the moment of the arising of the path, for them the truth of the path arises, but for them the truth of suffering does not arise. In the five-constituent existence, at the moment of the arising of the path, for them the truth of the path arises and the truth of suffering arises. and the truth of suffering arises. 28. (a) For whom the truth of origin arises, for him does the truth of the path arise? No. (b) Or for whom the truth of the path arises, for him does the truth of origin arise? No. (b) Affirmative context. 29. (a) Where the truth of suffering arises, there does the truth of origin arise? In the non-percipient beings, there the truth of suffering arises, but not there the truth of origin arises. In the four-constituent realms, in the five-constituent realms, there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arises. (b) Or where... (etc.)... Yes. (a) Where the truth of suffering arises, there does the truth of the path arise? In the lower realms, in the non-percipient beings, there the truth of suffering arises, but not there the truth of the path arises. In the remaining four-constituent realms, in the five-constituent realms, there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of the path arises. (b) Or where the truth of the path arises, there does the truth of suffering arise? Yes. 30. (a) Where the truth of origin arises, there does the truth of the path arise? In the lower realms, there the truth of origin arises, but not there the truth of the path arises. In the remaining four-constituent realms, in the five-constituent realms, there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of the path arises. (b) Or where... (etc.)... Yes. (c) Affirmative personal and spatial contexts. 31. For whom, where the truth of suffering arises, for him, there does the truth of origin arise? ... (etc.). (This should be elaborated similarly for "for whom" and "for whom where"). (d) Negative personal context. 32. (a) For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, for him does the truth of origin not arise? Yes. (b) Or for whom the truth of origin does not arise, for him does the truth of suffering not arise? For all who are arising, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind dissociated from craving, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but for them the truth of suffering does arise. For all who are passing away, in the course of existence... At the moment of the mind's dissolution, in the formless realms, and at the moment of the arising of path and fruition, for them, the truth of origin does not arise, and the truth of suffering does not arise. (A) For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, for them does the truth of the path not arise? At the moment of the arising of the path in the formless realms, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but for them the truth of the path does arise. For all those passing away, at the moment of the mind's dissolution in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of fruition in the formless realms, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, and the truth of the path does not arise. (B) Or for whom the truth of the path does not arise, for them does the truth of suffering not arise? For all those being reborn, at the moment of the arising of a mind dissociated from the path in the course of existence, for them the truth of the path does not arise, but for them the truth of suffering does arise. For all those passing away, at the moment of the mind's dissolution in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of fruition in the formless realms, for them the truth of the path does not arise, and the truth of suffering does not arise. 33. (A) For whom the truth of origin does not arise, for them does the truth of the path not arise? At the moment of the arising of the path, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but for them the truth of the path does arise. For all at the moment of the mind's dissolution, at the moment of the arising of a mind dissociated from craving and dissociated from the path, for those who have attained cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of origin does not arise, and the truth of the path does not arise. (B) Or for whom the truth of the path does not arise, for them does the truth of origin not arise? At the moment of the arising of craving, for them the truth of the path does not arise, but for them the truth of origin does arise. For all at the moment of the mind's dissolution,