English
^Rr^f^trwRRapqR, 11 arom^r sT’g-Tq? | nmri ;?>raf: Jftr?rrcrf%?ap!?: i f?rf) qrgqr stqsjjq: wi % axh - fl^r snhr sit ft^qrqRfRNfl - ?ifverq. it Verse 2. Padapatha : jq^Wrrpr i lip | I *3hr! ?fpt ! atf^Frr 1 f^cir! 1 I 3rf%*r 1 sriffar^ I ff- m l i wp.#r ffcf i srr#rre;l ?•• n % Sayana * ir yrrg<Tromwi sqrrn^nrHWfrfRsfa l ftppf frjrsr?ftrr ?rt zrsprprra w^r f?'<rr i wftfwft fw?r su^rfrii rarq. i arRrrr^ i i I *pfarf' Cf*i ^ 11 ’TgHSffr atfi- nfkgjfcftfr ^ srrefrrr tism u Notes In line 8 of the commentary “ tadabhavavad daridryam V is from my MS. M. M, << tadannadaridryam ! , ,, Verse 3. Padapatha 3?r I ?r^ l I | tw#f I p , S|?l f- w- 1 S fv*brnfr*?raj I I srr! I 1 Ii %. Sayana t sr^Hwr'fr^Rrmr 3^1%^rr 3?# r*finra*: *rr*r- ^ifr^r fsrnr ^afrr 3j?r*rr I ^r*r*rf&r ?wcrrr% sTQH'ff irf*i'T 3 f tP w | sif^sfr stPsftT 3 t<Tjr ? .T?'?=K 3 [^r<% 5 ’^sri- c^r*t*rra.ll Verse 4- Padapatha ; m 1 ^ 1 I p# fRf pTcft i srifcr I fr- sfr 1 ffSf^R-; i wi^m \! ?srs?rkr 1 srr I ?:! q^rr I <SL trwjm I zk \ S qrr I arrfflfl^c^.i r^urrlr li v Sayana : % *jqtfr qnaranrm 'rr^mP^fr^f jrf^fr: **fr ?rso?r i^#rr?Cr- •sflft ^t?r srftrWr I i fvrsgpci Wf58ir^ wr ssraw sr* fifsrf% i s^r i <prr ^rjfrl’rraRsr- pMjt ffl'-s^mTrqfr^m’i i srstfr #r r^Nr s^ffs'frsPifsmrfft str^str I aw^r? i *n%&> *rr nmrm rtr m 3-qrramll Notes : 1. Usrdyama. This word occurs in only one other passage, iv, 32, 24, <( ararn ma usrayamne ’ram dnusrayamne babhru yatneshv asridha.” Sayana, he indra asridha asridbau ahinsakau habhru babhruvarnau tvadiyavasvau yameshu gamanesbu prapteshu satsu usrayamne usrabhyam anucjdbhyam yuktena rathena yatity usrayama tasmai me mahyam aram alum pHryaptakarinau fohavatam amisra- yarnne padbhyam eva gachchbate mahyam a ram pary aptakarinau bhavatam.” In both passages Roth takes it to mean ‘coming in the morning.’ ■ 2. Visvapsnyah. The meaning of this rare word is not certain. On vii, 42, 6, ** ray&skamo visvapsnyasya staut/ 1 Sayana’s note is a agnim devam visvapsnyasya pururiipasya dhanasya labhaya staut.” On viii, 97, 15 he has the following note with regard to 'visvapsnyasya:’--“ psa iti rupanama rupe sadhu psyam nakaropa-janas chhandasali bahurupam.” 3. In line 1 of the commentary Muller inserts ‘yo’ before ‘ratho’ by conjecture. It is not in my MS., and it does not appear to me to be wanted. In line 4 my MS. has 4 tad ratho,’ the reading of M. M.’s A. Bl. In line 5 ‘athavaha’ is difficult. M. M, suggests that we should read ‘anya aha/ as Sayana has on vi, 42, 2, and this seems very probable. In the same line Miiller reads ‘vam’ for ‘va* against all NOTES. NOTES. 245 the MSS., and wrongly. He has mistaken the meaning of the note. The alternative explanation of the verse which Say ana is referring to does not altogether reject the previous explanation of the word ‘visvapsnyah’ in the text. But it seeks to add “vasishtho va.” It goes on to say that < jigati’ means ‘stauti’ (and not *gachchhati\) Terse 5, Pajdapatha ; ^1 ^TWT^l^r: | R I 1 $- I 1 fatl S^Tt I crw- I I 3Tf%W| faI I tWt J 1 ^rtfa' II ^ SayanA : % srpq;rr xr=rr ®wi*r i 57 777x3- qfw &*** i wijwtpwnnw ^ wjL ^rsrirrPTJm s 3 fi?r I 3 ^ ^ 7 ft srrei m*iw: i 3 tTfr 3 Vaftcrnft: ^RrenrfW-nst pw- ^7SP? I .JTfgfre'gH 37777 aliTFTTT f3'SJI , ?r3 1373: 137T *Tff 1 7 KilT-t Rrfirw yjOk ?7 ; it37. 1*nf3 fapw r- fafff ^tFT? II Note s In 1. 3 of the commentary my MS. reads ‘niruhnthah,’ as all M. M.’s do. In 1. 4 M. M. corrects the ‘niparayatam’ of the MSS. to ‘nya- paravatam,’ This does not seem necessary. Sayana wants simply to tell the student that the word in the text must be taken in a causal sense. He does not trouble himself about the omitted augment. Verse 6. pAOAPATHA : l^ri wfr'rr If^l I l s f%? l NOTES. fS sgprFT I fwr S ir^rr^r! Rpr \ mm* i ^5*r! m§ I ^Trecf5j% ; j m \\ ^ Sayana: % sTmrr^Tfa^ T%>5rr rgRftTjff.- frfrt tr: i rff*jwf Sf 5 ^- ■wtfr ifn ?3M: farr i I fsr°rr aFrrTRr gff% tm’r *pr ir'-rr ’^nrarrgi ?Tr *grft mrPc #$(§ g?r®pr ffr ^rwrtTrrr ^aar^ i ra^gjl Note : This verse is a repetition of vii, 707 * I have given the commen¬ tary to be found there* Say ana's note here is u iyam marmheti fjhashthi gata.” No. 21 . Mandala VII. Sukta 77 , SayanA ; OTf fRr *ro*r *t% I r s'rfas't I JTreTTg'Tr^rrf’^T^ef^fr^ NfftCnr; II Verse 1. PadAPATHA : <rfr ifti I ! fffcTt I *r l mm I * I ^TR I 3 T^r I ^rrlr: I &S0 j jnfTFTRj ^ I -Rffer: I ^Tw^rr 1 rnrff%li 1 Sayana : f^g^r 3% *rfbr f-T *ffa?er i jjto ?r i *rr *wr ^rwrr^rr 7**0 ?hh i t ft-* w^rrrat sre^'r frraKtfti i%^rffT*Trfsrr cr rr Ngs^r- NOTES. 247 "irmfa hwIjw i fr*n$ %? i serpr^s tr ?mt^r- ^^TrcFwrT’Tm ^rwff sT 5rr*r4r stsrt^W i ®r*r^r slfTO sanffisewrfir snwrr srMwsrri^ srap: ar^r^ll Notes : 1. Abbud agnih satmdhe manushanam. This clause is paren¬ thetical. Men must light the fire on the altar to greet the coming Dawn. 2. Badhamana. Neither of Sayana’s explanations can be accepted. It is the Dawn that has made a light, and is driving away the darkness. Compare No, 18, verse 5, In line 5 of the commentary the MSS., including my Bhao Daji and Kohlapore MSS., read‘ f badhamfinam va.'* Muller rejects the *va/ It would perhaps be better to reject both words. If Sayana explain¬ ed the 'badhamana’ of the text by ‘ badhamanafn^ he need not have added ‘bailhakam/ The IDlph. Coll. MS. has the following note hero, “andhakarau badhamana badhamanam jyotih tejahsangham akarshlu” Verse 2* Paoapatba ? I 3T?fr^'r i wsjp-rr: | I I w4t I rwwcfr I rff^sfori I I HfOT I f | 3$f/w 1 ^fff% 11 ^ ~ " #' ~~ ~ Sayana: >- gw: g#?r: SfaTr l urnr ^ ^5Tfrt *p* wr w#rt %sr:pjjr ftNOTtasKrw I nffafrt&z | gg3£ Ssri if ftStet *rf? gw ?rr i *prr%* jr *rnrr Rffljhfr 1% <rf lw^m<?w i *rg> fMr^Nr t 5Ttnn I ^wr Pmr^r l f^wnf irf'rfgsft h . nmstQr <s NOTES* Verse 3* Padapatha ; ^TFrrrr I ^ i I ^cfr * 1 H~cft I f s l#FT^I ||§^!ilp I 1 f%53T=rFr S r%Wwr! fr4*U H I srs^rr u ^ Sayana : *m2rRft gwr wr>m?nr IfjfwM *H t > f%3 I ar^r^rs^ i i itstk: fsirfc ’n i f^mr ffpsrwr RW:$ r'f srT?3^ ^r *rf:gr *T*r^araffr- tra?qf: H Verse 4. PAD.APATHA : i fr I te? i flfrr i jt®£P*U I I ? : I vH! %4*. I ®rr I ?j I I I H | *£# I t%I% II v Sayana j % 3<sr:3#iTWRT 3T^'r?r%% *rr*i vya anF*rr: srrfafrsrmr i ?*• rrpT^m^si’i jjr-sw# nrsnfetsr f?anr sa®^ f%*m| i ^nrri mr r <mr sa'gr??t!5r: i aar n^tft gPmi frrsprntr frfa ^ ! f% %^*rs|TPrar 3re*ra: m ’f r?*r Ww I |w*r >mfa ii Note: In line 2 of the commentary all the MSS. maVe Sayana substitute * vyuehchha ’ for the * uchchha ’ of the text of the hymn. In line 4 Muller adds <l vasuni aatrunarp. dhananya bhara ahara, ” from one of his MSS. only. It is not in either of mine, and is pro¬ bably an interpolation. Compare the next note. MINfSty In ft ire 3 of the commentary Muller adds “ rathavad rathair upetam ” after “ asvavad nsvais chopetatn ” from two of his MSS. only. Jt is not in either of mine, 3nd is clearly an interpolation. For if Saynna had written the clause he must have written “ rathais <ila ” t0 correspond with the “ asvaischa ” of the previous clause. Verse 5. Pa a path a: mn ffrr I Srtfr: i I r% l ^rf| j a#* \ frf { | Wi I 3Jff3r; j pfor | W | sp | J 1 %srf?r | j I || | Sayana s **&*&*% *m. ira&Tfofsr: srsfirm^r i f% f*r?fr l ffrw^r^-frritr^ I $ f^r't ft4- tft ^ <rvjr W i wft f^prr€?r% II Verse 6 Fadapatha J ^ i W i iff- i $ffwj i f1 t4: i j 5 | T% s jR' 5 S 3W3Tt | m | ! fn I j i fN’U 1 TJf I €fT%^ ; j ^ I f: II ^ SAYANA; f ffff irffTFST- g*mf m m ??rr firer^ f?r'rw%?r- w* m *rravsr ^ ^ ^ Wf . ^ ,j. No. 22. MatoAtA VII. JStiKTA 86 . SaYana : '•f'rfr ^Sparest qrsrtf w-vft Ir-d ^of^qtr i ^pr^r ■ I >iWr I *rcfr MU ii " m Verso 1. PadapathA: vfrtf 11| mn i frfir^T l srfr?I f%l m I I %<bf #r I $$$ f^r I a I i mwj I ff-cr^if|rfr I f I £*r II \ .Bayana: m*t 3r#r w?*rrftr *ir?5Tr *rr|*rr ? few tffcr >#fTr% i vj: <vs°r<'Wr fttNnft f% trw**r ftrf-4 wr4 f*r% i *r*r *?p?t *r*r*rfW iwr4 ^ trc# *?NN fear hi rfft ^rtr% w i s^ftr *$#W smfo tr#r *rcnr ?r4fa RrsrtTKi i w*r ^ % *r< Presr- fom?, <11 Notes: 1, DMra fcviteya, <&c. It is a question whether fi asya s goeB with * janunshi’ as Sayana takes it, or with the nearer *mahina/ The latter construction seems preferable, 1 The peoples endure by the might of him~ who/ &o. But Max Muller, Roth and Grassmann all join f( asya jannrishi, h and translate ‘his worka/ Ludwig construes as I do, but he makes ‘dhira* mean wise, 2, Vi yas tastarnbha rdclasl chid urvt. < Who stemmed asunder the' wide firmaments/ Max Muller. Heaven and Earth, referred to individually in the line which follows. 3, Pra..„nunude. ‘Lifted on high/ Mas Muller* * Bet in. mo¬ tion/. Grassmann and Ludwig. Perhaps ‘beat out’ as a goldsmith beats out a piece of metal. 4, Doha. This seems to mean ‘and also’here. 1 Apart/Mas Muller. Roth m akes the word a particle of asseveration ( zzQr. #ijra.) Grassmann connects the two meanings. “A particle of emphasis, in some such sense as that in which we repeat a statement to denote that it is absolutely certain/’ 5, F&pr&thach oha bhiima. This is, as Sayana take it, a clause by itself, as the accent of the verb shows. NOTES. 251 Verse 2. Padapatha 3W I wA I I m.) f? I cfrT } I 5 i 3prT- I wi°t \ wf rff i l *r! I i l. i f srf^i l atfn ! 1! H Sayana .': 3F°r #sr firfggpT ssfacfrar facr-ifo# i srtr?r rff^rarmr^rw i s?r f% gfar ^r>WFft%5T ^kitt sf ^ g^wf 5ifrf*T i swrerg: *R“h g? *fa% i ^r g 5K?r ^ ^nc 5 r gRrgjfl“ g’-rrK I f%% #rar wft?*rah i ®rft n % •#* ?* 5r# sfNt'ars- "TR: ST^MReR-T: %%sr %tg I @Rr- W*RgHWf Wf ? ' mr grf^Fgr?* grafts? mHPrr^tm. u IYotes : 1. Uta sv&ya tanva> sam vade tat. 4 And I muse thus with my self.