Chinese
རོ། ། 不灌顶就无法以虚空开启来介绍禅修，因为没有词灌顶。因为没有获得表诠的词灌顶，所以无法介绍法性，经由教证成立。此处即使未从波罗蜜多中宣说，也必须灌顶，因为与方便密咒相关。在虚空开启的介绍时，是介绍不勤作无改造的法性呢？还是介绍勤作改造的法性？如果如第一种情况，所介绍的法性，虽然认为是不勤作，但会变成勤作。因为在介绍的时候，身体竖立嘎色，双手合掌于头顶，口中发出啪字。如果承认，则不勤作无改造的介绍的誓言破灭。因为是对勤作进行介绍。如果对不勤作进行介绍，则不需要身体竖立嘎色，双手合掌于头顶。如果说，观想的要点是将心性覆盖在身体上而安住，那么，心是收摄于心间还是不收摄？如果收摄，则心性法，会变成有事物。因为有收摄之物。例如服用汤药，将疾病收摄于脉轮中一样。如果承认，则会变成有事物。如果说无事物也需要收摄，则周遍不成，因为无事物不需要收摄，因为没有收摄之物。例如收摄于虚空中，但仍然安住于无事物中一样。无论明觉安住于何处，安住于彼处即可，因为安住于空性中。心性是从头顶射出而与虚空混合，是这样认为还是不这样认为？如果这样认为，则心性法，会变成实物。因为有从头顶射出之物。如果承认，则不会变成实物。因为安住于空性中。如果没有射出之物，则射出的誓言破灭。因为没有射出之物。如果承认，则心性法会变成有事物。因为有混合之物。无事物没有混合之物，如同虚空与虚空没有混合之物一样。混合后是混合还是不混合？如果混合，虽然认为混合，但会变成不混合。因为心有乐分和空分两种，而虚空只有空分，没有乐分。如果不混合，则混合变得无意义。因为即使混合也不混合。不认为与虚空混合
English
ro. ། If you don't empower, you can't introduce meditation with opening the sky, because you don't have the word empowerment. Because you have not obtained the word empowerment of the sign, it is impossible to introduce the nature of reality, which is established by scripture. Here, even if it is not explained from the Paramita, empowerment is necessary, because it is related to the secret mantra of means. At the time of the introduction of opening the sky, is the nature of reality introduced without effort and without modification? Or is a modified nature of reality introduced with effort? According to the first case, the introduction is the subject. Although it is considered effortless, it becomes effortful. Because at the time of introduction, the body stands up in Kakse, the palms are joined on the crown of the head, and the word Phat is uttered in the mouth. If you agree, then the vow of introducing without effort and without modification is broken. Because it is an introduction to effort. If you introduce it without effort, then you don't need to stand up in Kakse and put your palms on the crown of your head. If the point of focus is to cover the mind itself on the body and stay there, then does the mind gather in the heart or not? If it is gathered, then the nature of mind is the subject. It becomes an object. Because there is something to gather. For example, just as taking Tang medicine gathers the disease in the pulse wheel. If you agree, then it becomes an object. If you say that you need to gather without objects, then the pervasiveness is not established, because non-objects do not need to be gathered, because there is nothing to gather. For example, even if it is gathered in the sky, it still stays without objects. No matter where the awareness stays, it is enough to stay there, because it stays in emptiness. Do you want to throw the mind itself from the crown of the head and mix it with the sky, or not? If you think so, then the nature of mind is the subject. It becomes an object. Because there is something to throw from the crown of the head. If you agree, then it will not become an object. Because it stays in emptiness. If there is nothing to throw, then the vow to throw is broken. Because there is nothing to throw. If you agree, then the nature of mind becomes an object. Because there is something to mix. There is nothing to mix with non-objects, just as there is nothing to mix with the sky. After mixing, is it mixed or not? If it is mixed, although it is considered mixed, it becomes unmixed. Because the mind has two parts, happiness and emptiness, but the sky only has emptiness and no happiness. If it is not mixed, then mixing becomes meaningless. Because even if it is mixed, it is not mixed. I don't think it mixes with the sky.