Back to the library

kgs003 0009.direct perception.sanskrit.pratyaksa.valid cognition discussion.g2.0f

Page 25 of 25

Chinese

我,有两种理证。第一种是,论师世亲在遮破声闻部认为极微是根识的对境时说,否则有色根也应该是显现蓝色和二月等现象的识的因,这与他的说法相违。第二种有以开头相同的理证遮破和以太过分的方式遮破两种。第一种是,‘所依根若是何’等句所阐述的。第二种有四种过失:成为不随顺俱有缘根损坏而生灭;成为言说依赖声音而生;成为执持自境依赖符号;成为自境不明显显现。这四种过失应当在论典本身中进行思考。似现量已经讲述完毕。 现量正量讲述完毕。

English

I, there are two types of reasoning. The first is that, when Master Vasubandhu refutes the Śrāvakās' view that atoms are the objects of sense consciousness, he says that otherwise, colored sense organs should also be the cause of consciousness that manifests blue and the double moon, etc., which contradicts his statement. The second has two types: refutation by reasoning with the same beginning and refutation by being too extreme. The first is explained by the phrase 'Whatever the dependent sense is, if it is what'. The second has four faults: becoming not following the arising and ceasing of the co-operative condition of the damaged sense organ; becoming speech relying on sound to arise; becoming grasping its own object relying on symbols; becoming its own object not appearing clearly. These four faults should be contemplated in the text itself. The seeming perception has been explained. Explanation of direct perception as valid cognition is complete.

Page 25 of 25