Chinese
问：如果不存在通过力量来理解，那么与论师所说的通过力量来理解或通过意义来理解经文的某些部分相矛盾。答：没有过失。这是指通过习惯于现量的作用或三种方式而突然产生的比量。如《释量论》中所说：所有不是自己成立的事物，因为与自身相关联，所以能成立，不欺骗，依靠他者。不是现量的量，不是比量之外的其他。如是说。不欺骗，不了解，意义清晰，意义相反。体相，现量和比量二者不欺骗。从自和他二者中确定和了解，从自身确定的作用进行遮破和成立。这被称为总结的偈颂。总的量的定义已经很好地解释完毕。 对比量的定义进行确定的量进行解释。
English
Question: If there is no understanding through force, then it contradicts what the teacher said about understanding certain parts of the scriptures through force or understanding through meaning. Answer: There is no fault. This refers to the sudden arising of inference from being accustomed to the function of perception or the three modes. As it is said in the Pramāṇavārttika: All things that are not established by themselves, because they are related to themselves, can establish, are not deceptive, and rely on others. A valid cognition that is not perception is not other than inference. Thus it is said. Non-deceptive, not understanding, meaning clear, meaning opposite. Characteristics, both perception and inference are non-deceptive. From both self and other, certainty and knowledge arise, and from the function determined by oneself, refutation and establishment are performed. This is called the concluding verse. The definition of the general valid cognition has been well explained. Explanation of the valid cognition that ascertains the definition of inference.