Chinese
རྒྱན། 驳斥了顺世外道和婆罗门的观点，论证了二者意义相反相成；具备该特征的量，如何断除增益；对于数量确定的意义，能诠释的种种分类；对于所立宗，破除两种错觉；对于自知和他知的意义，使所立宗对特征确定之量；共同地，它如何进行破立之方式等，都已阐述。第九品阐述了经部和《释量论》决定的现量品中所说的正确现量、相似现量、量和果，并顺带阐述了比量的量和果。此处首先阐述了现量总体的特征，然后分别阐述了各自的分类，这似乎与《定量论》的顺序一致，将在下文阐述。在此瑜伽现量的章节中，似乎将《量成立品》中所说的量士夫的论证方式，结合到瑜伽现量的论证中进行阐述，真是令人惊叹的说法。第十品阐述了经部、《释量论》决定、《理滴论》和《因滴论》中所说的正确因和相似因的分类，以及《为他义品》和《理门论》中所说的所立宗的分类。第十一品阐述了《论理》中所说的辩论场合的人的种种分类、二十二种责难、经部中所说的十四种堕处、理门论中所说的十种堕处，以及三部论典的《为他义品》中所说的立论和破立的种种分类。二十四种堕处是二十二种责难的最后两种，像这样的责难的数量确定是外道顺世论者的观点，因此予以驳斥，并如《论理》中所说，论证了从二分出的四种数量确定。将陈那法称的一切论典的所诠释义汇集在一起进行如此阐述，是因为没有其他人解释它们的意图，因此遵循此宗派应被认为是幸运的。
English
Here, it refutes the tenets of the Lokayata and Brahmanas, and proves that the two are opposite yet complementary in meaning. It also explains how a valid cognition that possesses that characteristic cuts off superimpositions, the various divisions of what is to be expressed in relation to the meaning of numerical certainty, the refutation of two kinds of wrong conceptions regarding the subject, the valid cognition that ascertains the characteristic in relation to the subject for the meaning of self-awareness and other-awareness, and how it commonly performs refutation and establishment. The ninth chapter explains the correct perception, the seeming perception, and the valid cognition and its result, as stated in the chapter on perception in the Sutra and the commentary on valid cognition, and also incidentally explains the valid cognition and its result of inference. Here, it seems that the general characteristic of perception is first explained, and then the divisions are explained separately, which seems to be in accordance with the order of the Compendium on Valid Cognition, which will be explained below. In the section on yogic perception, it seems that the reasoning for establishing a valid person, which is stated in the chapter on the establishment of valid cognition, is applied to the establishment of yogic perception, which is a wonderful explanation. The tenth chapter explains the correct reason and the seeming reason as stated in the Sutra, the Compendium on Valid Cognition, the Drop of Reasoning, and the Drop of Logic, and the divisions of what is to be established as stated in the chapter on the Benefit of Others and the Gate of Reasoning. The eleventh chapter explains the various divisions of persons in the context of debate as stated in the Treatise on Debate, the twenty-two refutations, the fourteen lapses stated in the Sutra, the ten lapses stated in the Examination of Reasoning, and the various divisions of establishment and refutation stated in the chapter on the Benefit of Others in all three treatises. The twenty-four lapses are the last two of the twenty-two refutations, and the numerical certainty of such refutations is the view of the externalist Lokayatas, so it is refuted, and as stated in the Treatise on Debate, it is proven that the four are divided from the two. To gather together all the meanings of the treatises of Dignaga and Dharmakirti and explain them in this way is because no one else explains their intention, so following this system should be considered fortunate.