Chinese
认为没有自性，就像做梦一样。在《八千颂》中说，如果有人，无论男女，在梦中做了善或不善的行为，那么这个行为是积累还是接近积累呢？等等，这是以自己的体性积累。接近积累是指具有产生果实的能力。第一个回答是： 具寿善现说：世尊如何宣说一切法如梦，这样的话，从中不会有积累或减少。为什么呢？因为梦中的法，无论积累或减少，都不可得。然而，醒来后进行分别，那么就会有积累或减少。意思是说，因为一切法都像梦一样被说成是不真实的。因此，他们认为在胜义谛中没有增减。如果像梦一样没有自性，那么它的法就没有增减。在世俗谛中，例子不成立，因为在梦中做了行为，醒来后感到高兴，就会有增减。因此，为什么在世俗谛中，周遍也不成立。这些说明了业和它的果报之间的关系，仅仅是在世俗谛中由约定俗成而产生的。在《摧魔》和《断障》中，都说“然而醒来后”等等，虽然说是舍利子问善现，但在《日光》和《八十颂》中，都说是善现说的，在《八千颂》中也是这样说的。第二个诘难是： 善现说：白天杀生和在梦中杀生，如果醒来后这样想：我杀了，我杀得好啊。具寿舍利子，你对此怎么说？意思是说，在《日光》中说：“你对此怎么说”是指完全询问了真实和不真实的自性，虽然对治是相违的，但由于分别念会随之而来，因此以在胜义谛中真实显示的意义来这样辩论。意思是说，因为之前用后得智滋养，显示了梦中的行为有增减，所以接着说白天杀生是真实的业。
English
Thinking that there is no inherent existence, like a dream. In the Eight Thousand Verse Prajnaparamita, it says, if someone, male or female, performs a virtuous or non-virtuous action in a dream, does that action accumulate or nearly accumulate? Etc., this is accumulating with one's own nature. Nearly accumulating means having the ability to produce fruit. The first answer is: The venerable Subhuti said: Shariputra, how did the Blessed One say that all phenomena are like dreams? In that case, there would be no accumulation or decrease from it. Why is that? Because in a dream, no phenomena, whether accumulating or decreasing, can be found. However, if one discriminates after waking up, then there will be accumulation or decrease. It means that because all phenomena are said to be unreal like dreams. Therefore, they believe that there is no increase or decrease in ultimate truth. If it is without inherent existence like a dream, then there is no increase or decrease in its phenomena. In conventional truth, the example is not established, because if one performs an action in a dream and feels happy after waking up, there will be increase or decrease. Therefore, why is the pervasion also not established in conventional truth. These show that the relationship between actions and their results is merely arising from convention in conventional truth. In both the Destroyer of Harm and the Cutter of Obstacles, it says "However, after waking up," etc. Although it is said that Shariputra asked Subhuti, in the Sunlight and Eighty Verses, it is said that Subhuti said it, and it also appears that he said it in the Eight Thousand Verse Prajnaparamita. The second objection is: Subhuti said: Killing during the day and killing in a dream, if one wakes up and thinks like this: I killed, I killed well. Venerable Shariputra, what do you say about that? It means that in the Sunlight it says: "What do you say about that action" means that the nature of truth and untruth is completely inquired, although the antidote is contradictory, but because discrimination will follow, therefore it is argued in this way with the meaning of truly showing it in the ultimate truth. It means that because it was previously nourished by subsequent wisdom, showing that there is increase or decrease in dream actions, so it goes on to say that killing during the day is a real action.