English
If an establishable thing is permanent, then separation from it is contradictory. Because being united with conjunctions, etc., is contradictory to separation, it must be said that way. We must also say that we are separated from conjunctions, etc. Therefore, by separation, union, liberation, etc., when speaking of an establishable word with words of action such as conjunction and separation, this nature of meaning must be definitely stated. At that time, what is the use of examining other meaningless things such as going? There is no use at all. Among the "etc.", conjunction and separation, and not being other, etc., are included. Why? Because, even if those things such as going are examined and exist, the connection of "this" cannot be established. Because all connections are blocked by "having the freedom of others," etc., the connection of "this" action and conjunction and separation, etc., cannot be established, so where would there be a statement with that reason? If it is like other perceived actions, etc., then it is not related to others, because it is not related. Manifest desire is also the same. Because it is related to actions, etc., in that way, it is not going, etc. Therefore, the basis of continuous arising, the things that arise moment by moment due to other and other causes, should be considered as this different thing. It should be considered as union, separation, and going, etc. The nature of relying solely is not a connection of conjunctions, etc., so there is no true connection of the nature of conjunctions, etc. Therefore, the nature of all things is without connection, it is peaceful. The commentary on "Examination of Connection," written by the great teacher Dharmakirti, the lion of speech, is complete. The commentary on "Examination of Connection," Dharmakirti glorious.