Back to the library

B01030204.saccavibhaṅgo (truth analysis treatise)

English

The truth of origin is both a fetter and fettering. Two truths are not to be said: "both fetters and fettering," or "both fettering and not fetters." The truth of suffering might be both a fetter and fettering, might be both fettering and not a fetter. The truth of origin is both a fetter and associated with fetters. Two truths are not to be said: "both fetters and associated with fetters," or "both associated with fetters and not fetters." The truth of suffering might be both a fetter and associated with fetters, might be both associated with fetters and not a fetter, might not be said: "both a fetter and associated with fetters," or "both associated with fetters and not a fetter." Two truths are disassociated from fetters and not fettering. The truth of origin is not to be said: "disassociated from fetters and fettering," or "disassociated from fetters and not fettering." The truth of suffering might be disassociated from fetters and fettering, might not be said: "disassociated from fetters and fettering," or "disassociated from fetters and not fettering." The truth of origin is a tie. Two truths are not ties. The truth of suffering might be a tie, might not be a tie. Two truths are tying. Two truths are not tying. Two truths are disassociated from ties. Two truths might be associated with ties, might be disassociated from ties. The truth of origin is both a tie and tying. Two truths are not to be said: "both ties and tying," or "both tying and not ties." The truth of suffering might be both a tie and tying, might be both tying and not a tie. The truth of origin is a tie. and is both a bond and associated with a bond. It may not be said – "it is both a bond and associated with a bond," nor "it is associated with a bond but not a bond." Two truths may not be said – "they are both bonds and associated with bonds," nor "they are associated with bonds but not bonds." The truth of suffering may be both a bond and associated with a bond, it may be associated with a bond but not a bond, it may not be said – "it is both a bond and associated with a bond," nor "it is associated with a bond but not a bond." Two truths are dissociated from bonds and not bond-related. Two truths may be dissociated from bonds and bond-related, they may not be said – "they are dissociated from bonds and bond-related," nor "they are dissociated from bonds and not bond-related." The truth of origin is a flood... and so on... a yoke... and so on... a hindrance. Two truths are not hindrances. The truth of suffering may be a hindrance, it may not be a hindrance. Two truths are hindrance-related, two truths are not hindrance-related. The truth of origin is associated with hindrances. Two truths are dissociated from hindrances. The truth of suffering may be associated with hindrances, it may be dissociated from hindrances. The truth of origin is both a hindrance and hindrance-related. Two truths may not be said – "they are both hindrances and hindrance-related," nor "they are hindrance-related but not hindrances." The truth of suffering may be both a hindrance and hindrance-related, it may be hindrance-related but not a hindrance. The truth of origin is both a hindrance and associated with hindrances. Two truths may not be said – "they are both hindrances and associated with hindrances," nor "they are associated with hindrances but not hindrances." The truth of suffering may be both a hindrance and associated with hindrances, it may be associated with hindrances but not a hindrance, it may not be said – "it is both a hindrance and associated with hindrances," nor "it is associated with hindrances but not a hindrance." Two truths are dissociated from hindrances and not hindrance-related. The truth of origin may not be said – "a hindr (It might be said) "disjoined from hindrances, hindrance-related," (and it might be said) "disjoined from hindrances, non-hindrance-related." The truth of suffering might be disjoined from hindrances, hindrance-related. It might not be said: "disjoined from hindrances, hindrance-related," or "disjoined from hindrances, non-hindrance-related." Three truths are not wrong views. The truth of suffering might be a wrong view, might not be a wrong view. Two truths are clung to. Two truths are not clung to. Two truths are disjoined from wrong views. The truth of origin might be associated with wrong views, might be disjoined from wrong views. The truth of suffering might be associated with wrong views, might be disjoined from wrong views, might not be said: "associated with wrong views," or "disjoined from wrong views." The truth of origin might not be said: "both a wrong view and clung to," but it is clung to and not a wrong view. Two truths might not be said: "both wrong views and clung to," or "both clung to and not wrong views." The truth of suffering might be both a wrong view and clung to, might be clung to and not a wrong view. Two truths are disjoined from wrong views and not clung to. Two truths might be disjoined from wrong views and clung to, might not be said: "disjoined from wrong views and clung to," or "disjoined from wrong views and not clung to." Two truths have an object. The truth of cessation is without an object. The truth of suffering might have an object, might be without an object. Three truths are not consciousness. The truth of suffering might be consciousness, might not be consciousness. Two truths are mental concomitants. The truth of cessation is not a mental concomitant. The truth of suffering might be a mental concomitant, might not be a mental concomitant. Two truths are associated with consciousness. The truth of cessation is disjoined from consciousness. The truth of suffering might be associated with consciousness, might be disjoined from consciousness, might not be said: "associated with consciousness," or "disjoined from consciousness." Two truths are conjoined with consciousness. The truth of cessation is unconjoined with consciousness. The truth of suffering might be conjoined with consciousness, might be unconjoined with consciousness. Conjoined, it might not be said – "conjoined with mind" nor "disjoined from mind". Two truths are mind-originated. The truth of cessation is not mind-originated. The truth of suffering might be mind-originated, might not be mind-originated. Two truths are co-existent with mind. The truth of cessation is not co-existent with mind. The truth of suffering might be co-existent with mind, might not be co-existent with mind. Two truths follow the mind. The truth of cessation does not follow the mind. The truth of suffering might follow the mind, might not follow the mind. Two truths are mind-conjoined-originated. The truth of cessation is not mind-conjoined-originated. The truth of suffering might be mind-conjoined-originated, might not be mind-conjoined-originated. Two truths are mind-conjoined-originated-co-existent. The truth of cessation is not mind-conjoined-originated-co-existent. The truth of suffering might be mind-conjoined-originated-co-existent, might not be mind-conjoined-originated-co-existent. Two truths follow mind-conjoined-originated. The truth of cessation does not follow mind-conjoined-originated. The truth of suffering might follow mind-conjoined-originated, might not follow mind-conjoined-originated. Three truths are external. The truth of suffering might be internal, might be external. Three truths are not clinging. The truth of suffering might be clinging, might not be clinging. Three truths are not clung to. The truth of suffering might be clung to, might not be clung to. The truth of origin is clinging. Two truths are not clingings. The truth of suffering might be clinging, might not be clinging. Two truths are objects of clinging. Two truths are not objects of clinging. Two truths are disjoined from clinging. Two truths might be conjoined with clinging, might be disjoined from clinging. The truth of origin is both clinging and an object of clinging. Two truths should not be said – "both clingings and objects of clinging" nor "both objects of clinging and not clingings". The truth of suffering might be both clinging and And graspable, it may be graspable but not grasping. The Truth of Origin may be both grasping and associated with grasping, it may not be said – "both grasping and associated with grasping" or "associated with grasping but not grasping." Two truths are not to be said – "both grasping and associated with grasping" or "associated with grasping but not grasping." The Truth of Suffering may be both grasping and associated with grasping, may be associated with grasping but not grasping, it may not be said – "both grasping and associated with grasping" or "associated with grasping but not grasping." Two truths are dissociated from grasping and not graspable. Two truths may be dissociated from grasping but graspable, it may not be said – "dissociated from grasping but graspable" or "dissociated from grasping and not graspable." The Truth of Origin is defilement. Two truths are not defilements. The Truth of Suffering may be defilement, may not be defilement. Two truths are defiling. Two truths are not defiling. The Truth of Origin is defiled. Two truths are undefiled. The Truth of Suffering may be defiled, may be undefiled. The Truth of Origin is associated with defilement. Two truths are dissociated from defilement. The Truth of Suffering may be associated with defilement, may be dissociated from defilement. The Truth of Origin is both defilement and defiling. Two truths are not to be said – "both defilement and defiling" or "defiling but not defilement." The Truth of Suffering may be both defilement and defiling, may be defiling but not defilement. The Truth of Origin is both defilement and defiled. Two truths are not to be said – "both defilement and defiled" or "defiled but not defilement." The Truth of Suffering may be both defilement and defiled,