English
And the basis, and the unskilled, the person, and by gain; A rift in the Sangha breaks, and a schism, just so. The Chapter on Schismatics "By how many factors, venerable sir, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable?" "By five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares the non-Dhamma to be Dhamma, declares the Dhamma to be non-Dhamma, declares the non-Vinaya to be Vinaya, declares the Vinaya to be non-Vinaya, and having set aside the view, by action – By these five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable." "By other five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares the non-Dhamma to be Dhamma, declares the Dhamma to be non-Dhamma, declares the non-Vinaya to be Vinaya, declares the Vinaya to be non-Vinaya, and having set aside the view, by declaration – By these five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable." "By other five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares the non-Dhamma to be Dhamma, declares the Dhamma to be non-Dhamma, declares the non-Vinaya to be Vinaya, declares the Vinaya to be non-Vinaya, and having set aside the view, by utterance – By these five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable." "By other five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares the non-Dhamma to be Dhamma, declares the Dhamma to be non-Dhamma, declares the non-Vinaya to be Vinaya, declares the Vinaya to be non-Vinaya, and having set aside the view, by proclamation – By these five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who breaks the Saṅgha, destined for the woeful states, for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable." Again. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is bound for states of woe, bound for hell, abides for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares non-Dhamma as Dhamma, declares Dhamma as non-Dhamma, declares non-Vinaya as Vinaya, declares Vinaya as non-Vinaya, and, having set aside his view, takes the vote. Indeed, Upāli, endowed with these five factors, a schismatic is bound for states of woe, bound for hell, abides for an eon, incurable. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is bound for states of woe, bound for hell, abides for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares non-Dhamma as Dhamma, declares Dhamma as non-Dhamma, declares non-Vinaya as Vinaya, declares Vinaya as non-Vinaya, and, having set aside his approval, takes the vote. Indeed, Upāli, endowed with these five factors, a schismatic is bound for states of woe, bound for hell, abides for an eon, incurable. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is bound for states of woe, bound for hell, abides for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares non-Dhamma as Dhamma, declares Dhamma as non-Dhamma, declares non-Vinaya as Vinaya, declares Vinaya as non-Vinaya, and, having set aside his preference, takes the vote. Indeed, Upāli, endowed with these five factors, a schismatic is bound for states of woe, bound for hell, abides for an eon, incurable. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is bound for states of woe, bound for hell, abides for an eon, incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares non-Dhamma as Dhamma, declares Dhamma as non-Dhamma, declares non-Vinaya as Vinaya, declares Vinaya as non-Vinaya, and, having set aside... by setting aside perception by action… by setting aside perception by designation… by setting aside perception by declaration… by setting aside perception by announcement… by setting aside perception by taking the tickets – with these five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who is a schismatic, bound for the woeful state, bound for hell, to remain for an eon, incurable.” The Chapter on Schismatics, the eleventh, is finished. Its summary: By setting aside view by action, by designation, by declaration; by announcement, by tickets, these five are based on view; patience, inclination, and perception, these three are led in five ways. 12. The Second Chapter on Schismatics “By how many factors, venerable sir, is one endowed who is a schismatic, not bound for the woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable?” “By five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who is a schismatic, not bound for the woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares what is not Dhamma to be Dhamma, declares what is Dhamma to be not Dhamma, declares what is not Vinaya to be Vinaya, declares what is Vinaya to be not Vinaya, without setting aside view by action – with these five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who is a schismatic, not bound for the woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. And by other five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who is a schismatic, not bound for the woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares what is not Dhamma to be Dhamma, declares what is Dhamma to be not Dhamma, declares what is not Vinaya to be Vinaya, declares what is Vinaya to be not Vinaya, without setting aside view by designation – with these five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who is a schismatic, not bound for the woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. And by other five factors, Upāli, is one endowed who is a schismatic, not bound for the woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares what is not Dhamma to be Dhamma, declares what is Dhamma to be not Dhamma, declares what is not Vinaya to be Vinaya, declares what is Vinaya to be not Vinaya, explains, speaking without holding a view. Indeed, Upāli, endowed with these five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk explains non-Dhamma as Dhamma, explains Dhamma as non-Dhamma, explains non-Vinaya as Vinaya, explains Vinaya as non-Vinaya, by proclamation, without holding a view. Indeed, Upāli, endowed with these five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk explains non-Dhamma as Dhamma, explains Dhamma as non-Dhamma, explains non-Vinaya as Vinaya, explains Vinaya as non-Vinaya, by taking a vote, without holding a view. Indeed, Upāli, endowed with these five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk explains non-Dhamma as Dhamma, explains Dhamma as non-Dhamma, explains non-Vinaya as Vinaya, explains Vinaya as non-Vinaya, without holding patience, by action... without holding patience, by declaration... without holding patience, by speaking... without holding patience, by proclamation... without holding patience, by taking a vote. Indeed, Upāli, endowed with these five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Again, Upāli, endowed with five factors, a schismatic is not destined for a woeful state, not destined for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk a He declares Dhamma as Dhamma, he declares Dhamma as non-Dhamma, he declares non-Discipline as Discipline, he declares Discipline as non-Discipline, without having established his preference by action, without having established his preference by designation, without having established his preference by utterance, without having established his preference by proclamation, without having established his preference by taking the voting sticks – Upāli, a schismatic endowed with these five factors is not bound for a woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Upāli, a schismatic endowed with another five factors is not bound for a woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. Which five? Here, Upāli, a monk declares non-Dhamma as Dhamma, he declares Dhamma as non-Dhamma, he declares non-Discipline as Discipline, he declares Discipline as non-Discipline, without having established his perception by action, without having established his perception by designation, without having established his perception by utterance, without having established his perception by proclamation, without having established his perception by taking the voting sticks – Upāli, a schismatic endowed with these five factors is not bound for a woeful state, not bound for hell, not to remain for an eon, not incurable. The Second Chapter on Schismatics, the twelfth, is finished. Its summary –