Back to the library

t26n1539 abhidharma vijnanakaya pada sastra.g2.0f

English

English version: There are five types of minds that belong to the Desire Realm, and there are five types of minds that do not belong to the Desire Realm. What are the five types of minds that belong to the Desire Realm? They are the minds in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing suffering, severed by seeing the origin, severed by seeing cessation, severed by seeing the path, and severed by cultivation. Just like these five types of minds in the Desire Realm, so too are the five types of minds that belong to the Form Realm and the Formless Realm. Then, are all minds in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing suffering able to distinguish the dharmas (phenomena, teachings) in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing suffering? Are they able to distinguish the four types of severable dharmas in their own realm? Are they able to distinguish the five types of severable dharmas that belong to the Desire Realm, Form Realm, and Formless Realm? Just like the minds in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing suffering, so too are the minds severed by seeing the origin, severed by seeing cessation, severed by seeing the path, and severed by cultivation. Just like these five types of minds in the Desire Realm, so too are the five types of minds that belong to the Form Realm and the Formless Realm. Then, are all minds in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing suffering able to distinguish the dharmas in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing suffering? The answer is: They are able to distinguish. That is to say, either clinging to 'self' (Atman), or clinging to 'what belongs to self' (belongings of Atman), or clinging to annihilationism, or clinging to eternalism, or denying the existence of suffering, or clinging to something as venerable, or clinging to something as superior, or clinging to something as supreme, or clinging to something as the first, or clinging to something as pure, or clinging to something as liberation, or clinging to something as escape, as well as the confusion, doubt, hesitation, greed, hatred, arrogance, and ignorance arising from these, or the discriminations induced by improper attention. Are they also able to distinguish the four types of severable dharmas in their own realm? The answer is: They are able to distinguish. That is to say, either clinging to 'self', or clinging to 'what belongs to self', or clinging to annihilationism, or clinging to eternalism, or denying the existence of suffering, or clinging to something as venerable, or clinging to something as superior, or clinging to something as supreme, or clinging to something as the first, or clinging to something as pure, or clinging to something as liberation, or clinging to something as escape, as well as the confusion, doubt, hesitation, lack of wisdom, darkness, and ignorance arising from these, or the discriminations induced by improper attention. Are they also able to distinguish the five types of severable dharmas that belong to the Desire Realm, Form Realm, and Formless Realm? The answer is: They are able to distinguish. That is to say, either denying the existence of suffering, or clinging to something as venerable, or clinging to something as superior, or clinging to something as supreme, or clinging to something as the first, or clinging to something as pure, or clinging to something as liberation, or clinging to something as escape, as well as the confusion, doubt, hesitation, lack of wisdom, darkness, and ignorance arising from these, or the discriminations induced by improper attention. Then, are all minds in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing the origin able to distinguish the dharmas in the Desire Realm that are severed by seeing the origin? The answer is: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 能了别。谓或拨无因、或执为尊、或执为胜、或执为上、或执第一,若惑若疑若犹豫,若贪若瞋若慢若痴,若不如理所引了别。亦能了别自地四种、色界系无色界系五种所断法耶?曰:能了别。谓或拨无因、或执为尊、或执为胜、或执为上、或执第一,若惑若疑若犹豫、若无智若冥暗若愚痴,若不如理所引了别。诸欲界系见灭所断心,能了别欲界系见灭所断法耶?曰:能了别。谓或执为尊、或执为胜、或执为上、或执第一,若贪若瞋若慢若痴,若不如理所引了别。亦能了别不系法耶?曰:能了别。谓或拨无灭,若犹豫了别若愚痴,若不如理所引了别。如是了别,余不了别。诸欲界系见道所断心,能了别欲界系见道所断法耶?曰:能了别。谓或执为尊、或执为胜、或执为上、或执第一、或执清净、或执解脱、或执出离,若贪若瞋若慢若痴,若不如理所引了别。亦能了别不系法耶?曰:能了别。谓或拨无道,若犹豫了别若愚痴,若不如理所引了别。如是了别,余不了别。诸欲界系修所断心,能了别欲界系修所断法耶?曰?能了别。谓若贪若瞋若慢若痴、若粗若苦若障、若如病若如痈若如箭若恼害、若无常若苦若空若无我,若于因谓因谓集谓生谓缘,若有因、若有起、若有是处、若有是事,若如理所引了别、若不如理所引了 { "translations": [ "现代汉语译本", "能了别(Neng Liao Bie,能够识别)。意思是说,或者否定因果,或者执着于某个事物为尊贵,或者执着于某个事物为殊胜,或者执着于某个事物为至上,或者执着于某个事物为第一。如果存在迷惑、怀疑、犹豫,如果存在贪婪、嗔恨、傲慢、愚痴,如果存在不如理的引导所产生的识别,那么,(这些心)能够识别。也能识别自地(Zi Di,自身所处的境界)的四种、**系无**系(Xi Wu,有束缚和无束缚)的五种所断的法吗?回答:能够识别。意思是说,或者否定因果,或者执着于某个事物为尊贵,或者执着于某个事物为殊胜,或者执着于某个事物为至上,或者执着于某个事物为第一。如果存在迷惑、怀疑、犹豫,如果存在无智、冥暗、愚痴,如果存在不如理的引导所产生的识别,那么,(这些心)能够识别。", "诸欲界系(Zhu Yu Jie Xi,所有属于欲界的)见灭所断心,能够识别欲界系见灭所断的法吗?回答:能够识别。意思是说,或者执着于某个事物为尊贵,或者执着于某个事物为殊胜,或者执着于某个事物为至上,或者执着于某个事物为第一。如果存在贪婪、嗔恨、傲慢、愚痴,如果存在不如理的引导所产生的识别,那么,(这些心)能够识别。也能识别不系法(Bu Xi Fa,不属于任何束缚的法)吗?回答:能够识别。意思是说,或者否定寂灭,如果存在犹豫的识别或者愚痴,如果存在不如理的引导所产生的识别,那么,(这些心)能够识别。这样的识别是可以的,其他的识别是不可以的。诸欲界系见道所断心,能够识别欲界系见道所断的法吗?回答:能够识别。意思是说,或者执着于某个事物为尊贵,或者执着于某个事物为殊胜,或者执着于某个事物为至上,或者执着于某个事物为第一,或者执着于某个事物为清净,或者执着于某个事物为解脱,或者执着于某个事物为出离。如果存在贪婪、嗔恨、傲慢、愚痴,如果存在不如理的引导所产生的识别,那么,(这些心)能够识别。也能识别不系法吗?回答:能够识别。意思是说,或者否定道路,如果存在犹豫的识别或者愚痴,如果存在不如理的引导所产生的识别,那么,(这些心)能够识别。这样的识别是可以的,其他的识别是不可以的。诸欲界系修所断心,能够识别欲界系修所断的法吗?回答:能够识别。意思是说,如果存在贪婪、嗔恨、傲慢、愚痴,如果存在粗糙、痛苦、障碍,如果(事物)如疾病、如毒疮、如箭矢、如恼害,如果(事物)是无常、是苦、是空、是无我,如果在因上认为是因、认为是集、认为是生、认为是缘,如果存在因,如果存在生起,如果存在是处,如果存在是事,如果存在如理的引导所产生的识别,如果存在不如理的引导所产生的" ], "english_translations": [ "English version", 'Can discern. That is to say, either denying cause and effect, or clinging to something as venerable, or clinging to something as superior, or clinging to something as supreme, or clinging to something as the first. If there is confusion, doubt, hesitation, if there is greed, hatred, arrogance, ignorance, if there is discernment induced by irrational guidance, then (these minds) can discern. Can it also discern the four types of its own realm (Zi Di, one\'s own realm), and the five types of laws to be eliminated by **bound and unbound** (Xi Wu, bound and unbound)? Answer: It can discern. That is to say, either denying cause and effect, or clinging to something as venerable, or clinging to something as superior, or clinging to something as supreme, or clinging to something as the first. If there is confusion, doubt, hesitation, if there is lack of wisdom, darkness, ignorance, if there is discernment induced by irrational guidance, then (these minds) can discern.', 'Can the mind that eliminates what is seen in the desire realm (Zhu Yu Jie Xi, all that belongs to the desire realm) discern the laws that eliminate what is seen in the desire realm? Answer: It can discern. That is to say, either clinging to something as venerable, or clinging to something as superior, or clinging to something as supreme, or clinging to something as the first. If there is greed, hatred, arrogance, ignorance, if there is discernment induced by irrational guidance, then (these minds) can discern. Can it also discern the unbound law (Bu Xi Fa, law that does not belong to any bondage)? Answer: It can discern. That is to say, either denying cessation, if there is hesitant discernment or ignorance, if there is discernment induced by irrational guidance, then (these minds) can discern. Such discernment is permissible, other discernment is not permissible. Can the mind that eliminates the path of seeing in the desire realm discern the laws that eliminate the path of seeing in the desire realm? Answer: It can discern. That is to say, either clinging to something as venerable, or clinging to something as superior, or clinging to something as supreme, or clinging to something as the first, or clinging to something as pure, or clinging to something as liberation, or clinging to something as detachment. If there is greed, hatred, arrogance, ignorance, if there is discernment induced by irrational guidance, then (these minds) can discern. Can it also discern the unbound law? Answer: It can discern. That is to say, either denying the path, if there is hesitant discernment or ignorance, if there is discernment induced by irrational guidance, then (these minds) can discern. Such discernment is permissible, other discernment is not permissible. Can the mind that eliminates what is cultivated in the desire realm discern the laws that eliminate what is cultivated in the desire realm? Answer: It can discern. That is to say, if there is greed, hatred, arrogance, ignorance, if there is coarseness, suffering, obstruction, if (things) are like disease, like a sore, like an arrow, like affliction, if (things) are impermanent, are suffering, are empty, are without self, if in cause one thinks of cause, thinks of accumulation, thinks of arising, thinks of condition, if there is cause, if there is arising, if there is a place for it, if there is a matter for it, if there is discernment induced by rational guidance, if there is discernment induced by irrational guidance.'" ] } --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chinese

别、若非如理所引非不如理所引了别。亦能了别自地四种所断法耶?曰:能了别。若粗若苦若障、若如病若如痈若如箭若恼害、若无常若苦若空若无我,若于因谓因谓集谓生谓缘,若有因、若有起、若有是处、若有是事,若如理所引了别、若非如理所引非不如理所引了别。亦能了别色界系无色界系四种所断法耶?曰:能了别。谓若粗若苦若障、若如病若如痈若如箭若恼害、若无常若苦若空若无我,若于因谓因谓集谓生谓缘,若有因、若有起、若有是处、若有是事,若如理所引了别。亦能了别色界系无色界系修所断法耶?曰:能了别。谓若粗若苦若障、若静若妙若离、若如病若如痈若如箭若如恼害、若无常若苦若空若无我,若于因谓因谓集谓生谓缘,若有因、若有起、若有是处、若有是事,若如理所引了别。亦能了别不系法耶?曰:能了别。谓若于灭谓灭谓静谓妙谓离、若于道谓道谓如谓行谓出,若无常若空若无我,若有因、若有起、若有是处、若有是事,若如理所引了别。诸色界系见苦所断心,能了别色界系见苦所断法耶?曰:能了别。谓或执为我、或执我所、或执为断、或执为常、或拨无苦、或执为尊、或执为胜、或执为上、或执第一、或执清净、或执解脱、或执出离,若惑若疑若犹豫、若贪若慢若痴,若不如理所 现代汉语译本 问:如理作意所引发的了别(如理所引了别),以及非如理作意所引发的既非如理也非不如理的了别(非如理所引非不如理所引了别),也能了别自地四种所应断除的法吗? 答:能够了别。无论是粗糙的、痛苦的、障碍的,还是像疾病、像毒疮、像箭矢、像恼害,无论是无常的、痛苦的、空的、无我的,无论是对于因误以为是因、误以为是集、误以为是生、误以为是缘,无论是有因的、有生起的、有是处的、有是事的,无论是如理作意所引发的了别,还是非如理作意所引发的既非如理也非不如理的了别,都能了别。 问:如理作意所引发的了别,以及非如理作意所引发的既非如理也非不如理的了别,也能了别系缚(系)与非系缚(无系)四种所应断除的法吗? 答:能够了别。无论是粗糙的、痛苦的、障碍的,还是像疾病、像毒疮、像箭矢、像恼害,无论是无常的、痛苦的、空的、无我的,无论是对于因误以为是因、误以为是集、误以为是生、误以为是缘,无论是有因的、有生起的、有是处的、有是事的,无论是如理作意所引发的了别,都能了别。 问:如理作意所引发的了别,也能了别系缚与非系缚的修所断法吗? 答:能够了别。无论是粗糙的、痛苦的、障碍的,还是寂静的、美妙的、远离的,还是像疾病、像毒疮、像箭矢、像恼害,无论是无常的、痛苦的、空的、无我的,无论是对于因误以为是因、误以为是集、误以为是生、误以为是缘,无论是有因的、有生起的、有是处的、有是事的,无论是如理作意所引发的了别,都能了别。 问:如理作意所引发的了别,也能了别不系缚的法吗? 答:能够了别。无论是对于灭误以为是灭、误以为是静、误以为是妙、误以为是离,无论是对于道误以为是道、误以为是如、误以为是行、误以为是出,无论是无常的、空的、无我的,无论是有因的、有生起的、有是处的、有是事的,无论是如理作意所引发的了别,都能了别。 问:诸系缚的见苦所断的心,能了别系缚的见苦所断的法吗? 答:能够了别。无论是执着为我(我,Atman)、执着为我所(我所,Atmaniya),还是执着为断灭(断,uccheda)、执着为常恒(常,nitya),还是否定痛苦(苦,Dukkha)、执着为尊贵的、执着为殊胜的、执着为至上的、执着为第一的、执着为清净的、执着为解脱的、执着为出离的,无论是迷惑(惑,Moha)、怀疑(疑,Vicikiccha)、犹豫(犹豫,Vimati),还是贪婪(贪,Lobha)、傲慢(慢,Mana)、愚痴(痴,Moha),无论是不如理的作意。