Chinese
大圆满古萨里密咒之谬见错觉破除，以及开启大圆满诀窍隐藏之门的大钥匙。 大圆满古萨里密咒之谬见错觉破除，以及开启大圆满诀窍隐藏之门的大钥匙。 ༈ 在此，不具示现意义之智慧，亦不具公正之心，为偏执意之浓厚黑暗所遮蔽，依仗尼采巴之语句文字，某些自诩为智者和博学者，具有傲慢自负之人，对于一切乘之顶峰，以及成为殊胜精华之正法大圆满，以及古萨里密咒之经续论疏窍诀等，以及对于听闻、思维、修持彼等之，汉藏之智者成就者们，加以诋毁，积累舍法之业的谬见之流，我将对此进行驳斥，愿未被偏执之垢染污之圣者们
English
The great key that opens the door to dispel the delusions of wrong views and misconceptions about the Great Perfection Ancient Secret Mantra, and to hide the essential points of the Great Perfection. The great key that opens the door to dispel the delusions of wrong views and misconceptions about the Great Perfection Ancient Secret Mantra, and to hide the essential points of the Great Perfection. ༈ Here, lacking the wisdom that shows meaning, and not possessing an impartial mind, obscured by the thick darkness of biased mind, relying on the words and letters of Nyitsewa, some individuals who boast of being wise and learned, with manifest arrogance, regarding the pinnacle of all vehicles, and the sacred Dharma Great Perfection that has become the supreme essence, and the tantras, commentaries, and instructions of the Ancient Secret Mantra, and for those who listen, contemplate, and meditate on them, the scholars and accomplished ones of China and Tibet, by denigrating them, accumulating the stream of wrong views that accumulate the karma of abandoning the Dharma, I will refute this, may the holy beings who are not defiled by the stain of bias
Chinese
请您垂鉴。关于邪见的蔓延，有这样一种说法。据说邬茹地方的上部有一位被称为智者的博学的贝丹桑波说，逝世的释迦王预见到未来他的教法中会出现魔的颠倒之法，因此在律藏和经藏中广泛地阐述了检验佛法的方法。特别是，如果不检验密宗金刚乘，只是盲目地信仰，那么由于佛法颠倒的原因会堕入地狱。因此，要检验和考察佛法、上师和弟子三者，对三者都确信不疑之后，才能安住、讲说和听闻佛法。对于这种说法，我的回答是：首先，这与你自己的话相矛盾。既然你预见到自己的教法中会出现魔的颠倒之法，所以才阐述了检验佛法的方法，那么在像西藏这样的小地方，无论出现多少邪法，你都无法一一预言，这岂不是自相矛盾吗？如果无法一一预言，那么一切智者就应该根据众生的意愿，用各个地方的语言向各种各样的众生宣说各种各样的佛法，这岂不是也相矛盾吗？如果不宣说各种各样的佛法，那就与一切智者的身份相矛盾。总的来说，检验佛法的仪轨也只是针对一般情况而言，对于特殊情况，仅仅因为这样就断定不是佛法是不成立的，这一点将在下文阐述。三种检验是非常重要的。大导师莲花生说：上师不考察弟子，则与无精华的佛法结缘；弟子不考察上师，则与无精华的佛法结缘；双方不守护誓言，则如同断了线的牦牛坠入悬崖。这样的师徒将在末法时代出现。这段话是法主布顿仁波切在考察时轮金刚上师的相状时引用的。此外，关于上师的联系和考察法器等方面，《上师五十法》中说：与上师相处十年才能考察清楚，然后才传授给弟子。诸如此类，在仁钦林巴的教言等中也有详细的阐述。因此，你没有任何证据表明不需要考察上师和弟子。关于检验佛法，如果出现文笔上的缺陷、与文字和意义相悖、不相关联、重复、不完整等情况，并不能因此就断定不是佛法或不是佛语。时轮金刚的根本续和注释，以及胜乐金刚的上部注释等
English
Please take a look. Regarding the spread of wrong views, there is a saying like this. It is said that the learned Beten Sangpo, who is known as a scholar in the upper part of Uru, said that the deceased Shakya King foresaw that in the future, the reversed Dharma of demons would appear in his teachings, so he extensively explained the methods of examining the Dharma in the Vinaya and Sutra Pitakas. In particular, if one does not examine the Secret Mantra Vajrayana, but blindly believes, one will fall into hell due to the reversed Dharma. Therefore, one must examine and investigate the three: the Dharma, the Guru, and the disciple, and only after being convinced of all three can one abide, speak, and listen to the Dharma. In response to this statement, my answer is: First of all, this contradicts your own words. Since you foresaw that the reversed Dharma of demons would appear in your teachings, you explained the method of examining the Dharma. Then, in a small place like Tibet, no matter how many evil dharmas appear, you cannot predict them one by one, wouldn't that be self-contradictory? If it is impossible to predict them one by one, then the All-Knowing One should, according to the wishes of sentient beings, use the languages of various places to preach various dharmas to various sentient beings, wouldn't that also be contradictory? If various dharmas are not preached, then it contradicts the identity of the All-Knowing One. In general, the ritual of examining the Dharma is only for general situations. For special situations, it is not established that it is not the Dharma just because of this, which will be explained below. The three examinations are very important. The great teacher Padmasambhava said: If the Guru does not examine the disciple, he is connected with the Dharma without essence; if the disciple does not examine the Guru, he is connected with the Dharma without essence; if both do not keep their vows, they will fall into the abyss like a yak with a broken rope. Such teachers and disciples will appear in the degenerate age. This passage was quoted by Dharma Lord Buton Rinpoche when examining the characteristics of the Kalachakra Guru. In addition, regarding the connection of the Guru and the examination of vessels, etc., the "Fifty Verses on the Guru" says: One can examine clearly by associating with the Guru for ten years, and then teach the disciple. Such things are also explained in detail in the teachings of Rinchen Lingpa, etc. Therefore, you have no evidence to show that it is not necessary to examine the Guru and the disciple. Regarding the examination of the Dharma, if there are defects in writing, contradictions with words and meanings, irrelevance, repetition, incompleteness, etc., it cannot be concluded that it is not the Dharma or not the words of the Buddha. The root tantra and commentary of Kalachakra, and the upper commentary of Chakrasamvara, etc.
Chinese
如《心性解释》等和《那若六法大释》等中明确说到的那样。以不指文字而指意义为证，如果通过考察能够成立，那么，印度的班智达和成就者莲花生，吉祥喜金刚，妙吉祥友，师利星哈，智经，无垢友，因陀罗菩提，咕咕惹匝，国王匝，公主郭玛德维，邬巴惹匝，僧哈惹匝，扎哈梯，美貌金刚，佛密，印度圣者，班智达释迦师利等，以及藏地的毗卢遮那，卡焦克师徒二人，君臣二十五人，玛仁钦秋，阿若耶谢炯内，索，祖，努，匝等智者成就者们，从昆·鲁旺松瓦到法王索南坚赞之间的萨迦派，以及俄·雷谢等噶当派，直贡巴，蔡巴，玛尔仲等达波噶举派，以及香巴噶举派的众多上师们，仅仅通过闻思修三者，也能令人信服。对于心胸狭隘、无缘分、具有邪见的人来说，没有成为他们的对境，这真是遗憾。像这样通过三种考察和三种信任而进入是非常重要的。现在有些人因为没有共同之处，就认为不存在，这是不成立的，对您来说也是一样。对此也有这样的说法：在藏地这个地方，现在有一种叫做大圆满的无边续部。据说这是普贤王如来说的。吉祥喜金刚，妙吉祥友，师利星哈，龙树菩提，咕咕惹匝等等，乌仗那和印度的所有智者成就者的修行的主要内容就是这个。据说莲花生大师，无垢友和毗卢遮那从印度带到藏地，在以前的君臣菩提萨埵时期翻译的。对于这个说法的回答是：印度和藏地的班智达和成就者们没有修习过这些，而且在那些君臣在世的时候，咕咕惹匝没有翻译过《佛陀合修法》，仁钦多吉没有翻译过《合修幻化法》，没有任何可以证明的理由和经论量。藏地的前后伟人
English
As clearly stated in works such as the "Explanation of Mind" and the "Great Commentary on the Six Yogas of Naropa." If it can be established by examining with the testimony of pointing to the meaning rather than the words, then the great Indian pandits and accomplished masters such as Padmasambhava, Garab Dorje, Manjushrimitra, Shri Singha, Jnanasutra, Vimalamitra, Indrabodhi, Kukkuraja, King Ja, Princess Gomadevi, Uparaja, Simharaja, Prahati, Beautiful Vajra, Buddha Secret, the Holy Indian, Pandit Shakya Shri, and others, as well as the Tibetan Vairochana, Ka and Chok, the two disciples, the twenty-five king and subjects, Ma Rinchen Chok, Aro Yeshe Jungne, So, Zur, Nup, Tsa, and other wise and accomplished masters, from Khon Luwang Sungwa to Dharma Lord Sonam Gyaltsen of the Sakya school, and the Kadampa masters such as Ngok Lekshe, and the Drikung Kagyu, Tshelpa Kagyu, Martsang Kagyu, and other Dagpo Kagyu schools, and the numerous Shangpa Kagyu lamas, have all attained conviction through the three practices of hearing, contemplation, and meditation. It is regrettable that this has not become an object for those with narrow minds, lack of fortune, and wrong views. Thus, entering through the three examinations and three convictions is extremely important. Now, some people deny its existence because it is not common, but this is not valid, and it is the same for you. In this regard, it is also said: In this land of Tibet, there is now a vast collection of tantras called Dzogchen. It is said that this was spoken by Samantabhadra. Garab Dorje, Manjushrimitra, Shri Singha, Nagarjuna Bodhi, Kukkuraja, and others, this is the main practice of all the wise and accomplished masters of Oddiyana and India. It is said that Guru Padmasambhava, Vimalamitra, and Vairochana brought it from India to Tibet and translated it during the time of the former king and subjects Bodhisattvas. The response to this statement is: It is not the practice of those Indian and Tibetan pandits and accomplished masters, and there is no evidence or valid reasoning to show that Kukkuraja did not translate the Buddha Samyoga cycle and Rinchen Dorje did not translate the Samyoga Mayajala cycle during the time of those king and subjects. The great and holy beings of Tibet, past and present.
Chinese
所有已经出现的人，以及萨迦班智达和布敦等等。说“前译密咒宁玛派”，以及“宁玛派密咒是这样认为的”，如果统一口径这样说，是没有什么可否认的。如果那些人没有修习和翻译，但如果西藏愚笨之人，把那些（教法）归咎于他们而认为是自己编造的，那就太过分了，因为如上所说的萨迦派等等，也成了追随自己编造的谎言而行持邪法，这样一种指责也就顺理成章地成立了。其他还有很多，没有穷尽。还有这样说的：然而如果对此进行考察和分析，首先因为写作的技巧低劣，存在着矛盾、不相关联、不完整、重复，以及天性低劣如孩童、牧童和疯子般的语言特征。对于名称的翻译、词源的解释、密咒的收集，以及密咒的场合认为是印度和邬金的语言等等，在头脑中没有浮现出印度语言类型的面貌，而是将ཅ་ཆ་ཇ་三个字和ཞ་ཟ་འ་等字混合，并且混杂了藏语的成分，在每个辅音的范畴内，混入了不协调的元音ཨི་ཨུ་ཨེ་ཨོ་两个或三个甚至四个等等，出现了无边无际的语音错误。在工巧、医方明、因明和内明等学科的术语方面，出现了无数不懂这些知识的愚蠢言辞。将星宿罗睺的名字认为是遍入天，以及将神遍入天的名字说成是魔王སྐོས་རྗེ་བྲང་དཀར（藏文），等等，诸如天、龙、非天、生灵，以及海洋、山、日月、树木等等，名字的称谓错误，与内外任何一种论典都不相符的情况有很多。以及འགོགས་པོ（藏文）、དམུ་（藏文）、བཙན་（藏文）和ཐེའུ་རང་（藏文）、གཉན་（藏文）、གནམ་སྨན（藏文）和ས་བསེན（藏文）、བཟེད་（藏文）等等非人类种类的名称，在印度的梵语中没有对应词，并且与清净的经续不相符，是从苯教的典籍中引用的，是西藏愚人的习俗等等。对于这些话，回答是：如果认为其中没有写作技巧精妙、没有矛盾、没有不相关联、没有不完整、没有重复等等，因此就认为不是佛陀的教言，那就太过了。
English
All those who have appeared, including Sakya Pandita and Buton, etc., saying "Early Translation Secret Mantra Nyingma," and "Nyingma Mantras hold this view," if they unanimously say so, there is nothing to deny. If those people did not practice and translate them, but if foolish Tibetans attribute those (teachings) to them and think they were self-created, then it is too much, because the Sakyas mentioned above, etc., also follow their own fabricated lies and practice wrong Dharma, such an accusation would logically be established. There are many others, without end. It is also said that: However, if one examines and analyzes this, firstly, due to the poor writing skills, there are contradictions, irrelevance, incompleteness, repetition, and the characteristics of language that are as base as children, cowherds, and madmen. Regarding the translation of names, the explanation of etymology, the collection of mantras, and the occasions of mantras being considered in Indian and Ugyen languages, etc., without the appearance of the form of Indian language types in the mind, the three letters ཅ་ཆ་ཇ་ and ཞ་ཟ་འ་ etc. are mixed, and Tibetan language components are mixed, and within the scope of each consonant, incompatible vowels ཨི་ཨུ་ཨེ་ཨོ་ two or three or even four etc. are mixed in, resulting in endless phonetic errors. In the terminology of crafts, medicine, logic, and inner science, there are countless foolish words that do not understand these knowledges. Considering the name of the planet Rahu as Khyabjuk (Vishnu), and saying that the name of the god Khyabjuk is the demon སྐོས་རྗེ་བྲང་དཀར (Tibetan), etc., such as gods, nagas, asuras, spirits, and oceans, mountains, sun, moon, trees, etc., the names are wrongly pronounced, and there are many cases that do not match any internal or external treatises. And འགོགས་པོ (Tibetan), དམུ་ (Tibetan), བཙན་ (Tibetan) and ཐེའུ་རང་ (Tibetan), གཉན་ (Tibetan), གནམ་སྨན (Tibetan) and ས་བསེན (Tibetan), བཟེད་ (Tibetan) etc. the names of non-human species, there are no corresponding words in Indian Sanskrit, and they do not match the pure sutras and tantras, they are quoted from the Bon scriptures, and are customs of foolish Tibetans, etc. To these words, the answer is: If one thinks that there are no exquisite writing skills, no contradictions, no irrelevance, no incompleteness, no repetition, etc., and therefore thinks that it is not the Buddha's teachings, then it is too much.