English
and in the five-constituent realm, at the moment of the arising of consciousness in the course of existence, for them there, the life faculty also arises, and the mind faculty also arose. Or again, for whom, where, the mind faculty arose, for him there, does the life faculty arise? For those passing away from the four-constituent realm, and from the five-constituent realm, at the moment of the dissolution of consciousness in the course of existence, for them there, the mind faculty arose, but for them there, the life faculty does not arise. For those reborn in the four-constituent realm, and in the five-constituent realm, at the moment of the arising of consciousness in the course of existence, for them there, the mind faculty also arose, and the life faculty also arises. For whom, where, the joy faculty arises, for him there, does the equanimity faculty… …faith faculty… …wisdom faculty… …mind the faculty arose? Yes. Or, for whom and where the mind-faculty arose, for them and there does the faculty of joy arise? For all, at the moment of the dissolution of consciousness, at the moment of the arising of consciousness dissociated from joy, for them and there the mind-faculty arose, but for them and there the faculty of joy does not arise. For those who are reborn with joy, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of consciousness associated with joy, for them and there the mind-faculty arose and the faculty of joy arises. (Rooted in the faculty of joy) 351. (a) For whom and where the faculty of equanimity arises, for them and there did the faculty of faith arise? For those who are reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them and there the faculty of equanimity arises, but for them and there the faculty of faith did not arise. For others who are reborn with equanimity, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of consciousness associated with equanimity, for them and there the faculty of equanimity arises and the faculty of faith arose. (b) Or, for whom and where the faculty of faith arose, for them and there does the faculty of equanimity arise? For all, at the moment of the dissolution of consciousness, at the moment of the arising of consciousness dissociated from equanimity, for them and there the faculty of faith arose, but for them and there the faculty of equanimity does not arise. For those who are reborn with equanimity, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of consciousness associated with equanimity, for them and there the faculty of faith arose and the faculty of equanimity arises. For whom and where the faculty of equanimity arises, for them and there did the faculty of wisdom… and so on… the mind-faculty arise? For those who are reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them and there the faculty of equanimity arises, but for them and there the mind-faculty did not arise. For others who are reborn with equanimity, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of consciousness associated with equanimity, for them and there the faculty of equanimity arises and the mind-faculty arose. Or, for whom and where the mind-faculty arose, for them Does the faculty of equanimity arise there? For all, at the moment of the mind's dissolution, at the moment of the arising of a mind dissociated from equanimity, for them there, the faculty of mind arose, but for them there, the faculty of equanimity does not arise. For those reborn with equanimity, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind associated with equanimity, for them there, the faculty of mind also arose, and the faculty of equanimity also arises. For whom, where the faculty of faith arises, for him, there, did the faculty of wisdom arise? For those reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there, the faculty of faith arises, but for them there, the faculty of wisdom did not arise. For others, those reborn with roots, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind associated with faith, for them there, the faculty of faith also arises, and the faculty of wisdom also arose. Or for whom, where the faculty of wisdom arose, for him, there, does the faculty of faith arise? For all, at the moment of the mind's dissolution, at the moment of the arising of a mind dissociated from faith, for them there, the faculty of wisdom arose, but for them there, the faculty of faith does not arise. For those reborn with roots, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind associated with faith, for them there, the faculty of wisdom also arose, and the faculty of faith also arises. For whom, where the faculty of faith arises, for him, there, did the faculty of mind arise? For those reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there, the faculty of faith arises, but for them there, the faculty of mind did not arise. For others, those reborn with roots, in the course of existence, at the moment of the arising of a mind associated with faith, for them there, the faculty of faith also arises, and the faculty of mind also arose. Or for whom, where the faculty of mind arose, for him, there, does the faculty of faith arise? For all, at the moment of the mind's dissolution, at the moment of the arising of a mind dissociated from faith, for them th... there the mind-faculty arose, but for them there the faith-faculty does not arise. For those being reborn with roots, at the moment of arising of a mind-associated-with-faith in the course of existence, for them there the mind-faculty arose and the faith-faculty arises. (Rooted in the Faith-faculty) 353. (A) For whom, where the wisdom-faculty arises, for them, there the mind-faculty arose? For those being reborn into the Pure Abodes, for them there the wisdom-faculty arises, but for them there the mind-faculty did not arise. For others being reborn associated with knowledge, at the moment of arising of a mind-associated-with-knowledge in the course of existence, for them there the wisdom-faculty arises and the mind-faculty arose. (B) Or for whom, where the mind-faculty arose, for them, there the wisdom-faculty arises? For all, at the moment of dissolution of consciousness, at the moment of arising of a mind-disassociated-from-knowledge, for them there the mind-faculty arose, but for them there the wisdom-faculty does not arise. For those being reborn associated with knowledge, at the moment of arising of a mind-associated-with-knowledge in the course of existence, for them there the mind-faculty arose and the wisdom-faculty arises. (Rooted in the Wisdom-faculty) (C) The counter-case 354. (A) For whom the eye-faculty does not arise, for them the ear-faculty did not arise? It arose. (B) Or for whom the ear-faculty did not arise, for them the eye-faculty does not arise? No. (A) For whom the eye-faculty does not arise, for them the nose-faculty did not arise? It arose. (B) Or for whom the nose-faculty did not arise, for them the eye-faculty does not arise? No. For whom the eye-faculty does not arise, for them the female-faculty... (etc.)... the male-faculty did not arise? It arose. Or for whom the male-faculty did not arise, for them the eye-faculty does not arise? No. (A) For whom the eye-faculty does not arise... For him, did the faculty of life not arise? It did arise. (B) Or for whom the faculty of life did not arise, for him does the faculty of eye not arise? No. For whom the faculty of eye does not arise, for him did the faculty of joy... (and so on)... the faculty of equanimity not arise? It did arise. Or for whom the faculty of equanimity did not arise, for him does the faculty of eye not arise? No. For whom the faculty of eye does not arise, for him did the faculty of faith... (and so on)... the faculty of wisdom... (and so on)... the faculty of mind not arise? It did arise. Or for whom the faculty of mind did not arise, for him does the faculty of eye not arise? No... (and so on). 355. (A) For whom the faculty of wisdom does not arise, for him did the faculty of mind not arise? It did arise. (B) Or for whom the faculty of mind did not arise, for him does the faculty of wisdom not arise? No. (C) The contrary context. 356. Where the faculty of eye does not arise, there did the faculty of ear not arise? ... (and so on). (D) The contrary person-contexts. 357. (A) For whom, where the faculty of eye does not arise, for him, there did the faculty of ear not arise? For those passing away from the five-constituent existence, for those without eyes, for those being reborn in the sense-sphere, for them, there the faculty of eye does not arise, but for them, there the faculty of ear did arise. For those attaining final Nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for formless beings, for them, there the faculty of eye does not arise and the faculty of ear did not arise. (B) Or for whom, where the faculty of ear did not arise, for him, there does the faculty of eye not arise? For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them, there the faculty of ear did not arise, but for them, there the faculty of eye does arise. For those attaining final Nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for formless beings, for them, there the faculty of ear did not arise and the faculty of eye does not arise. (A) For whom, where the faculty of eye... If for whom, where the eye faculty does not arise, for them there the nose faculty did not arise? For those passing away from the sense-sphere, who are eyeless, and for those being reborn in the sense-sphere, for them there the eye faculty does not arise, but for them there the nose faculty did arise. For those passing away from the form-sphere, and non-percipient beings, and formless beings, for them there the eye faculty does not arise, and the nose faculty did not arise. (Kha) Or again, if for whom, where the nose faculty did not arise, for them there the eye faculty does not arise? For those being reborn in the form-sphere,