Chinese
大正藏第 31 册 No. 1623 观总相论颂 No. 1623 观总相论颂一卷 陈那菩萨造 三藏法师义净奉 制译 诸有乐略者 彼已显方隅 若有爱烦文 为彼说总相 由声及义智 俗言为本者 是观总相言 此颂声及义 谓声并义二 此中二种智 名声兼义智 彼为根本者 谓即于因义 由诸世间说 以声义智本 是故勒为颂 声义及智义 故略造斯论 问名义连属 是俗说为本 何以故今云 但唯办声义 答曰不如此 纵有连属声 唯名与义二 诸有许共相 所诠及能诠 此中理印持 咸摄入于此 谓不相离性 方许相连属 故今不别说 由能诠名等 唯局连属门 了彼所诠义 故以总相性 方得解了者 后当以广说 故唯声义智 连属道理成 有余复意乐 此中名义二 有三种差别 谓声并义二 观总相论颂一卷 现代汉语译本 《观总相论颂》一卷 陈那菩萨造 三藏法师义净奉 制译 对于那些喜欢简略的人，（总相）已经显明了纲要。 如果有人喜欢繁琐的文字，就为他们解说总相。 凭借声音以及对意义的理解，以世俗的言语为根本。 这就是观察总相的言论，此颂包含声音和意义。 所谓声音和意义二者，这里有两种智慧。 名为声音兼意义的智慧，以它们为根本。 所谓以因的意义，通过世间众生的说法。 以声音、意义和智慧为根本，所以概括为颂。 声音、意义以及智慧的意义，因此简略地造了这部论。 问：名和义的连属，是以世俗的说法为根本。 为什么现在说，仅仅是辨别声音和意义？ 答：不是这样的，即使有连属的声音。 也只有名和义二者，那些认为有共同相的人。 所诠释的和能诠释的，这里有理智的印证。 都包含在这里面，所谓不相离的性质。 才允许相互连属，所以现在不另外说明。 由于能诠释的名等等，只局限于连属的方面。 了解那所诠释的意义，所以以总相的性质。 才能得以理解，后面将会详细解说。 所以只有声音、意义和智慧，连属的道理才能成立。 还有其他的意乐，这里名和义二者。 有三种差别，即声音和意义二者。 《观总相论颂》一卷
English
English version 'Verses on the Treatise on Examining General Characteristics', one fascicle Composed by Bodhisattva Dignāga (Chenna pusa) Translated by the Tripiṭaka Master Yijing (San Zang Fa Shi Yi Jing) under Imperial Order For those who delight in brevity, the outline has already been made clear. If there are those who love elaborate texts, for them, the general characteristics are explained. Relying on sound and the understanding of meaning, with conventional language as the foundation. This is the discourse on examining general characteristics; this verse encompasses sound and meaning. So-called sound and meaning, these two; here, there are two kinds of wisdom. Named the wisdom of sound and meaning combined; taking them as the foundation. So-called the meaning of cause, through the speech of sentient beings. With sound, meaning, and wisdom as the foundation, therefore, summarized into verses. Sound, meaning, and the meaning of wisdom; therefore, this treatise is briefly composed. Question: The connection between name and meaning is based on conventional speech. Why is it now said that it is merely distinguishing sound and meaning? Answer: It is not so; even if there are connected sounds. There are only name and meaning, those who admit to having a common characteristic. What is explained and what can explain, here there is rational proof. All are included herein, the so-called nature of non-separation. Only then is mutual connection allowed, so it is not separately explained now. Because the name that can explain, etc., is only limited to the aspect of connection. Understanding the meaning that is explained, therefore, with the nature of general characteristics. Only then can it be understood; it will be explained in detail later. Therefore, only sound, meaning, and wisdom, the principle of connection can be established. There are other intentions as well; here, name and meaning, these two. Have three kinds of differences, namely sound and meaning, these two. 'Verses on the Treatise on Examining General Characteristics', one fascicle --------------------------------------------------------------------------------