English
Those who refute are also the same. There are no seemingly valid reasons. Because there is neither conformity nor non-conformity with the Dharma. Non-deception is because there is no deception. If you say there are reasons accompanied by deception, that is not correct, because those are different. Because it is momentary. All your reasons are stating contradictions, and are accompanied by deception. That is not correct, because there is no contradiction since they arise earlier and later. If the past becomes the past, then the past becomes the past. Moreover, it would follow that all forms of expression would cease to exist. Past reasons or time do not exist, because it is impossible. If you say that everything you say is stated literally, and not ultimately, that is not correct, because it would lead to faults in all answers. Because there is birth and non-birth, and neither exists, there is no refutation. That is not correct, because earlier and later, do not exist in the same and different. The position of refutation is also the same. In the position of refutation, the absence of refutation is like being bound. Because neither is admitted. If that is not established, it is simply not established. That is not a truthful statement, because there is no manifest statement. The Sutra called "Fine Grinding." Completed by the venerable teacher Nagarjuna. Translated by Kashmiri Pandit Ananta and the translator Bhikshu Drakjor Sherab. The Sutra called "Fine Grinding." Holy Nagarjuna.