English
The word "eva" should be brought and connected, otherwise it would be said that the condition comes from a single nature in those questions. By that: by the ungrasped emphasis "only one". In those: in the co-existent and pre-existent conditions. In the excellent way: in the excellent way said by "one, two" and so on. Having included those conditions: having included those conditions such as cause and so on, by co-existent and so on conditions. The demonstrated classification of conditions: the classification of conditions demonstrated by including them in sixteen divisions and so on. In the loss of divisions: the meaning is, in the divisions of conditions included by co-existent conditions and so on, in the rejection of those conditions, and in the loss of the question. "Not a cause condition": it was said, "in 'not a cause condition,' it is said with reference to the conditions that are obtained here," assuming that conditions other than the cause condition are taken by this. And having done so: it should not be said so, because it is said in terms of a common characteristic of all negations, for it cannot be said that when a cause condition stands as a negation, a cause phenomenon is a condition for a cause phenomenon by a co-existent condition. Twenty conditions: twenty conditions including the cause condition. The connection is: showing the detailed explanation of the loss. 528. By those conditions: by those conditions such as co-existent conditions and so on, which are the inclosing ones. Those conditions: those conditions to be included, such as mutual conditions and so on, or cause conditions and so on. It is said with reference to the absence of others, not all of them. are born together, is the intention. Therefore, it is said, "for not," and so on. There, "only two" is said, excluding the object-dominant condition. "Even of the unconditioned" - by the word "even," it is not only of the wholesome, but also of the unconditioned, thus encompassing the wholesome. 530. "Therefore, with faith" means with the object. "Pure" means the wholesome aggregates taken alone, without the object. Although there is no co-arising with the object, there is certainly a basis, and so on, as shown by "but with the object," and so on. Since co-arising, pre-arising, post-arising, nutriment, and faculty are to be included by the existence condition, it is said that the inclusion of those to be included by co-arising, and so on, is easy, and that the inclusion of those to be included by decisive support is as stated, "having included all conditions in the four." But kamma is also taken in its own form because there is a state of not being included by co-arising and decisive support; otherwise, it should have been said, "in the three conditions." "Of mixed and unmixed" means of that which is mixed by co-arising, pre-arising, and so on, and of that which is unmixed. To show the meaning already stated in detail, "for not," and so on, is said. "Therefore" means by the taking of co-arising, and so on, which are the divisions and collectors of the existence condition. "Of all conditions...pe...it is" - by this, it shows that the collection of conditions, though stated by "in this condition extraction," and so on, is indeed shown here in meaning. Why is the support condition not mentioned? The intention is that it is possible to divide it as co-arising support and pre-arising support. Or why is the dissociated condition not mentioned? The meaning is that it is possible to divide it as pre-arising dissociated and post-arising dissociated. To show the state of mixed and unmixed, having considered which it was said, "because it is not to be stated," it is said, "the support condition, first of all," and so on. It should be distinguished because it is stated in the Pāli without distinction as "condition by dissociated condition." "That, like" means like the existence condition, or like the support condition, the dissociated condition is not to be stated because there is no specific distinction of the existence condition. Of the two conditions showing that it has the nature of a distinction, he says, "and of the conascent and pre-nascent," and so on. To confirm the meaning stated by "thus" and so on, "he will speak" and so on is said. There, the conascent condition of existence is spoken of for the path and fruition states, in the sense of their arising from the path and fruition, and the post-nascent condition of existence is spoken of for those same states, in the sense of their pre-nascent fourfold continuity. But it is not that the state of being a dissociated condition will be spoken of—this is the connection. "So" refers to the dissociated condition. Since the causes and so on are included in the conascent, the causes and so on are their specific distinctions—having made this point, it is said, "and the conascent condition is to be distinguished from the causes and so on." "So" refers to the conascent condition. "By opposing conditions" means by conditions that are opposed to the conascent and pre-nascent in terms of their conascent nature and so on. Therefore, he says, "by conditions opposed in their time of arising." The description of the opposing examples is finished. Description of the enumeration of opposing factors Description of the non-causal root 532. The object condition, which is the basis of the dominant condition and so on, refers to the object, the dominant object, and the decisive support object. And since these are only of the nature of an object, it is said, "it is indeed diminished." "In the fifteen" refers to the fifteen mentioned by "the cause condition" and so on, in the second conascent condition. "By means of eleven" means by means of these eleven: the conascent condition, and the dominant, support, kamma, nutriment, faculty, existence, non-disappearance, cause, jhāna, and path conditions, which are specific to the conascent nature. The causes and so on are included in the conascent. "When that is rejected" means when that conascent is rejected and stands as an opposing factor. "Which are not included in the conascent?" he asks, and says, "the object-dominant, pre-nascent support, and so on." "In the manner of the object and so on" means in the manner of the object, pre-nascent support, kamma of different moments, and so on. "When that is rejected" means when that conascent condition is rejected. "These turns" are the turns that have been explained as conascent and pre-nascent. "These supports and so on" refer to the supports and so on that are specific to the conascent nature, not the others. Therefore, he says, "and since... (etc.)... they are rejected by rejection." And that which is the basis of support and so on By "excluding the sahajāta condition," it shows that here, by "excluding the sahajāta condition," the sahajāta condition is understood as being included within the dependent condition and so on. By "dependent and so on," the word "and so on" should be understood as including the root condition and so on. Because there is occurrence by way of the mutual condition, because there is occurrence by way of the sahajāta and so on by way of the mutual condition, when the mutual condition is rejected, the section "the wholesome to the wholesome-undeclared" is incomplete. "Of those conditions and their results" —this general statement, to prevent the doubt that it might only refer to those included in the mutual condition, because of the saying "those that have attained the mutual condition," "the wholesome and of the wholesome" and so on was stated. "Being a collection" means being a collection of the four aggregates. "By those that are a part" means by those that are a part of that very thing. "But the wholesome" and so on is a statement of resolution for the commentary's statement "is not by the mutual condition... ...is incomplete." Only a part of the form aggregate exists by way of form-nutriment and form-faculties. He says that the qualities stated as "exclusively by disconnected condition-qualities" are referred to by "they," saying "they are those disconnected condition-qualities." 533. Even when it is said, "to show the enumeration of the negative," someone might doubt, "is it not just the enumeration of the conditions that is shown?" To remove that doubt, he says, "for the enumeration of the negative sections has been shown." Strong kamma is a proximate cause for its result; the other is merely a kamma condition. So he says, "but even of the result... ...is a kamma condition." The explanation of the non-root basis is finished. 534. "Determined enumerations" —this does not refer to enumeration, but rather to the answers. So he says, "determined enumerations are answers." Even though the root is placed in the negative, it is placed as the basis of the methods. So he says, "in the root basis." In the commentary, however, it is stated as "in the non-root basis." 538. "Having condensed the root" means having condensed the seven-root, eight-root, and nine-root. "In two" means in the three that are stated as "three." in the first two of the pairs, namely, “wholesome phenomena for unconditioned phenomena, unwholesome phenomena for unconditioned phenomena.” Therefore, it is said, “the result is arisen by condition.” In the third, it refers to “unconditioned phenomena for unconditioned phenomena.” The body arisen from these means the body arisen from these in terms of season, mind, and nutriment. 545.This refers to the two mentioned, just as formless is not a dissociated condition for formless, so too form is not a dissociated condition for form. “Unconditioned form for unconditioned formless” is said with reference to the physical aggregate. But “unconditioned formless for unconditioned form” refers to mind-originated form, and it is said that their dissociated conditionality is absolute, thus it says, “co-arisen…etc.…it is indeed.